You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Bias against Trump
November 6 2026 4.06pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Bias against Trump


Page 45 of 344 < 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 >
DaWick Flag Kingston 13 Dec 17 11.53pm

To the OP, this is The Basic. Right Wing influence and reflect the financial markets. left Wing influence and reflect the media/arts/publis sector. In the middle of all of that the world keeps turning.

 

kenbarr Flag Jackson Heights, Queens, New York ... 14 Dec 17 1.12am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Typical unprofessional cringe from Trump.

I don't know about how she handled it or who she is.

Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Dec 2017 7.51pm)

Kirsten Gillibrand is one of two United States Senators from New York. The other is Chuck Schumer. They are both Democrats. Senator Gillibrand was appointed to the Senate when Hillary Clinton became Secretary of State in 2009. Her present term is up in 2018.

 


Divorced...And LOVING it!
VJRAM Rev.
CPFC since Boxing Day 1989 CPFC 2-2 CFC
Gregg Berhalter, US International & USMNT Head Coach
Jill Ellis, England International & Retired USWNT Head Coach
Trevor Francis, International PRAT

Kermit8 Flag Hevon 14 Dec 17 9.44am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Please explain how calling someone 'Pocahontas' is racist. It will reveal the workings of your....'formally conservative' but now progressive mind.

I haven't refused to answer a question. How on earth am I'm expected to know about every situation where Trump gets involved in silly name calling?

I cited Sanders as an opponent who doesn't buy into the 'hate' opposition to Trump. I have no doubt that there are others.

What I am referring to and criticising are those that use language that far exceeds normal discourse on Trump.

Those who complain about Trump but are a bit of Trump themselves. or often in excess....Hypocrisy.


Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Dec 2017 11.49pm)

Blimey, how many misogynistic, sexually abusing, nazi-enabling bigots do you know?

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Penge Eagle Flag Beckenham 14 Dec 17 2.07pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston


Also, calling Warren "Pocahontas" is racist, so it's telling that you find it amusing.

Rubbish! Please explain how this is.

 

Stirlingsays Flag 14 Dec 17 2.37pm

Originally posted by Kermit8

Blimey, how many misogynistic, sexually abusing, nazi-enabling bigots do you know?

37.6

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Stuk Flag Top half 14 Dec 17 2.51pm

Originally posted by Penge Eagle

Rubbish! Please explain how this is.

There is a touch of the Rachel Dolezal about her claims.

 


Optimistic as ever

Ray in Houston Flag Houston 14 Dec 17 3.32pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Please explain how calling someone 'Pocahontas' is racist. It will reveal the workings of your....'formally conservative' but now progressive mind.

I haven't refused to answer a question. How on earth am I'm expected to know about every situation where Trump gets involved in silly name calling?

I cited Sanders as an opponent who doesn't buy into the 'hate' opposition to Trump. I have no doubt that there are others.

What I am referring to and criticising are those that use language that far exceeds normal discourse on Trump.

Those who complain about Trump but are a bit of Trump themselves. or often in excess....Hypocrisy.


Here we go again...

Of course, you are not expected to know every example of a response to a Trump insult. However, by making sweeping statements about such things you claim exactly that. Hence me calling you on it and you pathetically trying to dodge the issue.

As to Trump's insulting nickname for Senator Warren, that you can't figure out why it's racist speaks volumes.

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Stirlingsays Flag 14 Dec 17 3.39pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

Here we go again...

Nearly a Whitesnake fan.

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

Of course, you are not expected to know every example of a response to a Trump insult. However, by making sweeping statements about such things you claim exactly that. Hence me calling you on it and you pathetically trying to dodge the issue.

Hang on....you don't get to tell me what I claim matey boy...I do. If you have specific issues with a statement cite it and argue it.....oh hang on is 'matey boy' a sexist term?....hell I don't care if it is or not.

I never avoid questions that I know have been put to me. You might have to ask again if I miss it and you might not like the answer but I don't hide my views.

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

As to Trump's insulting nickname for Senator Warren, that you can't figure out why it's racist speaks volumes.

No, you made the claim, back it up.


Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Dec 2017 3.42pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Ray in Houston Flag Houston 14 Dec 17 3.41pm

Originally posted by Stuk

There is a touch of the Rachel Dolezal about her claims.


In her early years she claimed to be part-Native American, because she was told by her family that she was part-Native American. She has never benefitted from programs specifically for Native Americans and has since dropped the claim because she does not know if it's true or not.

Ex-Senator and ex-nude male model Scott Brown tried to use this as an issue when the two contested Brown's senate seat in 2012. She beat him 54 to 46. Warren has gone on to be a loud progressive voice in the Senate; Brown has gone on to disgrace himself as the US Ambassador to New Zealand. [Link]

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Ray in Houston Flag Houston 14 Dec 17 3.42pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

No, you made the claim, back it up.

You are a joke.

