You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > London Bridge
June 12 2024 1.58pm

London Bridge

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 9 of 61 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

 

hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 04 Jun 17 9.34am

Originally posted by laddo

A lot of what Corbyn says gets twisted. The shoot to kill policy is obviously correct when people are in immediate danger, which is what corbyn said.

However, he merely suggested that it's best for this scum to face the justice of our law courts. Why? Well firstly they want to die. Why give them the satisfaction? Secondly, they hold out justice in contempt. This scum being sent down by a jury which contains women would absolutely crush them.

It's like when corbyn was criticised for saying it would have been better to arrest Bin Laden. The bloodthirsty were frothing at the mouth with rage but there's no doubt, in terms of punishment Bin Laden would have hated being put in front of judge and jury more than dying.

It comes down to justice. If you feel killing a suicide bomber is 'justice' then think carefully about their title - suicide bomber. The attackers last night knew the fake explosives would increase the likelihood of them being taken out. Sadly, they will never get their day in court although the police were absolutely right to take the course of action they did.

But he said a shoot to kill policy could be “quite dangerous" and “counterproductive”, warning that it could lead to “war on the streets” - this clearly shows the appeasement aspect of his stance. "War on the streets" indeed, that is precisely what we have, regardless of whether we shoot the fascists or not.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View lefty27's Profile lefty27 Online Flag ipswich 04 Jun 17 9.40am Send a Private Message to lefty27 Add lefty27 as a friend

Originally posted by hedgehog50

But he said a shoot to kill policy could be “quite dangerous" and “counterproductive”, warning that it could lead to “war on the streets” - this clearly shows the appeasement aspect of his stance. "War on the streets" indeed, that is precisely what we have, regardless of whether we shoot the fascists or not.

Shoot to kill, Charles Mendez springs to mind.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 04 Jun 17 9.50am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Calling for people not to debate issues on a public forum used for debate doesn't make any sense.

If you think debating these issues is disrespectful then don't be apart of the debate.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View 7mins's Profile 7mins Flag In the bush 04 Jun 17 9.53am Send a Private Message to 7mins Add 7mins as a friend

We can't stop them.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 04 Jun 17 9.54am

That's your opinion,Stirling

Politicians are in an even more public forum.Even they,except s***e like Nuttall,show some respect for the dead rather than point scoring.

Anyone who thinks any political leader of any party wouldn't have backed the three attackers being shot to kill if necessary (as it was) to save lives last night is living in a fantasy world of bias.

Edited by legaleagle (04 Jun 2017 9.59am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 04 Jun 17 9.56am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Calling for people not to debate issues on a public forum used for debate doesn't make any sense.

If you think debating these issues is disrespectful then don't be apart of the debate.

Unless children are victims.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 04 Jun 17 10.01am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by legaleagle

That's your opinion.

Politicians are in an even more public forum.Even they,except s***e like Nuttall,show some respect for the dead

I agree that he should probably suspend his campaign.

Still his platform is actually built upon taking some action on this issue unlike the others so I expect he wants to push that.

Taking action would actually do something about this cancer whilst platitudes are just that.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View lefty27's Profile lefty27 Online Flag ipswich 04 Jun 17 10.01am Send a Private Message to lefty27 Add lefty27 as a friend

This is not a political debate this is titled 'London Bridge', it happens to include a few misinformed people's opinions.
If you want to debate politics or religion maybe start a debate on the subject, you could tittle it, 'wot we gonna do wit all them foreign muslims?' Or who's better at fighting terrorists Corbyn or May?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 04 Jun 17 10.05am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

If this event had happened in the Outer f'kn Hebrides Willo would've posted similar.
You'll learn.

Yes I would have posted that my thoughts were with all those affected and condemned the atrocity in the same manner.

The fact that I have been criticized in such an appalling way speaks more about those who made these comments than 'Yours Truly'.

Now let's move on and concentrate on the subject matter.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 04 Jun 17 10.06am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by nickgusset

Unless children are victims.

No one closes down the newspapers or radio or television.

No one should be told that they shouldn't express their non violent views if they want to.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 04 Jun 17 10.06am

Originally posted by lefty27

This is not a political debate this is titled 'London Bridge', it happens to include a few misinformed people's opinions.
If you want to debate politics or religion maybe start a debate on the subject, you could tittle it, 'wot we gonna do wit all them foreign muslims?' Or who's better at fighting terrorists Corbyn or May?

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 04 Jun 17 10.08am

Originally posted by hedgehog50

But he said a shoot to kill policy could be “quite dangerous" and “counterproductive”, warning that it could lead to “war on the streets” - this clearly shows the appeasement aspect of his stance. "War on the streets" indeed, that is precisely what we have, regardless of whether we shoot the fascists or not.

I think it depends on what you mean by a shoot to kill policy. Police always shoot to kill in the UK and always have. A shoot to kill policy is about when you can shoot i.e. being able to fire on a suspect when there is no threat to life or policies like the kind used in the stockwell shooting

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 9 of 61 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > London Bridge