This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by johnfirewall
Seems to be quite a right-wing rhetoric, which people find unpalatable. I'd say people need to toughen up while others will do all they can to stop anything which could have consequences for the victim in 1 in a million cases. How do we halt the increase in allergies which result from removing all possible allergens from kids diets, without risk of death? This is for scientists, not politicians. I think my comments need more elaboration. I'm not suggesting anyone is purposefully offensive towards a person or people by the way. There is insighting hatred and maliciousness which I'm not about to condone (not sure what kind of nutter would) and then there is sheltering people from ever hearing anything that challenges them in any way at all.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
Please find said remark? That's wishy washy. In an opinion piece. Please tell me it's value for money, or it's success pound for pound. Please also explain why the person in that advert is not 'normal' in your opinion but they are in the Dove advert? 1. Can't find figures for value for money or pound for pound. However Dove, as a result of the ads is one of the biggest and most successful of Unilevers brands. 2. What is normal? If the woman in the picture is normal or for the sake of argument, average sized, then how come obesity is so prevalent? If you can find any information about the tube advert being more successful than one that has taken Dove to be one of the world's top soap / cleansing brands I'd love to see it.
|
|
|
you lot are the reason a lot of people don't vote.
@sxp55555 |
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
1. Can't find figures for value for money or pound for pound. However Dove, as a result of the ads is one of the biggest and most successful of Unilevers brands. 2. What is normal? If the woman in the picture is normal or for the sake of argument, average sized, then how come obesity is so prevalent? If you can find any information about the tube advert being more successful than one that has taken Dove to be one of the world's top soap / cleansing brands I'd love to see it. Dove was successful before that campaign. It used fit, naked women to achieve it's market position. IIRC it was even one of the few TV adverts to have shown actual nudity. You used the phrase 'normal' so you must have a definition of it? That obesity is prevalent it doesn't make that the norm, or that it should become to be seen as the norm. I told you of it's success, now don't be lazy again. Back up your assertion with some facts and figures. I notice you've declined to find the reply you accused me of also. Funny that.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
Dove was successful before that campaign. It used fit, naked women to achieve it's market position. IIRC it was even one of the few TV adverts to have shown actual nudity. You used the phrase 'normal' so you must have a definition of it? That obesity is prevalent it doesn't make that the norm, or that it should become to be seen as the norm. I told you of it's success, now don't be lazy again. Back up your assertion with some facts and figures. I notice you've declined to find the reply you accused me of also. Funny that.
If you want to prove your point about the other advert being more successful, then do so. You also ascertained that the tube advert (I can't even remember what company it was for, so it's had a massive impact on me!)showed a normal woman. How is she normal in relation to the general population. Interesting that Dove actually chose to change the models they used so it would be more meaningful to most people as they could relate to it. To be fair, we're probably both as bad as each other. Edited by nickgusset (14 Jun 2016 2.25pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
If you want to prove your point about the other advert being more successful, then do so. You also ascertained that the tube advert (I can't even remember what company it was for, so it's had a massive impact on me!)showed a normal woman. How is she normal in relation to the general population. Interesting that Dove actually chose to change the models they used so it would be more meaningful to most people as they could relate to it. To be fair, we're probably both as bad as each other. Edited by nickgusset (14 Jun 2016 2.20pm) Two legs, two arms, two eyes and a bumhole. Perhaps that was a facetious answer. Sorry. Unlike me.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
Two legs, two arms, two eyes and a bumhole. Perhaps that was a facetious answer. Sorry. Unlike me.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
I was going to say minge but it was a bit crude for this site.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
I was going to say minge but it was a bit crude for this site. lady garden? Front botton? Flange?
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by blackpalacefan
if it was photoshopping i can see a reason for this but there is nothing wrong with looking after your body. banning that on posters is censoring a healthy way of living. The ban is not just about this one advert.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
If you want to prove your point about the other advert being more successful, then do so. You also ascertained that the tube advert (I can't even remember what company it was for, so it's had a massive impact on me!)showed a normal woman. How is she normal in relation to the general population. Interesting that Dove actually chose to change the models they used so it would be more meaningful to most people as they could relate to it. To be fair, we're probably both as bad as each other. Edited by nickgusset (14 Jun 2016 2.25pm) That less than 20K campaign made them millions and turned them into a global brand, from a local start-up company of about 1-2 years old. That you can't remember it doesn't matter, the media do and they keep on giving it more and more publicity. The company representatives were on all the major channels being interviewed about it, for free. Sadiq Khan has just given them another enormous free boost by picking on it for no good reason. She is normal in that she has a perfectly healthy BMI and the ASA confirmed this. If she wasn't in the bikini you'd probably just think, decent looking girl. No surgical enhancements or photoshop required. This Global nutrition report [Link] I've just read about it also states exactly what I did earlier about not allowing obesity to become the new normal. Co-chairman Lawrence Haddad said: "We now live in a world where being malnourished is the new normal. I would say Dove were doing nothing more than extending their market appeal. It's clever but it's not done to champion bigger women, it's to make more money and widen market share. We might be defining success differently, but I did state a few times that I meant pound for pound. The return on investment.
Optimistic as ever |
|
|
Originally posted by blackpalacefan
if it was photoshopping i can see a reason for this but there is nothing wrong with looking after your body. banning that on posters is censoring a healthy way of living. Plus an advert for a nutrition product with a picture of a fat bird sat in front of the box might not sell the product quite so well. I'm sure that's a point that's already been made, but you don't see many car adverts depicting a fella pushing the car up a hill and swearing under his breath or holiday adverts where it is raining and the kids are being forced into an indoor game of ping pong.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
That less than 20K campaign made them millions and turned them into a global brand, from a local start-up company of about 1-2 years old. That you can't remember it doesn't matter, the media do and they keep on giving it more and more publicity. The company representatives were on all the major channels being interviewed about it, for free. Sadiq Khan has just given them another enormous free boost by picking on it for no good reason. She is normal in that she has a perfectly healthy BMI and the ASA confirmed this. If she wasn't in the bikini you'd probably just think, decent looking girl. No surgical enhancements or photoshop required. This Global nutrition report [Link] I've just read about it also states exactly what I did earlier about not allowing obesity to become the new normal. Co-chairman Lawrence Haddad said: "We now live in a world where being malnourished is the new normal. I would say Dove were doing nothing more than extending their market appeal. It's clever but it's not done to champion bigger women, it's to make more money and widen market share. We might be defining success differently, but I did state a few times that I meant pound for pound. The return on investment. Fair enough.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Part Time James
I do accept the wider story though that some adverts don't necessarily require a skinny body image. I think the headline example with the nutrition product is one of those that a skinny lady in a bikini might be acceptable for. Which brings me back to aftershave, more often than not being sold be a bloke in a open shirt or no shirt at all. I guarantee they'll not ban any of these, which means that he's, in short, discriminating.
Optimistic as ever |
|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
Which brings me back to aftershave, more often than not being sold be a bloke in a open shirt or no shirt at all. I guarantee they'll not ban any of these, which means that he's, in short, discriminating. Not unless It's a picture of Cucking in a Pegging pose!
Pro USA & Israel |
|
|
To save everyone time...over the next eight years anything Saddiq Khan does it will be wrong because he is a Muslim.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.