You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > Idris Elba possible next James Bond
November 8 2026 5.34pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Idris Elba possible next James Bond


Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
europalace Flag Europe 12 Aug 18 6.42pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger


Funny isn't it how outraged people become when a Black or Asian character is played by a White person but it's fine to change the ethnicity of one of he most iconic White characters in cinema just to be 'progressive'.

No, I won't embrace it. We all need relatable characters in fiction. Hearing Black people going mad over Black Panther demonstrates clearly that people aren't colour blind. This is not a 'White thing'.


You must find it very painful to support Palace with the large number of black players in the sqaud. The number has been increasing over the last 20-30 years. Must make you shudder everytime they come put on the pitch.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Aug 18 6.44pm

Originally posted by europalace


You must find it very painful to support Palace with the large number of black players in the sqaud. The number has been increasing over the last 20-30 years. Must make you shudder everytime they come put on the pitch.

What a stupid post.

 

moylerg Flag Cofton Hackett, Worcestershire 12 Aug 18 6.54pm

Just decide between Jason Stratham or Gerard Butler. ‘The name is Bond, James f***ing Bond”

 


Most certainly not European.

europalace Flag Europe 12 Aug 18 7.23pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

What a stupid post.

No, a very pertinent post.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Aug 18 7.38pm

Originally posted by europalace

No, a very pertinent post.

Actually, a very provocative and antagonistic post which is clearly a personal attack on me and nothing to do with the next James Bond.

 

DanH Flag SW2 12 Aug 18 8.13pm

Quite eye opening how many people can’t quite grasp the concept of what a fictional character is.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Aug 18 8.22pm

Originally posted by DanH

Quite eye opening how many people can’t quite grasp the concept of what a fictional character is.

People worship fictional characters.

James Bond is based largely on Fleming himself so he is as real in that sense as other semi mythical creations.

Thing is that established literary characters stop being themselves if you change them too much.
Imagine if Sherlock Holmes became a Woman or Ebeneeza Scrooge became Asian. It would make no sense.
The same applies to James Bond. I don't see how this is a difficult concept to grasp really.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (12 Aug 2018 8.22pm)

 

johnno42000 Flag 12 Aug 18 9.52pm

I really want to say that he should be able to play Bond as if he is the best for the role he should get the part. The thing that is holding me back is the fuss that is made when a white person is cast to play a black or asian role.

I think I believe in fairness and it just doesn't seem fair. The other day I read about a black actress playing Emmeline Pankhurst. Seems very much a case of double standards to me.

Edited by johnno42000 (12 Aug 2018 9.53pm)

 


'Lies to the masses as are like fly's to mollasses...they want more and more and more'

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Aug 18 10.36pm

Originally posted by johnno42000

I really want to say that he should be able to play Bond as if he is the best for the role he should get the part. The thing that is holding me back is the fuss that is made when a white person is cast to play a black or asian role.

I think I believe in fairness and it just doesn't seem fair. The other day I read about a black actress playing Emmeline Pankhurst. Seems very much a case of double standards to me.

Edited by johnno42000 (12 Aug 2018 9.53pm)

I think we enter into a sense of the ridiculous when real people in history are played by people of different ethnicity. What is the point unless you simply don't have actors of the correct ethnicity?
In the old days, 'foreign' characters were played by British actors because there just weren't any foreign actor available. Nowadays that is no longer a problem.
Obviously, large parts of European history have not featured too many Black people for obvious reasons. It is a problem when casting Black characters in historical drama since you often have to invent Black characters. History has happened and attempts to rewrite it are unwise, I would suggest, even for drama.

With fictional characters, they never existed, so it comes down to the credibility, authenticity and sometimes the expectation of an established character as written and intended.

It is double standards when we have such an over the top reaction to White people playing non White characters when the reverse is somehow seen as progress.

 

Stirlingsays Flag 13 Aug 18 12.58am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger


Funny isn't it how outraged people become when a Black or Asian character is played by a White person but it's fine to change the ethnicity of one of he most iconic White characters in cinema just to be 'progressive'.