 


We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Stirlingsays Flag 14 Dec 17 3.47pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

You are a joke.

Joke racist.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Stuk Flag Top half 14 Dec 17 5.19pm

Originally posted by Ray in Houston

In her early years she claimed to be part-Native American, because she was told by her family that she was part-Native American. She has never benefitted from programs specifically for Native Americans and has since dropped the claim because she does not know if it's true or not.

Ex-Senator and ex-nude male model Scott Brown tried to use this as an issue when the two contested Brown's senate seat in 2012. She beat him 54 to 46. Warren has gone on to be a loud progressive voice in the Senate; Brown has gone on to disgrace himself as the US Ambassador to New Zealand. [Link]

I don't think that Trump referring to her as Pocahontas (who is the only famous female native American) after she erroneously, or falsely, said that she is part native American. Her story about being told that by her family is a convenience. She was making these claims well into her 40s and beyond.

It's not a racial slur toward her IMO, and neither is it detrimental to Pocahontas. It's taking the mickey out of a long standing and public mistake.

 


Optimistic as ever

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 14 Dec 17 9.05pm

Originally posted by Stuk

I don't think that Trump referring to her as Pocahontas (who is the only famous female native American) after she erroneously, or falsely, said that she is part native American. Her story about being told that by her family is a convenience. She was making these claims well into her 40s and beyond.

It's not a racial slur toward her IMO, and neither is it detrimental to Pocahontas. It's taking the mickey out of a long standing and public mistake.

Really only famous for being the Disney character. I'd like to think that the president of the US would know who Cora Anderson was, but it might be expecting a bit much for Drumpf

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 14 Dec 17 9.09pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Please explain how calling someone 'Pocahontas' is racist. It will reveal the workings of your....'formally conservative' but now progressive mind.

I haven't refused to answer a question. How on earth am I'm expected to know about every situation where Trump gets involved in silly name calling?

I cited Sanders as an opponent who doesn't buy into the 'hate' opposition to Trump. I have no doubt that there are others.

What I am referring to and criticising are those that use language that far exceeds normal discourse on Trump.

Those who complain about Trump but are a bit of Trump themselves. or often in excess....Hypocrisy.


Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Dec 2017 11.49pm)

Is it racist, maybe, maybe not, but its very demeaning and disrespectful to a person, to refer to them in such a manner rather than by their own name.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 9.16pm

Bit of a diversion, but mentioning Pocahontas reminds me of this ...
[Link]

 

wordup Flag 14 Dec 17 10.08pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Is it racist, maybe, maybe not, but its very demeaning and disrespectful to a person, to refer to them in such a manner rather than by their own name.

Racist or not, It'd be like harassing a woman by constantly calling her Rosa Parks or Laquisha if she stated that she has some black ancestry. I mean what's the point? Sure some might get a thrill out of it because they see it as being anti PC or anti progressive, but it's still pointless and mean and that shouldn't be credit to a person, or something to applaud. It's just one of the many nods and winks to a section of supporters who get off on or are comforted by demeaning certain groups of people.

It can be funny or unfunny depending of what your sense of humour is, but it's a core part of how he communicates to people about various groups and is very deliberate.


Edited by wordup (14 Dec 2017 10.09pm)

Edited by wordup (14 Dec 2017 10.14pm)

 

Stirlingsays Flag 14 Dec 17 10.08pm

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Is it racist, maybe, maybe not, but its very demeaning and disrespectful to a person, to refer to them in such a manner rather than by their own name.

Sure......it's a mockery of them and meant to offend.

That's pretty much it. Accusations of racism for stuff like that are progressive sensitivities as usual.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

wordup Flag 14 Dec 17 10.30pm

"You start out in 1954 by saying, "N*gger, n*gger, n*gger." By 1968, you can't say "n*gger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "N*gger, n*gger."

—&#8201;Lee Atw@ter, Republican Party strategist in an interview in 1981

That appears to be how political strategy and policy still works in the US today really. Of course it's mirrored on the left to some extent too. Trump's constants nods and winks and snipes at certain groups are the social component of this really, comfort to those uncomfortable with pretty basic and benign difference really. It's not particularly well disguised and is a cheap and easy way to get people onside as we see here.

Edited by wordup (14 Dec 2017 10.42pm)

 

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 14 Dec 17 10.33pm

Originally posted by wordup

You start out in 1954 by saying, "N*gger, n*gger, n*gger." By 1968, you can't say "n*gger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "N*gger, n*gger."

—&#8201;Lee At***er, Republican Party strategist in an interview in 1981

What are the missing letters?

Edited by nickgusset (14 Dec 2017 10.34pm)

 

wordup Flag 14 Dec 17 10.41pm

Originally posted by nickgusset

What are the missing letters?

Edited by nickgusset (14 Dec 2017 10.34pm)

Atw@ter :-D

 

Page 45 of 344 < 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Bias against Trump