That looks like a somewhat careless statement made for the best of intentions at a time when overcoming vaccine hesitancy was of paramount consideration.

[Link]

I asked ChatGPT whether Wisbech was left-wing, it responded with:

"Wisbech is a market town in the county of Cambridgeshire, England. It would be incorrect to categorize an entire town as left-wing or right-wing, as political ideologies and leanings can vary among the residents. Political affiliations and ideologies tend to be diverse within any community, and it is likely that Wisbech, like many other towns, has a mix of political perspectives. To understand the political leanings of individuals in Wisbech, it would be necessary to consider local election results, polling data, and the views of residents through surveys or interviews."

This answer seems to indicate that AI doesn't know its backside from a hole in the ground.

Deliberate misinformation, not in my book. When you are trying to encourage people to do what is considered by all your experts to be in their best interests I can see how in an unguarded moment a slip of the tongue occurs. We all do that. Those who live in glass houses ...................

You asked if the public were told vaccination would prevent transmission and I've given two examples which have both been brushed off.

You litterally argued against this idea the whole thread. You argued against people deciding for themselves on what to or what not to put in their body.

Anyways fact checkers clearly have agendas they are clearly paid and told what to "fact check"

What I actually wrote was "Were vaccinated people told they were safe from transmitting the virus? Or were they told the vaccines would stop the transmissions? "

Not prevent transmissions. They would, in time, have stopped the original strain, by establishing herd immunity Things changed when the variants emerged, so the advice needed to as well.