You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Venezuela - socialist paradise
June 18 2019 4.23am

Venezuela - socialist paradise

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 4 of 14 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

 

stevegood Flag 05 Nov 15 2.34pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 05 Nov 2015 10.03am

Quote stevegood at 04 Nov 2015 11.03am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Nov 2015 10.54am

Quote matt_himself at 04 Nov 2015 8.26am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Nov 2015 8.14am

Quote matt_himself at 03 Nov 2015 10.31pm

Quote leifandersonshair at 03 Nov 2015 7.08pm

The politics and the system work- but, as Serial notes, state socialism is unsustainable in the current global climate of unfettered capitalism. Just as, in a world of successful socialist states, the single capitalist country would inevitably fail.

Calling socialism 'mumbo jumbo' is lazy and no real argument. Capitalism is a bunch of old hogwash. See? I can do it too!


Please provide an example of where the politics and system work in a socialist state, where living standards are raised consistently and where democracy thrives.

Venezuela would probably fit that bill. Do you include Sweden?


Edited by jamiemartin721 (04 Nov 2015 8.14am)

Please provide evidence that Venezuela is democratic. From everything I have read, the government there is doing a lot of things to restrict freedom that if they happened elsewhere, you and your sort would be up in arms over.

Sweden isn't socialist. You can delude yourself that the 'Nordic model' is socialism but it clearly isn't. It is a free market economy, highly taxed and with a social safety net. It is not socialist by definition.

Indeed, but its still democratic. In the same way we're democratic, whilst fitting into a system that favours the dominant party. We have a system where 15% of the electorate (roughly) vote for the Greens and UKIP (they got a seat each) - Hardly a fair model when you consider the votes the Liberal Democrats received was at least half that, and they got 8 seats.

Hardly a fair system either.

Sweden
Its definitely not a free market model either though, Sweden, there are a lot of social restrictions placed on companies to require them to fulfil commitments to the state and society, but it fulfils what I feel the a socialist model should represent. Socialism should provides a critique of capitalism, and in Sweden, and several other European countries, this influence of socialism has resulted in a curtailing of the failures and dangers of capitalist ideology as seen in far more free market models.


You talk about 'social restrictions', 'a critique of capitalism' and 'a socialist model'. In fact it is just a democratically elected government passing laws that they think benefit society - just as we have done in this country over the years. It is not socialism at all. Sweden would quickly go down the pan if all means of production, distribution and exchange were in the hands of the state.



This is how I see socialism as a working model within a capitalist world
, as a means of social provision. I don't really abide by the idea of communism at all, which promotes tyranny, but the idea of the will of the people and the state serving the best interest of society.

In terms of socialism, I regard the vanguard approach of Marxist-Lenninism and Moaists as being a 'failed experiement' as it forces socialism by force of arms and tyranny, but proscribe to the approach of Marx where in Socialism must grow out of the failures of capitalism by the will of the people as a social change (similar to how capitalism grew out of the industrial revolution and the demise of agrarianism, which replaced feudalism).

Sweden also requires very strict laws on the economic stability of companies, that would be considered Marxist by any other standards, that are specifically devised towards ensuring a company security for the benefit of employees and the state, rather than the directors.

so for me, Sweden represents the way forwards, capitalism coupled to a social or socialist priority. I believe in the freedom of the individual (being more of an anarchist than a commie), and democracy that represents each and every single person. These I feel are vital to prevent tyranny of the majority (which communism, represents).

As for the UK passing laws for the benefit of society, that I disagree with, for most of my life I would say we pass laws based on maintaining the support of the parties voters, and primiarly the interests of corporations.


If you don't nationalise all means of production distribution and exchanges, then it is not Socialist.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Lyons550's Profile Lyons550 Flag Shirley 05 Nov 15 2.48pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Quote chris123 at 05 Nov 2015 7.49am

Venezuela has the world's highest rate of inflation, at 100% and forecast to hit 150% by the end of the year. The exchange rate is shot, hyper inflation just around the corner - with such an abundance of natural resources, this is some feat.


Surely Zimbabwe's inflation rate is higher!?

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View chris123's Profile chris123 Flag hove actually 05 Nov 15 2.51pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote stevegood at 05 Nov 2015 2.34pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 05 Nov 2015 10.03am

Quote stevegood at 04 Nov 2015 11.03am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Nov 2015 10.54am

Quote matt_himself at 04 Nov 2015 8.26am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 04 Nov 2015 8.14am

Quote matt_himself at 03 Nov 2015 10.31pm

Quote leifandersonshair at 03 Nov 2015 7.08pm

The politics and the system work- but, as Serial notes, state socialism is unsustainable in the current global climate of unfettered capitalism. Just as, in a world of successful socialist states, the single capitalist country would inevitably fail.

