You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Labour leadership contest.
October 30 2026 10.42am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Labour leadership contest.


Page 9 of 10 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 >
chris123 Flag hove actually 12 Feb 20 8.18pm

On the 'who would you have a beer with' test, not many of this lot.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Feb 20 8.19pm

It must be hard for them.

Trying to save criminals from deportation and deciding what constitutes a woman at the same time a choosing a lame duck leader.

 

Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 12 Feb 20 9.08pm

Originally posted by chris123

On the 'who would you have a beer with' test, not many of this lot.

Where’s Gloria de Piero when you neeeeeed her?

 


COYP

Matov Flag 12 Feb 20 9.31pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

It must be hard for them.

Trying to save criminals from deportation and deciding what constitutes a woman at the same time a choosing a lame duck leader.


LOL. Don't forget cheering on the victory of the IRA's political wing in Southern Ireland.

Labour are on course to become nothing more than a Progressive protest movement rather than an actual political party who want to form a Government.


 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Stirlingsays Flag 12 Feb 20 9.58pm

It's quite amusing really.....they have a field of crazy bints and one bloke.....and they are still going to elect the bloke.

Watching them cringe their way through these next few months will be a successful sporting event.


Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Feb 2020 10.44pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Matov Flag 12 Feb 20 10.24pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

It's quite amusing really.....their have a field of crazy bints and one bloke.....and they are still going to elect the bloke.

Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Feb 2020 9.58pm)


And a white bloke with a Knighthood. Wonderful stuff. They are going to implode as they turn on each other.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 13 Feb 20 8.36pm

I'd still absolutely wreck RLB and/or Nandy. Either both or together.

I also understand Esther McVey is in need of cheering up.

It's raining political bitches.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

silvertop Flag Portishead 13 Feb 20 9.00pm

Originally posted by Matov


And a white bloke with a Knighthood. Wonderful stuff. They are going to implode as they turn on each other.

Funny you should say that. I made a po-faced sanctimonious comment that democracy needs an effective opposition to be healthy and a hopeless imploding labour party is no answer.

However I suspect that post Brexit the ruling party's most effective opposition will be itself. All the usual fault lines barely covered by "unity" over Brexit and post landslide euphoria will be exposed and widen. In a declining economy with diminishing returns there won't he the funding to please both the new tory northern set and the traditional heartland. I think we all know which will have to give way...

 

Stirlingsays Flag 13 Feb 20 10.48pm

Originally posted by Matov


And a white bloke with a Knighthood. Wonderful stuff. They are going to implode as they turn on each other.

Who thinks that 'trans rights, are human rights'.....whatever that means?....aren't human rights just human rights and decided by humans?

An utterly meaningless trite platitude.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Matov Flag 14 Feb 20 2.12am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Who thinks that 'trans rights, are human rights'.....whatever that means?....aren't human rights just human rights and decided by humans?

An utterly meaningless trite platitude.

It might be trite but it is having an incredible impact on UK public life.

And this notion of 'self-identification' seems to be almost fantastical.

From what I can make out, and I am desperate for somebody to clarify the position for me and if neccessary put me right, if I wake up tomorrow and decide that I am a woman then under these criteria I can fully expect to be treated accordingly. No ifs, no buts, nobody able to question and enjoying the full protection of the law accordingly. I guess I could insist on seeing a Gynecologist, expect full access to all female-only spaces and generally spend hours faffing about in shoe shops before leaving with nothing to show for it and nobody would dare to perhaps suggest I was taking the piss?

Now I accept that the last part of that is a tad flippant but is it any less valid than this almost Emperors New Clothes acceptance that these people wish to make law?

Because if my definition of it is true then we might as well just accept that Western Civilisation is over. Because we not only through the looking glass but fully agreeing that 2+2=5.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Stirlingsays Flag 14 Feb 20 2.36am

You just know what's coming after the trans stuff don't yea.

If they succeed with the trans stuff you know it's next on the list.

At least you'll be hearing 'Wanna be in my gang' on the radio again......A good record is a good record.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Stirlingsays Flag 14 Feb 20 2.39am

Originally posted by Matov

It might be trite but it is having an incredible impact on UK public life.

And this notion of 'self-identification' seems to be almost fantastical.

From what I can make out, and I am desperate for somebody to clarify the position for me and if neccessary put me right, if I wake up tomorrow and decide that I am a woman then under these criteria I can fully expect to be treated accordingly. No ifs, no buts, nobody able to question and enjoying the full protection of the law accordingly. I guess I could insist on seeing a Gynecologist, expect full access to all female-only spaces and generally spend hours faffing about in shoe shops before leaving with nothing to show for it and nobody would dare to perhaps suggest I was taking the piss?

Now I accept that the last part of that is a tad flippant but is it any less valid than this almost Emperors New Clothes acceptance that these people wish to make law?

Because if my definition of it is true then we might as well just accept that Western Civilisation is over. Because we not only through the looking glass but fully agreeing that 2+2=5.

