You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
October 29 2026 9.40am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)


Page 616 of 1552 < 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 >
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 26 Oct 18 11.13am

Originally posted by cryrst

I stand by my own opinion of the voting requirements.
Those being aged 16-75
At 16 you need to work so that makes that argument.
At 76 you normally have retired and will be over 80 once it all comes to fruition.
Hows it going to affect you.
Dont be fooled by peoples reasons.
A lot was purely for immigration but as the environment we are in makes you a racist not many are going to fess up to it.
Bbc asked 10 people on camera to write down their reason.
5 said for trading reasons
5 said for our own laws
Not one said immigration.
What a load of twaddle.
No one would go on camera admitting it
Would you !?

You may have a point about an upper age limit although I disagree about 16. Once upon a time yes because most 16yo's worked, today they are nearly all in education so are not yet contributing so no vote as far as I am concerned.

I would have also stopped ex pat's voting. It is ridiculous that someone who left these shores 14 years ago and doesn't pay tax in the UK can still have a vote. I would say after a year unless you are armed forces you lose the vote.

Interestingly the USA demands that all citizens pay tax wherever they are domiciled or give up their citizenship. In return they are allowed to vote that seems a fairer system to me.

 


One more point

cryrst Flag The garden of England 26 Oct 18 11.21am

Originally posted by Badger11

You may have a point about an upper age limit although I disagree about 16. Once upon a time yes because most 16yo's worked, today they are nearly all in education so are not yet contributing so no vote as far as I am concerned.

I would have also stopped ex pat's voting. It is ridiculous that someone who left these shores 14 years ago and doesn't pay tax in the UK can still have a vote. I would say after a year unless you are armed forces you lose the vote.

Interestingly the USA demands that all citizens pay tax wherever they are domiciled or give up their citizenship. In return they are allowed to vote that seems a fairer system to me.

Most 16 year olda are in education because they are not given time to find a job.
How many turn 18 and are still no better in an academic form than at 16.
They should be given an allowance for say 4months, minimal just to get them used to having a bit of dough in their pocket.
That would inspire them to want to have that regularly and look for a job.
If no joy after that time then it stops and you go education or go without.

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 26 Oct 18 11.40am

Originally posted by cryrst

Most 16 year olda are in education because they are not given time to find a job.
How many turn 18 and are still no better in an academic form than at 16.
They should be given an allowance for say 4months, minimal just to get them used to having a bit of dough in their pocket.
That would inspire them to want to have that regularly and look for a job.
If no joy after that time then it stops and you go education or go without.

We should be steering them towards proper apprenticeships (not Mcapprentiships) if they are not academic. If they put the effort in then I would be happy for them to receive an allowance.

 


One more point

mezzer Flag Main Stand, Block F, Row 20 seat 1... 26 Oct 18 1.09pm

Originally posted by Pussay Patrol

OK, just got to wait 50-100 years

[Link]

Presumably you're thinking 3-5 generations ahead?

Edited by Pussay Patrol (26 Oct 2018 10.44am)

More like 4 or 5 years. That's when the next global recession will have hit and after the last round of European elections (Germany, France, Holland, Austria etc) Eurosceptic parties are now in opposition. The incumbent government always gets the blame for a recession whether it's anything to do with them or not.

So in around 5 years' time the whole Eurozone project comes under severe pressure again and this time is unlikely to survive (the electorates keep getting ignored by those who know best). By then, we may have left and experienced whatever downturns we are going to face (if we don't leave we're in a fine old mess all over again when what we strove to stay part of, disintegrates).

My guess is that if we fast forward about 10 years or so we'll be part of a European Union II consisting of us, Germany, France, the Benelux countries and one or two others.

Feel free to tell me I'm wrong then.

 


Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry.

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 26 Oct 18 1.15pm

Originally posted by mezzer

More like 4 or 5 years. That's when the next global recession will have hit and after the last round of European elections (Germany, France, Holland, Austria etc) Eurosceptic parties are now in opposition. The incumbent government always gets the blame for a recession whether it's anything to do with them or not.