No, I won't embrace it. We all need relatable characters in fiction. Hearing Black people going mad over Black Panther demonstrates clearly that people aren't colour blind. This is not a 'White thing'.

I know that was and is hilarious.

All those 'progressives' literally applauding a movie that ticked nearly all the alt right's actual beliefs.....and for most of them it went completely over their heads.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Mr Palaceman Flag 13 Aug 18 1.07am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I think we enter into a sense of the ridiculous when real people in history are played by people of different ethnicity. What is the point unless you simply don't have actors of the correct ethnicity?
In the old days, 'foreign' characters were played by British actors because there just weren't any foreign actor available. Nowadays that is no longer a problem.
Obviously, large parts of European history have not featured too many Black people for obvious reasons. It is a problem when casting Black characters in historical drama since you often have to invent Black characters.
History has happened and attempts to rewrite it are unwise, I would suggest, even for drama.

With fictional characters, they never existed, so it comes down to the credibility, authenticity and sometimes the expectation of an established character as written and intended.

It is double standards when we have such an over the top reaction to White people playing non White characters when the reverse is somehow seen as progress.

Sorry but that is simply not the case. China, Japan, India, Argentina, Mexico all had a well established film history back in "The Old Days". There were and are plenty of actors around, from all backrounds.

How does any actor get there first job? They audition. Any director could audition anyone, so there was no need to get a white british actor doing a poor impression of an indian to play any such role.

Having said that, films are of their time The way films are cast now is not the same as it was them, even though some things are still the same.

The people who make the films always want to make films about themselves and their own experiance. Hollywood makes the films that reflect the makers. Chinese film tells stories about chinese themes. African film is about their experiance. When film makers start to portray people other than themselves, it shows those people what the film makers think of them and most of the time, it's not a lot because it's not their experiance or they have an agenda for the movie.

I think what people don't like, from any backround, is when people try to tell other peoples stories, claiming that it's authentic or creating a sterotype for a particular group that has little basis in reality

In regards to history, Black people, Indians, Chinese, they all have a history. The film industry has always made films set in lots of locations all over the world. It really depends on what stories you want to tell.

I agree about Idris though. I just don't see how you re-create the Bond history without tearing it up and taking it in another direction. In which case, it wouldn't be bond.

Finally...

History has happened and attempts to rewrite it are unwise, I would suggest, even for drama.

Hollywood has been re-writing peoples history since it's inception. Some even view it as a learning tool.

 


"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead"

Stan Laurel

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Aug 18 10.37am

Originally posted by Mr Palaceman

Sorry but that is simply not the case. China, Japan, India, Argentina, Mexico all had a well established film history back in "The Old Days". There were and are plenty of actors around, from all backrounds.

How does any actor get there first job? They audition. Any director could audition anyone, so there was no need to get a white british actor doing a poor impression of an indian to play any such role.

Having said that, films are of their time The way films are cast now is not the same as it was them, even though some things are still the same.

The people who make the films always want to make films about themselves and their own experiance. Hollywood makes the films that reflect the makers. Chinese film tells stories about chinese themes. African film is about their experiance. When film makers start to portray people other than themselves, it shows those people what the film makers think of them and most of the time, it's not a lot because it's not their experiance or they have an agenda for the movie.

I think what people don't like, from any backround, is when people try to tell other peoples stories, claiming that it's authentic or creating a sterotype for a particular group that has little basis in reality

In regards to history, Black people, Indians, Chinese, they all have a history. The film industry has always made films set in lots of locations all over the world. It really depends on what stories you want to tell.

I agree about Idris though. I just don't see how you re-create the Bond history without tearing it up and taking it in another direction. In which case, it wouldn't be bond.

Finally...

History has happened and attempts to rewrite it are unwise, I would suggest, even for drama.

Hollywood has been re-writing peoples history since it's inception. Some even view it as a learning tool.

I agree with you last statement and I have never liked Hollywood altering history. Selling movies is more important to them than authenticity, however,I think you are missing the key factor with regard to casting actors.
Until recently, most overseas actors were, well, overseas. It would have been impractical and too costly to bring them in for most productions. I expect you would also have had issues with actors unions. For main characters, it is obvious that a profit making movie would most likely also have to feature 'known' faces.

 

Lyons550 Flag Shirley 13 Aug 18 10.46am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Apparently Idris Elba is being considered for the next James Bond when Craig leaves.

I have a couple of observations on this.

Firstly currently Hollywood seems obsessed with no 'cultural appropriation' and only having people with the right ethnicity playing, what they deem the appropriate roles......Well, seeing as James Bond was written as a white bloke with Sottish and Swiss parents that files in the face of this.

However, I regard the people who push that politics as t***s and I think this should be about meritocracy and purely about the acting ability and charisma. So on that score this guy is definitely someone who can do Bond.

However, as we speak Idris Elba is 45 years old. This is already too old to be starting an actor on this road. Especially if Craig is doing the next movie.

So personally, I think they should start him now for one or two movies at most......Craig is already too old himself and shouldn't be doing anymore.

This whole thing though might just be a cheap publicity play by the producers to keep the Bond name out there.


Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Aug 2018 1.41pm)


Though I think Craig s the best Bond there's been, i would love to see Idris take on the mantel...he has all the attributes; however it's about 8years too late for him to be able to make a meaningful impact on teh franchise. I'd far sooner Elba than the likes of Tom Hiddlestone

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 13 Aug 18 11.03am

I think that no actor can currently fill the boots of Craig such has been his success.
The best thing would be to rest the character for a decade and reboot him for a new generation. Otherwise,we might have another Dalton/Brosnan type decline in interest.

 

Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 13 Aug 18 2.55pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I think that no actor can currently fill the boots of Craig such has been his success.
The best thing would be to rest the character for a decade and reboot him for a new generation. Otherwise,we might have another Dalton/Brosnan type decline in interest.

They won't be willing do that. It's one of the most successful movie franchises in the world.
They will find someone to fill his boots.

 


Pro USA & Israel

Stirlingsays Flag 13 Aug 18 3.13pm

Originally posted by Lyons550


Though I think Craig s the best Bond there's been, i would love to see Idris take on the mantel...he has all the attributes; however it's about 8years too late for him to be able to make a meaningful impact on teh franchise. I'd far sooner Elba than the likes of Tom Hiddlestone

They seem obsessed with continuing with Craig...they are going into Roger Moore 'too old' terrority.....I'd have ditched him once he had that hissy fit over the last movie anyway.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

topcat Flag Holmesdale / Surbiton 13 Aug 18 3.57pm

Bond would have been white when the books were written as I doubt MI6 had any black agents back then but if you are setting the films in the 21st century I don't see a problem with him being black if the most appropriate actor is black.

It would be odd to have a black Robin Hood or Sherlock Holmes if they are set in the 15th/19th century but if you are producing a 21st century version of either of these then the skin colour becomes irrelevant. We are talking about fiction after all.

 


It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

Stuk Flag Top half 13 Aug 18 3.57pm

Disney is getting grief now for casting Jack Whitehall as a gay character.

[Link]

 


Optimistic as ever

Stuk Flag Top half 13 Aug 18 4.00pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I think we enter into a sense of the ridiculous when real people in history are played by people of different ethnicity. What is the point unless you simply don't have actors of the correct ethnicity?
In the old days, 'foreign' characters were played by British actors because there just weren't any foreign actor available. Nowadays that is no longer a problem.
Obviously, large parts of European history have not featured too many Black people for obvious reasons. It is a problem when casting Black characters in historical drama since you often have to invent Black characters. History has happened and attempts to rewrite it are unwise, I would suggest, even for drama.

With fictional characters, they never existed, so it comes down to the credibility, authenticity and sometimes the expectation of an established character as written and intended.

It is double standards when we have such an over the top reaction to White people playing non White characters when the reverse is somehow seen as progress.

You heard of the musical Hamilton?

 


Optimistic as ever

Stirlingsays Flag 13 Aug 18 4.18pm

Originally posted by Stuk

Disney is getting grief now for casting Jack Whitehall as a gay character.

[Link]

Jack Whitehall is straight?????

Frigging hell.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > General Talk > Idris Elba possible next James Bond