I reckon if Keir Starmer decides to identify as a woman he'll wrap the leadership contest up tomorrow.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

cryrst Flag The garden of England 14 Feb 20 5.47am

Originally posted by silvertop

Funny you should say that. I made a po-faced sanctimonious comment that democracy needs an effective opposition to be healthy and a hopeless imploding labour party is no answer.

However I suspect that post Brexit the ruling party's most effective opposition will be itself. All the usual fault lines barely covered by "unity" over Brexit and post landslide euphoria will be exposed and widen. In a declining economy with diminishing returns there won't he the funding to please both the new tory northern set and the traditional heartland. I think we all know which will have to give way...

Wheres hadrian when you need him.
Watford to cambridge might be a good place.

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 14 Feb 20 8.08am

Originally posted by Matov

It might be trite but it is having an incredible impact on UK public life.

And this notion of 'self-identification' seems to be almost fantastical.

From what I can make out, and I am desperate for somebody to clarify the position for me and if neccessary put me right, if I wake up tomorrow and decide that I am a woman then under these criteria I can fully expect to be treated accordingly. No ifs, no buts, nobody able to question and enjoying the full protection of the law accordingly. I guess I could insist on seeing a Gynecologist, expect full access to all female-only spaces and generally spend hours faffing about in shoe shops before leaving with nothing to show for it and nobody would dare to perhaps suggest I was taking the piss?

Now I accept that the last part of that is a tad flippant but is it any less valid than this almost Emperors New Clothes acceptance that these people wish to make law?

Because if my definition of it is true then we might as well just accept that Western Civilisation is over. Because we not only through the looking glass but fully agreeing that 2+2=5.

So someone who is biologically born one sex can self identify as another and we are supposed to celebrate this. However I noticed that recently there were a couple of cases of white people who self identify as black and the same cheerleaders, well, they weren't cheering in fact they were complaining.

I don't get the logic of that. If we go down the road of people being able to make up who they want to be surely that must include race as well as gender.

Sigh.

Edited by Badger11 (14 Feb 2020 8.09am)

 


One more point

ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 14 Feb 20 8.27am

Originally posted by Badger11

So someone who is biologically born one sex can self identify as another and we are supposed to celebrate this. However I noticed that recently there were a couple of cases of white people who self identify as black and the same cheerleaders, well, they weren't cheering in fact they were complaining.

I don't get the logic of that. If we go down the road of people being able to make up who they want to be surely that must include race as well as gender.

Sigh.

Edited by Badger11 (14 Feb 2020 8.09am)

I think that is just called acting. May as well star in 'It ain't half hot mum'. I agree, however, that young people choosing to be whatever gender (and there are a gazillion stupid genders now) is just ridiculous. I'm hoping it's just a fad, like the gay TV presenter thing that left us with Julian Clarey and Graham Norton.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 14 Feb 20 8.40am

Originally posted by ASCPFC

I think that is just called acting. May as well star in 'It ain't half hot mum'. I agree, however, that young people choosing to be whatever gender (and there are a gazillion stupid genders now) is just ridiculous. I'm hoping it's just a fad, like the gay TV presenter thing that left us with Julian Clarey and Graham Norton.

I heard some "expert" say there are 7 genders? I have no idea what they are, to me there are 3 that I could recognise:

Male
Female
Intersex (both male and female organs)

Everything else is just a variation of those. Gender neutral is a load of rubbish.

 


One more point

Stirlingsays Flag 14 Feb 20 9.11am

Originally posted by Badger11

I heard some "expert" say there are 7 genders? I have no idea what they are, to me there are 3 that I could recognise:

Male
Female
Intersex (both male and female organs)

Everything else is just a variation of those. Gender neutral is a load of rubbish.

Personally I don't regard Intersex as a third sex.

Nature only has a blueprint of two sexes.....I don't think we can call pretty rare variations a third sex.....they are more flukes and exist as the biological variation which is part of evolution.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

W12 14 Feb 20 9.45am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Personally I don't regard Intersex as a third sex.

Nature only has a blueprint of two sexes.....I don't think we can call pretty rare variations a third sex.....they are more flukes and exist as the biological variation which is part of evolution.

Yes, unfortunately you would have to consider this (intersex) a rare and varied type of mutation.

 

Stirlingsays Flag 14 Feb 20 9.50am

Originally posted by W12

Yes, unfortunately you would have to consider this (intersex) a rare and varied type of mutation.

Indeed, when someone is born with extra or less organs or limbs elsewhere we don't tend to think it's deliberate.

We just recognise it for what it is....the variation that happens once in a while from the complex dna merging process.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Feb 2020 9.53am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Midlands Eagle Flag 14 Feb 20 10.14am

Originally posted by Badger11

I noticed that recently there were a couple of cases of white people who self identify as black

Ali G has a lot to answer for

 

Page 9 of 10 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Labour leadership contest.