You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Moving statues
June 11 2024 2.25am

Moving statues

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 9 of 32 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

 

View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Jul 21 10.14am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

The truth is that you pick and choose what to consider as genuine evidence based on whether it fits your agenda. Meanwhile we are putting up a statue in honour of a terrorist, racist, incitor of murder and your dissembling can't hide that fact.

Edited by georgenorman (13 Jul 2021 9.17am)

BS. I regard anything for which there is evidence as trustworthy, whether I like the conclusion or not.

The same rule applies to evidence free assertions, or claims from potentially compromised sources, which I don't trust. I make no judgements on this guy. I just say we don't really know because we have no way of knowing.

He might be all the things you say he is. But it is also quite possible that he isn't.

Whether we should raise a statue to him is a completely separate matter. My own view is that it is inappropriate, but not because of your claims.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View georgenorman's Profile georgenorman Flag 13 Jul 21 10.37am Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

BS. I regard anything for which there is evidence as trustworthy, whether I like the conclusion or not.

The same rule applies to evidence free assertions, or claims from potentially compromised sources, which I don't trust. I make no judgements on this guy. I just say we don't really know because we have no way of knowing.

He might be all the things you say he is. But it is also quite possible that he isn't.

Whether we should raise a statue to him is a completely separate matter. My own view is that it is inappropriate, but not because of your claims.

What is this BS that you keep putting, 'biased scepticism'?
Why do you think putting up a statue to Chilebmwe is inappropriate?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Matov's Profile Matov Flag 13 Jul 21 11.08am Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

All in favour of this statue going up. Will stimulate this debate on a national level. And allow white people to see what the future holds for them with the likes of Khan in a position of power.

All for the good.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 13 Jul 21 11.42am Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

BS. I regard anything for which there is evidence as trustworthy, whether I like the conclusion or not.

The same rule applies to evidence free assertions, or claims from potentially compromised sources, which I don't trust. I make no judgements on this guy. I just say we don't really know because we have no way of knowing.

He might be all the things you say he is. But it is also quite possible that he isn't.

Whether we should raise a statue to him is a completely separate matter. My own view is that it is inappropriate, but not because of your claims.

Why do you pick this particular thread to question evidence when you beleive everything bad about trump even though lots of it comes from a bias source.
Bit of double standards don't you think!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Jul 21 12.07pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

What is this BS that you keep putting, 'biased scepticism'?
Why do you think putting up a statue to Chilebmwe is inappropriate?

You don't need me to tell you what bs is! You are an expert.

Putting up a statue to someone who has no direct connection to us, when there are many other candidates whose contributions to our country have established merit, seems strange.

If he deserves to be recognised, and I pass no comment on that, then it would be appropriate in his home country

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Jul 21 12.12pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Why do you pick this particular thread to question evidence when you beleive everything bad about trump even though lots of it comes from a bias source.
Bit of double standards don't you think!

You don't need any evidence other than that which came, and continues to come, from Trump himself to reach a conclusion. Anything else was just confirmation.

The biggest biased source was always Trump. Nothing else came near.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View georgenorman's Profile georgenorman Flag 13 Jul 21 12.40pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

You don't need me to tell you what bs is! You are an expert.

Putting up a statue to someone who has no direct connection to us, when there are many other candidates whose contributions to our country have established merit, seems strange.

If he deserves to be recognised, and I pass no comment on that, then it would be appropriate in his home country

Opinion seems to be divided. You don't think that it is inappropriate to erect a statue in honour of someone because he was, beyond reasonable doubt, a racist, terrorist and instigator of murder - and the rest of the world does think it inappropriate.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 13 Jul 21 12.43pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

You don't need me to tell you what bs is! You are an expert.

Putting up a statue to someone who has no direct connection to us, when there are many other candidates whose contributions to our country have established merit, seems strange.

If he deserves to be recognised, and I pass no comment on that, then it would be appropriate in his home country

That’s fair enough. It’s moot anyway because this is happening regardless.
Who would people nominate?
I’d go for the ladies of the SOE who were astonishingly brave. Or Robert Hooke who deserves more recognition than he gets.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 13 Jul 21 12.44pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

if Nelson Mandela gets a statue, then we should also furnish Trafalgar Square with a statue of Gerry Adams.

just for the sake of Balance.

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Jul 21 2.17pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

Opinion seems to be divided. You don't think that it is inappropriate to erect a statue in honour of someone because he was, beyond reasonable doubt, a racist, terrorist and instigator of murder - and the rest of the world does think it inappropriate.

Who has determined it is beyond a reasonable doubt? A colonial Court set up for the purpose is hardly reliable, is it? Anyone else?

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View georgenorman's Profile georgenorman Flag 13 Jul 21 2.28pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Who has determined it is beyond a reasonable doubt? A colonial Court set up for the purpose is hardly reliable, is it? Anyone else?

The Nyasaland Rising Commission of Inquiry, 1915, 62 witnesses. There is no reason to suppose that it is unreliable apart from your prejudice.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 13 Jul 21 3.11pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

The Nyasaland Rising Commission of Inquiry, 1915, 62 witnesses. There is no reason to suppose that it is unreliable apart from your prejudice.

There is every reason to suspect it was unreliable, if those witnesses were cherry-picked, as I strongly suspect they were.

How many came from the uprising side of the argument, and how many from the controlling ethnic group?

This was Empire. You didn't find fault with those who ran it, as that would defeat its credibility and encourage rebellion. You backed those you put in charge.

Prejudice? You are demonstrating it in spades by failing to understand the context of the event.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 9 of 32 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Moving statues