So in around 5 years' time the whole Eurozone project comes under severe pressure again and this time is unlikely to survive (the electorates keep getting ignored by those who know best). By then, we may have left and experienced whatever downturns we are going to face (if we don't leave we're in a fine old mess all over again when what we strove to stay part of, disintegrates).

My guess is that if we fast forward about 10 years or so we'll be part of a European Union II consisting of us, Germany, France, the Benelux countries and one or two others.

Feel free to tell me I'm wrong then.

I would not have a problem with a Northern European trading bloc as long as we still had national sovereignty. Not everything in the current EU is bad and shared interests makes sense. Its the political side I object too.

 


One more point

becky Flag over the moon 26 Oct 18 3.08pm

Originally posted by cryrst

Most 16 year olda are in education because they are not given time to find a job.
How many turn 18 and are still no better in an academic form than at 16.
They should be given an allowance for say 4months, minimal just to get them used to having a bit of dough in their pocket.
That would inspire them to want to have that regularly and look for a job.
If no joy after that time then it stops and you go education or go without.

Or they could do what my generation did (from 13 yo as we went out to work proper at 15/16) and put down their bl**dy mobiles, get off social media and get a part-time job that will give their own money to spend. A far more worthwhile exercise than simply handing them someone else's money!

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 26 Oct 18 3.20pm

Originally posted by becky

Or they could do what my generation did (from 13 yo as we went out to work proper at 15/16) and put down their bl**dy mobiles, get off social media and get a part-time job that will give their own money to spend. A far more worthwhile exercise than simply handing them someone else's money!

I have advocated this for years. I have always said that pupils who simply have no interest in school at the age of say 14/15 be given limited job placement so they can experience getting up on sub zero mornings at 4.30am & then sitting in a traffic jam for an hour & a half before starting a days work, then experiencing that homeward bound traffic jam again.
My guess is after a week or so of this they would soon knuckle under back at school & achieve higher test results ergo better job prospects rather than leaving school with no qualifications & then labouring on construction sites for the next 40 years or flipping Burgers.

 


Pro USA & Israel

Stuk Flag Top half 26 Oct 18 3.24pm

The NFU keep harping on that there will be a shortage of fruit pickers and seasonal labour. Young people in their summer holidays or at weekends would seem ideal for this task.

 


Optimistic as ever

DanH Flag SW2 26 Oct 18 4.12pm

Originally posted by Stuk

The NFU keep harping on that there will be a shortage of fruit pickers and seasonal labour. Young people in their summer holidays or at weekends would seem ideal for this task.

What about when they're at school and it needs picking?

Good luck getting young people to do that for a pittance as well. I did it for one day when I was at school and that was more than enough.

 

cryrst Flag The garden of England 26 Oct 18 4.17pm

Originally posted by DanH

What about when they're at school and it needs picking?

Good luck getting young people to do that for a pittance as well. I did it for one day when I was at school and that was more than enough.

I think most of these companies pay above the minimum wage so i dont think its a pittance.
On tv a while back a farmer was paying nearly £11 an hour. You would struggle to get that on the high street.

 

cryrst Flag The garden of England 26 Oct 18 4.21pm

Originally posted by becky

Or they could do what my generation did (from 13 yo as we went out to work proper at 15/16) and put down their bl**dy mobiles, get off social media and get a part-time job that will give their own money to spend. A far more worthwhile exercise than simply handing them someone else's money!

Not fair at all.
The rules about now are to protect the minors and the employers.
And everyone for example, who has kids like me gets given someone elses money if thats your point.
Did you have kids.
Hows that fair on people without them.
Glass houses and all.

 

Stuk Flag Top half 26 Oct 18 4.33pm

Originally posted by DanH

What about when they're at school and it needs picking?

Good luck getting young people to do that for a pittance as well. I did it for one day when I was at school and that was more than enough.

They don't have to make up the entire workforce but for a month and half, at least, in peak season they could provide a glut of additional labour. Or 10 weeks of the 6 month season including other holidays.

And they can always reintroduce the seasonal agriculture scheme that was only dropped 5 years ago due to the availability of EU labour.

