World War III

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

World War III

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 9 of 11 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Jan 20 9.55am
I wouldn't be hugely surprised by strikes on missile sites. On one of the next few nights perhaps? Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Jan 20 9.55am

I wouldn't be hugely surprised by strikes on missile sites. On one of the next few nights perhaps?

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 08 Jan 20 10.19am
Originally posted by ASCPFC I wouldn't be hugely surprised by strikes on missile sites. On one of the next few nights perhaps? Yep, if I'm Israel I know that I need the Iranian regime to change to a far less confrontational one.....If I'm Saudi I know that I need the Iranian regime to change to be the main hegemon in the region. That said, this isn't really the way to go about it.....unless you are planning to severely damage the Iranian military and then get your internal insurgents to take over. For that you'd need at least a main general in your pocket. I don't see it.....but if that was going to happen it would happen soon. Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jan 2020 11.32am) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

08 Jan 20 10.19am

Originally posted by ASCPFC

I wouldn't be hugely surprised by strikes on missile sites. On one of the next few nights perhaps?

Yep, if I'm Israel I know that I need the Iranian regime to change to a far less confrontational one.....If I'm Saudi I know that I need the Iranian regime to change to be the main hegemon in the region.

That said, this isn't really the way to go about it.....unless you are planning to severely damage the Iranian military and then get your internal insurgents to take over.

For that you'd need at least a main general in your pocket.

I don't see it.....but if that was going to happen it would happen soon.

Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jan 2020 11.32am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jan 20 10.33am
Originally posted by cryrst Imminent doesnt have to be in five minutes. If this salami dude had plans to do harm then it's likely the usa knew. 007 isnt all fiction. I think the real point has been overlooked here and that the way the US has presented it has caused that quite deliberately. Soleimani's assassination would not stop any kind of planned attack! He might have been the current and revered commander but they already have a new one. Who knows, he might be even more aggressive and with the people now demanding blood more likely to carry it out. And it was an assassination. I heard a US spokesperson claim that the UN has classified him as a terrorist and therefore a legitimate target but that's untrue. He, and his organisation, were subject to sanctions and scrutiny but only the US and the EU had classified him as a terrorist. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 08 Jan 20 10.33am

Originally posted by cryrst

Imminent doesnt have to be in five minutes.
If this salami dude had plans to do harm then it's likely the usa knew.
007 isnt all fiction.

I think the real point has been overlooked here and that the way the US has presented it has caused that quite deliberately.

Soleimani's assassination would not stop any kind of planned attack! He might have been the current and revered commander but they already have a new one. Who knows, he might be even more aggressive and with the people now demanding blood more likely to carry it out.

And it was an assassination. I heard a US spokesperson claim that the UN has classified him as a terrorist and therefore a legitimate target but that's untrue. He, and his organisation, were subject to sanctions and scrutiny but only the US and the EU had classified him as a terrorist.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Jan 20 11.30am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle I think the real point has been overlooked here and that the way the US has presented it has caused that quite deliberately. Soleimani's assassination would not stop any kind of planned attack! He might have been the current and revered commander but they already have a new one. Who knows, he might be even more aggressive and with the people now demanding blood more likely to carry it out. And it was an assassination. I heard a US spokesperson claim that the UN has classified him as a terrorist and therefore a legitimate target but that's untrue. He, and his organisation, were subject to sanctions and scrutiny but only the US and the EU had classified him as a terrorist. So, by our own definition, he was a terrorist. Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Jan 20 11.30am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I think the real point has been overlooked here and that the way the US has presented it has caused that quite deliberately.

So, by our own definition, he was a terrorist.

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 08 Jan 20 11.30am
I really couldn't give a monkey's about what the UN thinks about anything at all. It serves a purpose for countries to meet and negotiate but essentially its main useful purpose is as a focal point for global aid projects.....the ones that I agree with that is. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

08 Jan 20 11.30am

I really couldn't give a monkey's about what the UN thinks about anything at all.

It serves a purpose for countries to meet and negotiate but essentially its main useful purpose is as a focal point for global aid projects.....the ones that I agree with that is.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Jan 20 11.32am
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Yep, if I'm Israel I know that I need the Iranian regime to change to a far less confrontational one.....If I'm Saudi I know that I need the Iranian regime to change to be the main hegemon in the region. That said, this isn't really the way to go about it.....unless you are planning to severely damage the Iranian military and then get your internal insurgents to take over. For that you'd need at least a main general in your pocket. I don't see it.....but if that was going to happen it'd happen soon. Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jan 2020 10.20am) The Israeli and Saudi points are interesting. Military strikes will have to come from US forces though, I would have thought. Iran has a decent air defence system. Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Jan 20 11.32am

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

That said, this isn't really the way to go about it.....unless you are planning to severely damage the Iranian military and then get your internal insurgents to take over.

For that you'd need at least a main general in your pocket.

I don't see it.....but if that was going to happen it'd happen soon.

Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jan 2020 10.20am)

The Israeli and Saudi points are interesting. Military strikes will have to come from US forces though, I would have thought. Iran has a decent air defence system.

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 08 Jan 20 11.39am
Originally posted by ASCPFC The Israeli and Saudi points are interesting. Military strikes will have to come from US forces though, I would have thought. Iran has a decent air defence system. If the US and Israelis wanted to do it, they would do it. If the air defence system couldn't be knocked out it could be overwhelmed. Just a matter of will....but that will isn't really there....unless you're this Salami guy. Back to fermenting insurgency me thinks. Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jan 2020 11.40am) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

08 Jan 20 11.39am

Originally posted by ASCPFC

The Israeli and Saudi points are interesting. Military strikes will have to come from US forces though, I would have thought. Iran has a decent air defence system.

If the US and Israelis wanted to do it, they would do it. If the air defence system couldn't be knocked out it could be overwhelmed.

Just a matter of will....but that will isn't really there....unless you're this Salami guy.

Back to fermenting insurgency me thinks.

Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Jan 2020 11.40am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jan 20 2.06pm
Whether anyone "cares a monkey's" about what the UN thinks is beside the point. When a US spokesperson lies about them and suggests he was considered a terrorist by them is the whole point. Making false claims is promoting fake news. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 08 Jan 20 2.06pm

Whether anyone "cares a monkey's" about what the UN thinks is beside the point.

When a US spokesperson lies about them and suggests he was considered a terrorist by them is the whole point.

Making false claims is promoting fake news.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 08 Jan 20 2.45pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Whether anyone "cares a monkey's" about what the UN thinks is beside the point. When a US spokesperson lies about them and suggests he was considered a terrorist by them is the whole point. Making false claims is promoting fake news. Did you know about him20 years ago as well. It seems like you think he was an 'ok' kind of guy. He would have had your throat cut soon as look at you. We in the west need to wake up as this is more than oil. Its religion based.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 08 Jan 20 2.45pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Whether anyone "cares a monkey's" about what the UN thinks is beside the point.

When a US spokesperson lies about them and suggests he was considered a terrorist by them is the whole point.

Making false claims is promoting fake news.

Did you know about him20 years ago as well.
It seems like you think he was an 'ok' kind of guy.
He would have had your throat cut soon as look at you.
We in the west need to wake up as this is more than oil.
Its religion based.

Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman Caterham 08 Jan 20 3.39pm
Originally posted by cryrst Did you know about him20 years ago as well. It seems like you think he was an 'ok' kind of guy. He would have had your throat cut soon as look at you. We in the west need to wake up as this is more than oil. Its religion based. Before or as Wisbech or Corbyn tries to hug him or teach him? COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

Rudi Hedman

Caterham 08 Jan 20 3.39pm

Originally posted by cryrst

Did you know about him20 years ago as well.
It seems like you think he was an 'ok' kind of guy.
He would have had your throat cut soon as look at you.
We in the west need to wake up as this is more than oil.
Its religion based.

Before or as Wisbech or Corbyn tries to hug him or teach him?

COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jan 20 6.20pm
Originally posted by cryrst Did you know about him20 years ago as well. It seems like you think he was an 'ok' kind of guy. He would have had your throat cut soon as look at you. We in the west need to wake up as this is more than oil. Its religion based. From all I have learned in the last few days it seems as though he was a thoroughly indoctrinated guy who was capable of inspiring other indoctrinated guys. My point had nothing to do with him, or what I think of him. It was only concerned about the way the Trump administration has lied in the way it has tried to justify their actions. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle

Truro Cornwall 08 Jan 20 6.20pm

Originally posted by cryrst

From all I have learned in the last few days it seems as though he was a thoroughly indoctrinated guy who was capable of inspiring other indoctrinated guys.

My point had nothing to do with him, or what I think of him.

It was only concerned about the way the Trump administration has lied in the way it has tried to justify their actions.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst The garden of England 08 Jan 20 9.36pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle From all I have learned in the last few days it seems as though he was a thoroughly indoctrinated guy who was capable of inspiring other indoctrinated guys. My point had nothing to do with him, or what I think of him. It was only concerned about the way the Trump administration has lied in the way it has tried to justify their actions. So what did you think of him then? Give the sympathy for a terrorist who would gladly kill any westerners a rest. An Indoctrinated guy who was 62 and clever enough to know what he was involved in was wrong; if your portrayal is at all near the mark which I doubt. You are coming across as a terrorist sympathiser so this isnt the forum you need. Try the BBS, I'm sure you would be accepted and agreed with. I suppose the police should have guessed the london bridge attackers were wearing fake vests so not killing them. As well as the recent terrorist shot to bits. Are you really concerned about the 'lies' or is it your anti trump bias causing your angst. Dont hear much about Pelosi not carrying on with the impeachment but hey now you can tell me it's not this thread.
Alert a moderator to this post

cryrst

The garden of England 08 Jan 20 9.36pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

From all I have learned in the last few days it seems as though he was a thoroughly indoctrinated guy who was capable of inspiring other indoctrinated guys.

My point had nothing to do with him, or what I think of him.

It was only concerned about the way the Trump administration has lied in the way it has tried to justify their actions.

So what did you think of him then?
Give the sympathy for a terrorist who would gladly kill any westerners a rest.
An Indoctrinated guy who was 62 and clever enough to know what he was involved in was wrong; if your portrayal is at all near the mark which I doubt.
You are coming across as a terrorist sympathiser so this isnt the forum you need.
Try the BBS, I'm sure you would be accepted and agreed with.
I suppose the police should have guessed the london bridge attackers were wearing fake vests so not killing them.
As well as the recent terrorist shot to bits.
Are you really concerned about the 'lies' or is it your anti trump bias causing your angst.
Dont hear much about Pelosi not carrying on with the impeachment but hey now you can tell me it's not this thread.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 9 of 11 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

World War III

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors