This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
The only thing personal is the fact we all want the same thing, which is goals goals goals and, good solid defending, Roy has when all fully fit a good solid bunch of defenders to pick from and he understands how to coach them into keeping us in this league which is what he's achieved very well so far improving year on year and this has been done without the very very necessity of a decent Murray/Benteke type player to make the most of any opportunities that come along high and low. Eze looks very good on the ball and Chelsea dealt with him with countless fouls when the score was 0-0 and 1-0 and 2-0, this is going to happen to him and Ayew and Zaha every game until we can find a good out and out striker to occupy opposing players away from them enough to help our attacks, this is all just to fill in the gap until our very decent manager leaves and the new one appears who I also hope will play the football you so desire. I did not mean to be personal to you or any of the other fans who want to see Mr Hodgson go, I see it as frustration on my part, often I don't even look at the poster's name when I respond at the beginning. I agree with what you say but I do consider us one dimensional in our play. Roy in my opinion is the best defensive coach in the league however this comes at the expense of our forward play. How many times have we seen matches start brightly and then before long we are defending deeper and deeper until the only offensive option we have left is the counter attack, which is normally nipped in the bud by a niggly professional foul. Once we drop off into this defensive mindset we struggle to get out of it. Chelsea played well the other day but they knew exactly what we were going to do and were prepared to stifle it. Roy has done well but until he has a noticeable plan b or plan c that he is willing to back with a swift change of personnel and set up, I believe we will continue to see the same pattern of play and more particularly against the teams that dominate possession.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Tickled pink
Mr Hodgson is not going to be around for very long, his replacement hopefully will be and then your worries about surviving can be fully debated on here with everyone's frustrations lol We are caught between devil and the deep blue sea. Yes, Roy won't be around for too much longer but you wonder what sort debacle we will get ourselves into trying to source a new manager ?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
In the final analysis, Roy Hodgson has secured PL survival in successive seasons on a relative pittance and on the back of long-term injuries. Supporters might get frustrated at the style of play and the dearth of goals but PL survival is the sole aim of the club and he has met his objectives.The end has justified the means. Unfortunately this is the bottom line. He has year on year achieved his ultimate objective. I detest his style of football. Last season was awful turning up to the ground with such apathy. I understand where we are with the owners and club yet I believe we could be doing more with what we have. Regrettably I understand why he is still with us and I am grateful for what he has done for us. I understand the risk of when he does go but I cannot help wanting more from my club in the best league in the world with all the resources and riches it brings.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Rachid Rachid Rachid
On Saturday we had four attacking players on the pitch and none of them performed. I thought all four were poor. Not down to tactics - none of them did anything with the ball and surrendered it far too easily
Whilst Roy will continue to base his systems around a sound defence (which we will have when our first choice back 4 are available - we don't have one of them in place at present except perhaps Ward because we haven't seen Ferguson yet to assess how good he actually is) the systems used in pre-season and against our first three league opponents saw us with more attacking intent than we saw last season. We were very good under Roy in the 2018/19 season away from home scoring 3 or more goals in no fewer than SIX games and Batshuayi was on loan with us for FIVE of those games and scored in three of them. Let's give Roy and the squad time to settle down and stop making judgments after a single poor performance.
|
|
|
Originally posted by doombear
Spot on Rachid. Roy was clearly annoyed after the game because the team hadn't played the way he wanted them to. Whilst Roy will continue to base his systems around a sound defence (which we will have when our first choice back 4 are available - we don't have one of them in place at present except perhaps Ward because we haven't seen Ferguson yet to assess how good he actually is) the systems used in pre-season and against our first three league opponents saw us with more attacking intent than we saw last season. We were very good under Roy in the 2018/19 season away from home scoring 3 or more goals in no fewer than SIX games and Batshuayi was on loan with us for FIVE of those games and scored in three of them. Let's give Roy and the squad time to settle down and stop making judgments after a single poor performance. Yep, I concur with that.
