This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
Laughable No. It’s the truth because they are true. Obvious and in clear sight to anyone with their eyes and ears open. That I, and many millions of others, can see that is also true. That some can’t is sad, although many can, but pretend they cannot.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The people in the first are not left leaning at all! They are all traditional Republicans who voted for Trump in 2020 but won’t this time. Listen to their reasoning, which chimes with many of the things I am saying. Who published it is irrelevant. That the second is made by an outlet which has always opposed Trump is true, but to describe them as “left leaning” is a stretch. More important are the points being made, which are both hard hitting and have the truth running strongly in them. If the many Americans who were deeply concerned about having to make a choice between Biden and Trump see these kind of videos then now having Harris as the alternative to Trump is going to be reassuring. Who published it is as relevant as it every time a Daily Mail item is disparaged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it true Google has a search ban on President Donald Trump? Election interference again by big tech?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Who published it is as relevant as it every time a Daily Mail item is disparaged. It’s possible for the Mail to publish true stories and not then be “disparaged”! I pick up on their more ridiculous spins where they don’t so much as tell whoppers as to deliberately miss context or other pieces of information, thus implying a completely different interpretation. What that video was doing was showing footage of actual quotes that Trump has made. There’s no ambiguity about them. Nothing missing or other context. He said it.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It’s possible for the Mail to publish true stories and not then be “disparaged”! I pick up on their more ridiculous spins where they don’t so much as tell whoppers as to deliberately miss context or other pieces of information, thus implying a completely different interpretation. What that video was doing was showing footage of actual quotes that Trump has made. There’s no ambiguity about them. Nothing missing or other context. He said it. OK but I'm trying to remember a Mail story which wasn't dismissed.
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
———————————————————— Dan Your post is a symptom of the problem. You rightly identify a problem “hate” but then point the finger at what or who you think is to blame. Brexit and Trump are your culprits . If you want to go down the blame game there is an equally strong argument that the hate and animosity over Brexit was largely caused by the people who couldn’t and still can’t accept the result of a democratic process. There is also a valid argument that the Left are so outraged by the very existence of Trump they can’t do anything but hate him and his supporters and will do anything and everything to stop him. There are unfortunately one or two on here who seem to take politics ridiculously personally and tribally. Instead of pointing the finger let’s agree this hate comes from both sides and then becomes a vicious tit for tat circle that further amplifies it. ———————————————————————————————- Yeah, hence the hopefully it's not just lip service comment. It is exhausting all this hating the other side isn't it. Brexit exacerbated it over here and Trump has in the US over the last 4 years. It never used to be like this did it? Edited by XKudu (29 Jul 2024 12.09pm) Edited by XKudu (29 Jul 2024 12.11pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
Is it true Google has a search ban on President Donald Trump? Election interference again by big tech? No it isn’t true. It’s Musk interfering, not Google. It’s just an autocomplete feature that responds to the most searched for requests. It has no human interventions and is self taught. That it might come up with odd answers sometimes is something we have all probably experienced. By the way he isn’t President Trump. He is either former President Trump or candidate for President Trump.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
OK but I'm trying to remember a Mail story which wasn't dismissed. I haven’t commented on a Mail story for a while, certainly don’t every day and never do on sport, finances fashion, entertainment etc. So there must be 100s of stories not dismissed. Take your pick. Believing what you say to be true doesn’t mean it’s not a lie! That would be a great defence if it were.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I haven’t commented on a Mail story for a while, certainly don’t every day and never do on sport, finances fashion, entertainment etc. So there must be 100s of stories not dismissed. Take your pick. Believing what you say to be true doesn’t mean it’s not a lie! That would be a great defence if it were. Fashion, sport, etc., maybe not but any political story...
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Fashion, sport, etc., maybe not but any political story... It’s just untrue. There are political stories there today (I just looked) which I haven’t commented on anywhere. I don’t regularly look at the website. The only time I comment is when someone here uses their story as the justification for an opinion and having read it can see how it’s been spun.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It’s just untrue. There are political stories there today (I just looked) which I haven’t commented on anywhere. I don’t regularly look at the website. The only time I comment is when someone here uses their story as the justification for an opinion and having read it can see how it’s been spun. Yes. Every single time. The content is unimportant compared to the source.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Yes. Every single time. The content is unimportant compared to the source. I am certainly particularly sceptical about the Mail. Not only because it a right wing rage pretending to be a newspaper but because I have an inside track on it. My friend, who used to work there, was quite high up in the editorial team. He is a complete professional, able to take raw copy, rewrite it in the house style, extract the political points the paper would want to emphasise, remove those it didn’t and condense it to fit the space allocated. His personal politics are far removed from those of his employer but those were left at home. He though was very cynical about the paper and shared stories and frustrations. How he did it I don’t know. Why is easy. He was very well paid and good at his job. No doubt others are as biased, but my friend didn’t seem to think so.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am certainly particularly sceptical about the Mail. Not only because it a right wing rage pretending to be a newspaper but because I have an inside track on it. My friend, who used to work there, was quite high up in the editorial team. He is a complete professional, able to take raw copy, rewrite it in the house style, extract the political points the paper would want to emphasise, remove those it didn’t and condense it to fit the space allocated. His personal politics are far removed from those of his employer but those were left at home. He though was very cynical about the paper and shared stories and frustrations. How he did it I don’t know. Why is easy. He was very well paid and good at his job. No doubt others are as biased, but my friend didn’t seem to think so. Your like a sailor but replace girls for mates !
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I'm hearing that EU nationals and Europeans are being told to leave Iran. Not good news if true. ???
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
??? If true it means they expect either an attack or a round up for hostages. Human shields put in military targets Edited by HKOwen (03 Aug 2024 9.49am)
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
If true it means they expect either an attack or a round up for hostages. Human shields put in military targets Edited by HKOwen (03 Aug 2024 9.49am) Hopefully just precautionary given the unpredictability of Iran. I hear though that the Iranians will do all they can to avoid an escalation as they know they are incapable of competing and are facing political challenges at home. So any escalation would more likely come from Israel. Is that really possible at the moment? Would the Biden WH allow it during the election cycle?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.