This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No, I won't embrace it. We all need relatable characters in fiction. Hearing Black people going mad over Black Panther demonstrates clearly that people aren't colour blind. This is not a 'White thing'.
|
|
|
Originally posted by europalace
What a stupid post.
|
|
|
Just decide between Jason Stratham or Gerard Butler. ‘The name is Bond, James f***ing Bond”
Most certainly not European. |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What a stupid post. No, a very pertinent post.
|
|
|
Originally posted by europalace
No, a very pertinent post. Actually, a very provocative and antagonistic post which is clearly a personal attack on me and nothing to do with the next James Bond.
|
|
|
Quite eye opening how many people can’t quite grasp the concept of what a fictional character is.
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Quite eye opening how many people can’t quite grasp the concept of what a fictional character is. People worship fictional characters. James Bond is based largely on Fleming himself so he is as real in that sense as other semi mythical creations. Thing is that established literary characters stop being themselves if you change them too much. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (12 Aug 2018 8.22pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by johnno42000
I really want to say that he should be able to play Bond as if he is the best for the role he should get the part. The thing that is holding me back is the fuss that is made when a white person is cast to play a black or asian role. I think I believe in fairness and it just doesn't seem fair. The other day I read about a black actress playing Emmeline Pankhurst. Seems very much a case of double standards to me. Edited by johnno42000 (12 Aug 2018 9.53pm) I think we enter into a sense of the ridiculous when real people in history are played by people of different ethnicity. What is the point unless you simply don't have actors of the correct ethnicity? With fictional characters, they never existed, so it comes down to the credibility, authenticity and sometimes the expectation of an established character as written and intended. It is double standards when we have such an over the top reaction to White people playing non White characters when the reverse is somehow seen as progress.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No, I won't embrace it. We all need relatable characters in fiction. Hearing Black people going mad over Black Panther demonstrates clearly that people aren't colour blind. This is not a 'White thing'. I know that was and is hilarious. All those 'progressives' literally applauding a movie that ticked nearly all the alt right's actual beliefs.....and for most of them it went completely over their heads.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I think we enter into a sense of the ridiculous when real people in history are played by people of different ethnicity. What is the point unless you simply don't have actors of the correct ethnicity? With fictional characters, they never existed, so it comes down to the credibility, authenticity and sometimes the expectation of an established character as written and intended. It is double standards when we have such an over the top reaction to White people playing non White characters when the reverse is somehow seen as progress. Sorry but that is simply not the case. China, Japan, India, Argentina, Mexico all had a well established film history back in "The Old Days". There were and are plenty of actors around, from all backrounds. How does any actor get there first job? They audition. Any director could audition anyone, so there was no need to get a white british actor doing a poor impression of an indian to play any such role. Having said that, films are of their time The way films are cast now is not the same as it was them, even though some things are still the same. The people who make the films always want to make films about themselves and their own experiance. Hollywood makes the films that reflect the makers. Chinese film tells stories about chinese themes. African film is about their experiance. When film makers start to portray people other than themselves, it shows those people what the film makers think of them and most of the time, it's not a lot because it's not their experiance or they have an agenda for the movie. I think what people don't like, from any backround, is when people try to tell other peoples stories, claiming that it's authentic or creating a sterotype for a particular group that has little basis in reality In regards to history, Black people, Indians, Chinese, they all have a history. The film industry has always made films set in lots of locations all over the world. It really depends on what stories you want to tell. I agree about Idris though. I just don't see how you re-create the Bond history without tearing it up and taking it in another direction. In which case, it wouldn't be bond. Finally... History has happened and attempts to rewrite it are unwise, I would suggest, even for drama. Hollywood has been re-writing peoples history since it's inception. Some even view it as a learning tool.
"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead" Stan Laurel |
|
|
Originally posted by Mr Palaceman
Sorry but that is simply not the case. China, Japan, India, Argentina, Mexico all had a well established film history back in "The Old Days". There were and are plenty of actors around, from all backrounds. How does any actor get there first job? They audition. Any director could audition anyone, so there was no need to get a white british actor doing a poor impression of an indian to play any such role. Having said that, films are of their time The way films are cast now is not the same as it was them, even though some things are still the same. The people who make the films always want to make films about themselves and their own experiance. Hollywood makes the films that reflect the makers. Chinese film tells stories about chinese themes. African film is about their experiance. When film makers start to portray people other than themselves, it shows those people what the film makers think of them and most of the time, it's not a lot because it's not their experiance or they have an agenda for the movie. I think what people don't like, from any backround, is when people try to tell other peoples stories, claiming that it's authentic or creating a sterotype for a particular group that has little basis in reality In regards to history, Black people, Indians, Chinese, they all have a history. The film industry has always made films set in lots of locations all over the world. It really depends on what stories you want to tell. I agree about Idris though. I just don't see how you re-create the Bond history without tearing it up and taking it in another direction. In which case, it wouldn't be bond. Finally... History has happened and attempts to rewrite it are unwise, I would suggest, even for drama. Hollywood has been re-writing peoples history since it's inception. Some even view it as a learning tool. I agree with you last statement and I have never liked Hollywood altering history. Selling movies is more important to them than authenticity, however,I think you are missing the key factor with regard to casting actors.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Apparently Idris Elba is being considered for the next James Bond when Craig leaves. I have a couple of observations on this. Firstly currently Hollywood seems obsessed with no 'cultural appropriation' and only having people with the right ethnicity playing, what they deem the appropriate roles......Well, seeing as James Bond was written as a white bloke with Sottish and Swiss parents that files in the face of this. However, I regard the people who push that politics as t***s and I think this should be about meritocracy and purely about the acting ability and charisma. So on that score this guy is definitely someone who can do Bond. However, as we speak Idris Elba is 45 years old. This is already too old to be starting an actor on this road. Especially if Craig is doing the next movie. So personally, I think they should start him now for one or two movies at most......Craig is already too old himself and shouldn't be doing anymore. This whole thing though might just be a cheap publicity play by the producers to keep the Bond name out there.
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I think that no actor can currently fill the boots of Craig such has been his success. They won't be willing do that. It's one of the most successful movie franchises in the world.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
|
Originally posted by Lyons550
They seem obsessed with continuing with Craig...they are going into Roger Moore 'too old' terrority.....I'd have ditched him once he had that hissy fit over the last movie anyway.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Disney is getting grief now for casting Jack Whitehall as a gay character.
Optimistic as ever |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I think we enter into a sense of the ridiculous when real people in history are played by people of different ethnicity. What is the point unless you simply don't have actors of the correct ethnicity? With fictional characters, they never existed, so it comes down to the credibility, authenticity and sometimes the expectation of an established character as written and intended. It is double standards when we have such an over the top reaction to White people playing non White characters when the reverse is somehow seen as progress. You heard of the musical Hamilton?
Optimistic as ever |
|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
Disney is getting grief now for casting Jack Whitehall as a gay character. Jack Whitehall is straight????? Frigging hell.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.