This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by kenbarr
I would warn that any national sample poll concerning the presidency does not reflect how a president is elected. It is not one national vote but 51 separate elections. I would be very interested in the state by state breakouts. What most polls show is that while the national numbers run against him, Trump is still holding on to a solid 30+% base nationally and holds leads in enough states to get him re-elected in 2020. As for nickgusset's question, the politics isn't like what is depicted but the coverage is. Remember, sex sells.
Trump won the election by winning the swing states of Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania - each by a few thousand votes out of millions cast. The total count for votes cast in these states for both Trump and Clinton is 13,233,376, with Trump getting a total of 77,744 votes more than Clinton. In none of these states was the margin of Trump's win greater than 1%. Voters in these states bought in to his economic populism - including promises to raise taxes on the wealthy and never cut social security benefits. Pennsylvania is also home to the coal industry, which Trump famously championed. Well the one major bill that he might yet get to sign this year reneges on all those promises. A poll from August this year - which notably pre-dates the tax bill that will be felt bigly by voters in these states - had Trump's approval at 33%, 36% and 33% respectively. [Link] Compared to his vote percentage in those three states during the election of 47%, 47% and 48% respectively, that's an "unpresidented" drop in a single year.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Seems to be working for Roy Moore. I think it will depend really on what kind of candidate the democrats put up. But I'd be surprised if Trump runs again. I'd be surprised if he even makes it to the end of his term. I expect health grounds, a quiet set down, and handover to the vice president. But it all will depend on the Muller investigation - If it turns up anything too damaging, the republican party will need to get rid of him, like they did with Nixon. Problem is, that the opposition keep focusing on the man, and not the policies. His U-Turn compared to his campaign speech on Healthcare barely gets mentioned - when in fact its the complete opposite of his campaign promise. The Republicans aren't that keen on him, and he's become something of a liability to them.
I think this will be decided by whether conservative Alabamans buy the tribal argument, hold their noses and vote for Moore, or whether they just don't show up to the polls because they can't vote for either. Dems are smelling blood and working on getting out the vote - their support is going to be highly motivated, of course. It's a special election with no other races / decisions on the ballot. Relative enthusiasm will be a significant factor as will things like the weather. In fact, Stephen Colbert commented recently that the weather forecast appears to favor Moore as, next Tuesday, it's expected to slip into the teens.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
| wordup |
|
|---|---|
|
Roy Moore praises the era of slavery, putin and says America is the focus of evil - [Link]
|
|
|
Originally posted by wordup
Roy Moore praises the era of slavery, putin and says America is the focus of evil - [Link]
None of which will matter to those who vote for him. They will vote for him because of the "R" behind his name; the man himself is an absolute horror.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by wordup
Roy Moore praises the era of slavery, putin and says America is the focus of evil - [Link] We've all paid a heavy price to protect the IOUSA petro-dollar. The sooner it ends the better.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| wordup |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Ray in Houston
None of which will matter to those who vote for him. They will vote for him because of the "R" behind his name; the man himself is an absolute horror. Yes, I think he'll win. The moral compass has well and truly gone out of the window. He'll be a liability to his party if he wins, so it balances out in a funny kind of way.
|
|
|
Originally posted by wordup
Yes, I think he'll win. The moral compass has well and truly gone out of the window. He'll be a liability to his party if he wins, so it balances out in a funny kind of way. I, too, think he'll win. I also think he'll serve in the Senate until he retires or dies (such is the state of incumbency in Congress). The immediate calculus is that his vote may well be needed to pass the reconciled tax bill that will come back to the Senate for a re-vote some time this month. That's the devil's bargain the Republican Party is making right now - the same devil's bargain they made when they embraced and enabled Trump as President. Tax cuts uber alles! Don't forget that Obamacare repeal was just a tax cut in disguise. They were going to leave the Act mostly in place and just eliminate the things that paid for it, like taxes and the individual mandate. That failed by a single vote; the current tax cut bill passed 51-49 in the Senate, including outgoing Alabama Senator Luther Strange's vote "aye". If Strange is replaced by Jones, not Moore, they're at 50-50 which is still a win with the tie being broken by Mike Pence, but it puts them in a vote crunch that gives any one Republican Senator extraordinary leverage to extract a high price for his or her vote. Even with Moore, a single flip (like Susan Collins of Maine) puts them back in the tie scenario. Without Moore, the bill would die the death of Obamacare repeal. Unlike Obamacare repeal, there isn't a time bar on them bringing this up again (and again and again) if they need to. But I'm not sure they can implement it for 2018 if it's not signed before the end of 2017.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by wordup
Yes, I think he'll win. The moral compass has well and truly gone out of the window. He'll be a liability to his party if he wins, so it balances out in a funny kind of way. Obama, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, averaged one rocket launch for every 30mins of his presidency.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| wordup |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Obama, the Nobel Peace Prize winner, averaged one rocket launch for every 30mins of his presidency. I see what you're saying, and I agree that structures are in place that essentially redistribute wealth to the rich, for instance, whoever is in power. That said, the presidency previous to Obama did that on an unthinkably huge scale and waved bye bye to several trillion that could've been used to improve the lives of Americans, instead of achieve the opposite abroad. And yes, giving Obama the Nobel Peace prize was ridiculous. Edited by wordup (08 Dec 2017 9.59pm)
|
|
| .TUX. |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by wordup
I see what you're saying, and I agree that structures are in place that essentially redistribute wealth to the rich, for instance, whoever is in power. That said, the presidency previous to Obama did that on an unthinkably huge scale and waved bye bye to several trillion that could've been used to improve the lives of Americans, instead of achieve the opposite abroad. Obama spent far more enriching the already wealthy than ANY administration before him (he as good as 'spent/borrowed' more than EVERY single President before him, doubling the National Debt!), very little of which went to those at the bottom. Scrapping the privately owned Federal Reserve would be a start (and hopefully we'd follow with the BoE).