|
|
| BlueJay |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Frickin Saweet
surviving is not living Rome wasn't built in a day, and remaining in the PL is no easy task. He has to be given credit for keeping us in the mix. Granted he's not the most creative or experimental of managers by a long stretch and it will eventually be time to move on, but I for one don't view him in a wholly negative light.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Neilsym26
I think Simon Jordan is bang on here!! The former Eagles chairman, defended Zaha on talkSPORT, insisting the 27-year-old had no opportunity to thrive due to the way Roy Hodgson set his side up against the Blues.Chelsea for the first 28 minutes of that game had 82 per cent possession, ”Quite frankly, if I’m Wilfried Zaha, I’ll be going: ‘Roy, why are we set up this way? How am I supposed to play? Why am I even playing? Ultimately I can’t even get near it because of the way we’re set up and the way we’re playing’. Edited by Neilsym26 (06 Oct 2020 11.27am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
Have you considered that this is because we have wingers playing at centre forward. I don't think that's entirely true particularly in Ayew's case besides which any wide player would generally be expected to hit the far post when the ball is crossed from the opposite side. Nobody was complaining about the front pairing after the first two games.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
If in doubt, plunge into the offensive word pool. Most of you on here can’t debate. If someone doesn’t like your way of thinking you turn to personal abuse. Ok, hands up, that was a rant from me. But the 'Roy out' brigade are just exasperating. Every time we lose, the same hackneyed phrases are touted. "No plan b", "won't use players with flair", "Always plays his favorites", "Dinosaur", "Football has moved on" etc.&etc. Hardly any of these posters are around when we win. They never give credit for finishing mid table. It's just they don't like the style of football. Well, to be fair, nor do I mostly. But if you want to debate it, then bring something to the table. Bielsa and Santo or not available, so not worth a mention. Dyche has been mentioned I believe, but that's a 'like for like substitution' (see what I did there?), as has Howe, who got relegated recently. I'll debate if you have a suggestion as to how we move to a different phase.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
I agree with what you say but I do consider us one dimensional in our play. Roy in my opinion is the best defensive coach in the league however this comes at the expense of our forward play. How many times have we seen matches start brightly and then before long we are defending deeper and deeper until the only offensive option we have left is the counter attack, which is normally nipped in the bud by a niggly professional foul. Once we drop off into this defensive mindset we struggle to get out of it. Chelsea played well the other day but they knew exactly what we were going to do and were prepared to stifle it. Roy has done well but until he has a noticeable plan b or plan c that he is willing to back with a swift change of personnel and set up, I believe we will continue to see the same pattern of play and more particularly against the teams that dominate possession. We have issues I agree with holding the ball up and bringing the team together long enough to put teams under enough pressure to cause the sort of mistakes Chelsea capitalised on against us and have for far too long relied on Zaha to do something to create, so far this season Ayew looks a little bit lost which is a big worry because he was pivotal with many of our successes last season, I do feel though that when PVA, Schlupp, and Cahill are back and involved our attacking will improve, having said that Mitchell has really been a huge plus and it would be sad for him not to continue improving on the pitch, Sakho is a worry and I know he's come back from injury and still a bit rusty, but ...fuck me Mr Hodgson is doing a very decent job in keeping our club safe in this league which is what we need in order to attract a very decent manager to take over from him when the time happens and hopefully he'll play the sort of football we all crave, meanwhile I just hope our attacking play improves enough to keep you lot quiet lol
|
|
|
Originally posted by doombear
Whilst Roy will continue to base his systems around a sound defence (which we will have when our first choice back 4 are available - we don't have one of them in place at present except perhaps Ward because we haven't seen Ferguson yet to assess how good he actually is) the systems used in pre-season and against our first three league opponents saw us with more attacking intent than we saw last season. We were very good under Roy in the 2018/19 season away from home scoring 3 or more goals in no fewer than SIX games and Batshuayi was on loan with us for FIVE of those games and scored in three of them. Let's give Roy and the squad time to settle down and stop making judgments after a single poor performance. ..he has managed to keep and bring together a healthy string of young players for our future manager to play with when he moves on ...Eze, Riedewald, Meyer, Ferguson, Mitchell, that's quite an attractive collection to entice a good manager in.
|
|
|
Originally posted by MonsterMunch
Well last season we won 11 out of 38.. so its probably more the case we had little opportunity We flopped at the end didn't we, still eight clubs were worse then us but our ending did ruin the season somewhat unexpectedly.
|
|
| BlueJay |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
I'm frustrated at Roy's lack of ability or want to change a system mid game. 20k people shouting for a sub and roy cant see it. Are they all naive or is roy deaf. I'd say he's stuck in his ways, and it's too late in the day for him to mentally adjust.
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
I'm frustrated at Roy's lack of ability or want to change a system mid game. 20k people shouting for a sub and roy cant see it. Are they all naive or is roy deaf. Roy will never change and his methods are successful to meet the expectations of the board and owners. That’s it. Despite the better than usual transfer window, I read we spent the 18th highest on transfer fees (brighton 19th, Burnley 20th) this window. That tells you everything, just stay up is must with a cash flow like ours. The point regarding 20k fans shouting. No manager is going to be influenced by fans during a game. If he/she was, then they wouldn’t be a top flight manager for very long. Although, it would make for a great post match interview.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.