This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
The Wan Bissaka thread (LOCKED)
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
 Sansbup  Norfolk 26 Apr 19 9.27am |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'An insult to Wan-Bisaka' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Tickled pink
Agree with all this, sadly.
|
|
| BeckenhamSteve beckenham 02 May 19 3.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Very good news. It couldn't be much clearer than this.
|
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 02 May 19 3.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Excellent news one more season with us and if he wants to go after that then fair enough.
One more point |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 02 May 19 3.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Tipp_Eagle
A legend in the making this guy! said today that palace is where he will be next season . I reckon his statement has disappointed a lot of clubs , only 15k a week though . Give the man a pay rise Stevie . Can the club sell him without his permission ? In the old days the players would have to accept any decision or be faced being left out of the usual first 11, training with the reserves or kids etc. Clubs can’t afford to do that now and there’s risk tobthe value of their asset. In this case his asset value is likely to increase as he learns more, as long as he doesn’t get injured. In the case of Wilf I see his value dropping at some point in the near future. I don’t see many of our players objecting to moving to a bigger club anyway and nowadays the money in the next contract makes most of the decision for them. Maybe not in AWB’s case at this age but it ends up being true.
COYP |
|
| DANGERCLOSE London 15 May 19 11.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'Aaron Wan-Bissaka and Patrick van Aanholt. ' by bexleydave Defo need to keep AWB
|
|
| Omph Liverpool 22 May 19 10.43am |
|
|---|---|
|
You’re right that AWB is more marketable but by the same token that makes it more likely that Parish will hold out for something extortionate - his value is only going to appreciate. I saw 60 mill mentioned. That feels more like next years price than this but that is a reasonable position to take when there’s no need to sell. Could someone be in at that price? I’m dubious. Originally posted by Daddyorc
As much talk as there is about Zaha, I view it as more likely that we lose AWB. For Man U (or Arsenal) who are in dire need of a good right back, paying 50mm for a 21 year old, who will (hopefully) be your right back for 10 years - that may be a good price. Plus his wages are probably reasonable (for now). For Zaha, yes, he's 26, and in his prime, and he's more proven, but paying 80 - 100 million is a lot of money, and you probably have 4 good years. Plus he's going to want more wages when he signs with them. I know wingers are more valuable than right backs, but I think AWB is going and Zaha is staying.
|
|
 AERO 22 May 19 11.53am |
|
|---|---|
|
At least 40mil for Wan .Rather Lose Wan Thanks Wilf if choice far easier to replace him .
|
|
| AERO 22 May 19 11.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Sorry ! Than Wilf
|
|
| JohnB 22 May 19 12.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
If reports have any substance, then Man Utd are preparing a £25m bid. In todays market I don't think that's nearly enough. I think Palace will sell for the right price, but I think joining Utd given where they are at the moment would be a huge risk for the player. Any transfer of AWB to Utd should include the cancellation of Wilfs sell on fee to them.
|
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 22 May 19 12.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by JohnB
Any transfer of AWB to Utd should include the cancellation of Wilfs sell on fee to them. And £25 mil is derisory with the Zaha sell on fee cancelled. What if Wilf gets crocked or nobody buys him, or not until later in his career when he isn’t worth as much?
COYP |
|
| JohnB 22 May 19 2.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
And £25 mil is derisory with the Zaha sell on fee cancelled. What if Wilf gets crocked or nobody buys him, or not until later in his career when he isn’t worth as much? Oh undoubtedly, we should be pushing for closer to £50m with performance based clauses, like international appearances etc. plus the cancellation. The main thing is to make sure that at the end of the day, should we chose to sell Zaha, it's on our terms and for all the fee. You almost wouuldn't begrudge United some sort of fee if they'd added anything to his development but it's been us that's had to rebuild him from his time there.
|
|
| Maine Eagle USA 22 May 19 4.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Bangell
We've got to hold on to AWB for as long as possible. £50 million for a young and relatively inexperienced player is a lot, but he'll be worth up to triple that in five years. 150 million quid for a defender. Good grief. Honestly if United came in at 50 mil I would sell the lad, he is a fantastic prospect but there is no way we can keep him for 5 more years. That should mean we can play hard ball on Zaha and keep him at Palace for many years to come.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
Tipp_Eagle  Tipperary 22 May 19 5.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
f*** off united , he is better than any defender they have on their books .
oh yeah ,fcuk off brighton. |
|
| gregski 22 May 19 5.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Well, that's precisely the reason they want to buy him!
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.