 


Optimistic as ever

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 26 Oct 18 4.38pm

Originally posted by Stuk

They don't have to make up the entire workforce but for a month and half, at least, in peak season they could provide a glut of additional labour. Or 10 weeks of the 6 month season including other holidays.

And they can always reintroduce the seasonal agriculture scheme that was only dropped 5 years ago due to the availability of EU labour.

How about offering students a discount off their tuition fees as well as pay from the farmer.

 


One more point

Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 26 Oct 18 4.42pm

Originally posted by DanH

What about when they're at school and it needs picking?

Good luck getting young people to do that for a pittance as well. I did it for one day when I was at school and that was more than enough.

Fairy

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

cryrst Flag The garden of England 26 Oct 18 4.43pm

Originally posted by Badger11

How about offering students a discount off their tuition fees as well as pay from the farmer.

Because then the left cant keep going on about how wrong it is expecting people to pay for their education.
Sensible ideas badger are not looked at.
Cmon get with the game

 

EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 26 Oct 18 5.01pm

Originally posted by becky

Or they could do what my generation did (from 13 yo as we went out to work proper at 15/16) and put down their bl**dy mobiles, get off social media and get a part-time job that will give their own money to spend. A far more worthwhile exercise than simply handing them someone else's money!

What job opportunities do you think a 16 year old in London has? Will be interested to hear your suggestions.

 

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 26 Oct 18 5.42pm

In true Brexit fashion we will become great again by having no fresh fruit and veg, there vis nothing wrong with processed peas.

According to Mrs Leadsom who knows all about farming, the solution is for farmers to by modern kit.

They apparently, have never thought of that and have not identified the suitable machinery, but what would they know.

After we have sent Jonny Foreigner EU worker home we will import slaves from Africa.

No problems at all.


 

Mapletree Flag Croydon 26 Oct 18 6.31pm

There are many reasons why the profitable farms - agribusinesses - can be long-term harmful.

For example, by demanding super sized fields there are few hedgerows and the wildlife suffers. Try visiting Eastern Germany and seeing how many birds there aren't in the countryside.

This is a whole lot more complex than making widgets.

In its wisdom, in any case, Government has decided that subsidies will be phased out in the UK between 2021 and 2027, thereby making it uneconomic against the subsidised farms in other countries. The EU, on the other hand, has no such plans.

So small farms die, agribusiness is the only way forward and productivity levels will suffer overall. Likely the soil will degrade as it is over-farmed too.

So look forward to massive fields wherever feasible and lots of low quality imports from the other side of the world. I would guess the EU will aim to sell internally, no point in going through the hassle of selling to the UK.

Edited by Mapletree (26 Oct 2018 6.32pm)

 

becky Flag over the moon 26 Oct 18 6.33pm

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

What job opportunities do you think a 16 year old in London has? Will be interested to hear your suggestions.

For part time employment they could try for

Shop work: if not supermarkets, places like bakeries generally have Saturday staff/holiday relief workers

garden centres

cafes/restaurants

leaflet distribution

or even a good old fashioned paper round.

They won't all be advertised, and sometimes you have to go hunt for them, but there are chances out there for those who really want them.


 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Stirlingsays Flag 26 Oct 18 6.33pm

Originally posted by Mapletree

There are many reasons why the profitable farms - agribusinesses - can be long-term harmful.

For example, by demanding super sized fields there are few hedgerows and the wildlife suffers. Try visiting Eastern Germany and seeing how many birds there aren't in the countryside.

This is a whole lot more complex than making widgets.

In its wisdom, in any case, Government has decided that subsidies will be phased out in the UK between 2021 and 2027, thereby making it uneconomic against the subsidised farms in other countries. The EU, on the other hand, has no such plans.

So small farms die, agribusiness is the only way forward and productivity levels will suffer overall. Likely the soil will degrade as it is over-farmed too.

So look forward to massive fields wherever feasible and lots of low quality imports from the other side of the world. I would guess the EU will aim to sell internally, no point in going through the hassle of selling to the UK.

Edited by Mapletree (26 Oct 2018 6.32pm)

You really don’t know what you are talking about on this. Stop digging.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Page 616 of 1552 < 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic