This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by pstrutt
And the fans will flock from everywhere to fill the seats to see ... Sully Kai Kai? Kai Kai is a youth player that doesn’t play for the first team , but no fans flock to come and see prem football , and the whole side , they don’t come to just see Zaha , plus if we sold zaha I think you know that we would replace him.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle If a potential move is not about money ( which I don't think it is ) then I would say some things have changed over the last week or so. Firstly we have made two very good signings. And possibly more to come. Secondly, if Spurs are now out of the picture that just leaves Chelsea. No Champions League football this season and although it was only a glorified friendly, they looked way off of the pace yesterday and with a new manager as well. Wilf would be walking into what could quickly become a toxic situation there.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle Let’s not forget we released Sako a few weeks back. Why would we have released him if we were seriously considering Wilf?! Just plain daft ...
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
michaelpearce ![]() |
|
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle the papers have changed there mind they dont want to sell him to spurs so now its Chelsea who offers 30 mil, and the wright ups says it all the former man utd star when did that happen,the truth mustn't get in the way of a good lie. Edited by michaelpearce (06 Aug 2018 9.39am)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by KAOS
Let’s not forget we released Sako a few weeks back. Why would we have released him if we were seriously considering Wilf?! Just plain daft ... We offered Sako a new contract and he didn’t sign it ....
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by comeonyoueagles20
We offered Sako a new contract and he didn’t sign it .... Different terms tho by all accounts ...
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by KAOS
Different terms tho by all accounts ... Yes , but that still means we didn’t release him and attempted to keep him at the club.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle I doubt if the new Chelsea manager has seen Wilf play live, and if he goes along with his Board's wishes by making a bid then Chelsea will not be "his team". I think he has bigger things on his plate at the moment - keeping Hazzard and Willian for a start. I think the mid-season window is much more likely.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by comeonyoueagles20
Yes , but that still means we didn’t release him and attempted to keep him at the club. My point was if we were / or have been thinking of selling Wilf 'maybe' letting Sako go was a bit hasty, or not if we know Wilf is staying ...
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by KAOS
My point was if we were / or have been thinking of selling Wilf 'maybe' letting Sako go was a bit hasty, or not if we know Wilf is staying ... Sako is probably a bit deluded regarding how much a player on the bench doing nothing should be paid after a few years of receiving £60k for virtually nothing. It was the right decision.
COYP |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Sako is probably a bit deluded regarding how much a player on the bench doing nothing should be paid after a few years of receiving £60k for virtually nothing. It was the right decision. Don't disagree but he was proving more than useful before that final injury last season.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by KAOS
Don't disagree but he was proving more than useful before that final injury last season. High propensity to be injured and therefore the right call. He’s still a free agent!
COYP |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.