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| wordup |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Obama spent far more enriching the already wealthy than ANY administration before him (he as good as 'spent/borrowed' more than EVERY single President before him, doubling the National Debt!), very little of which went to those at the bottom. Scrapping the privately owned Federal Reserve would be a start (and hopefully we'd follow with the BoE).
Trillions shifted hands during the Iraq years and not in the direction of anyone in need. Then again, if I'm wrong and wrong. The wealth gap in greater than ever so certainly no-one has been or is looking out for 'the little guy'. The passing of this latest tax bill is proof of that too. Though it's of course clouded by throwing an emotionally comforting bone via trumps twitter account to those who can be kept onside and disadvantaged at the same time. But the latest approval polls tell us all we need to know. Since you seem to have an out of the box view of things or are not easily swayed by 'teams', what steps do you think need to be taken to everyone the lot of the average person?
|
|
|
Looks like those pesky voters in Alabama are biased against Trump too
|
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
The USA unemployment rate is at is lowest level since the year 2000. The fall in unemployment may have started under previous administration but it's continued to fall under Trump. Now ask yourself, if you had a family to feed and where on the breadline, what would you care more about: The Democrats need to sort themselves out and realise that jobs are more important to people than anything else. Isn't it possible to care about more than one thing at a time? Is it not possible to want unemployment levels to fall AND have politicians who don't act inappropriately towards women?
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
The USA unemployment rate is at is lowest level since the year 2000. The fall in unemployment may have started under previous administration but it's continued to fall under Trump. Now ask yourself, if you had a family to feed and where on the breadline, what would you care more about:
Mate, the Republicans have literally just lost an election in one of the most Republican states in the US.
|
|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Obama spent far more enriching the already wealthy than ANY administration before him (he as good as 'spent/borrowed' more than EVERY single President before him, doubling the National Debt!), very little of which went to those at the bottom. Scrapping the privately owned Federal Reserve would be a start (and hopefully we'd follow with the BoE).
The data doesn't really back you up on Obama's tax and spending.
|
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
The USA unemployment rate is at is lowest level since the year 2000. The fall in unemployment may have started under previous administration but it's continued to fall under Trump. Now ask yourself, if you had a family to feed and where on the breadline, what would you care more about:
Have you seen Trump's tax legislation? It's a disgrace. As is his healthcare plan. The man is the biggest plutocrat in populist clothing since Nero. I feel sorry for the US middle and working classes.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Have you seen Trump's tax legislation? It's a disgrace. As is his healthcare plan. The man is the biggest plutocrat in populist clothing since Nero. I feel sorry for the US middle and working classes. You are just apart of the hyperbolic reaction against him. The only policy that Trump has come up with that I agree with is his immigration attempts.....opposed at every turn of course. That and it's obvious to see the positive affect that Trump has had on business confidence. However the most notable aspect about Trump is seeing in just how much hatred he stirs within those I hardly ever agree with. Yours and others inability to be objective over Trump marks you out as just as bad as the Republican tea party was. Just like they were with Obama, seemingly with every comment it's comparing Trump with the worse things they can think of.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by wordup
Yes, I think he'll win. The moral compass has well and truly gone out of the window. He'll be a liability to his party if he wins, so it balances out in a funny kind of way. But down he goes.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.