Calling socialism 'mumbo jumbo' is lazy and no real argument. Capitalism is a bunch of old hogwash. See? I can do it too!


Please provide an example of where the politics and system work in a socialist state, where living standards are raised consistently and where democracy thrives.

Venezuela would probably fit that bill. Do you include Sweden?


Edited by jamiemartin721 (04 Nov 2015 8.14am)

Please provide evidence that Venezuela is democratic. From everything I have read, the government there is doing a lot of things to restrict freedom that if they happened elsewhere, you and your sort would be up in arms over.

Sweden isn't socialist. You can delude yourself that the 'Nordic model' is socialism but it clearly isn't. It is a free market economy, highly taxed and with a social safety net. It is not socialist by definition.

Indeed, but its still democratic. In the same way we're democratic, whilst fitting into a system that favours the dominant party. We have a system where 15% of the electorate (roughly) vote for the Greens and UKIP (they got a seat each) - Hardly a fair model when you consider the votes the Liberal Democrats received was at least half that, and they got 8 seats.

Hardly a fair system either.

Sweden
Its definitely not a free market model either though, Sweden, there are a lot of social restrictions placed on companies to require them to fulfil commitments to the state and society, but it fulfils what I feel the a socialist model should represent. Socialism should provides a critique of capitalism, and in Sweden, and several other European countries, this influence of socialism has resulted in a curtailing of the failures and dangers of capitalist ideology as seen in far more free market models.


You talk about 'social restrictions', 'a critique of capitalism' and 'a socialist model'. In fact it is just a democratically elected government passing laws that they think benefit society - just as we have done in this country over the years. It is not socialism at all. Sweden would quickly go down the pan if all means of production, distribution and exchange were in the hands of the state.



This is how I see socialism as a working model within a capitalist world
, as a means of social provision. I don't really abide by the idea of communism at all, which promotes tyranny, but the idea of the will of the people and the state serving the best interest of society.

In terms of socialism, I regard the vanguard approach of Marxist-Lenninism and Moaists as being a 'failed experiement' as it forces socialism by force of arms and tyranny, but proscribe to the approach of Marx where in Socialism must grow out of the failures of capitalism by the will of the people as a social change (similar to how capitalism grew out of the industrial revolution and the demise of agrarianism, which replaced feudalism).

Sweden also requires very strict laws on the economic stability of companies, that would be considered Marxist by any other standards, that are specifically devised towards ensuring a company security for the benefit of employees and the state, rather than the directors.

so for me, Sweden represents the way forwards, capitalism coupled to a social or socialist priority. I believe in the freedom of the individual (being more of an anarchist than a commie), and democracy that represents each and every single person. These I feel are vital to prevent tyranny of the majority (which communism, represents).

As for the UK passing laws for the benefit of society, that I disagree with, for most of my life I would say we pass laws based on maintaining the support of the parties voters, and primiarly the interests of corporations.


If you don't nationalise all means of production distribution and exchanges, then it is not Socialist.


That sounds more Soviet than Socialist.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View chris123's Profile chris123 Flag hove actually 05 Nov 15 2.53pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote Lyons550 at 05 Nov 2015 2.48pm

Quote chris123 at 05 Nov 2015 7.49am

Venezuela has the world's highest rate of inflation, at 100% and forecast to hit 150% by the end of the year. The exchange rate is shot, hyper inflation just around the corner - with such an abundance of natural resources, this is some feat.


Surely Zimbabwe's inflation rate is higher!?


[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 05 Nov 15 4.14pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

P

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 2.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 2.04pm

The most content, best run countries in the world are mostly borderline Socialist with a bit of healthy capitalism thrown in: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Canada, Holland, Norway. The usual suspects.

S'funny how that lot aren't repulsed by aspects of leftism and yet are pretty successful at 'society'. If only they would listen to the deep thinking, rational, anti-left ranters on here the could do it so much better. As good as the UK and USA even.

Edited by Kermit8 (05 Nov 2015 2.05pm)

Denmark - centre right 2015
Finland - centre right 2015
NZ - centre right 2014
Canada - centre 2015
Holland - centre left 2012
Norway - centre right 2013

So really heavily left then...

As for most content, they all have higher suicide rates than the UK.


Irrelevant unless they are embarking on some radical political change to move away from socialist influences within their societies.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 05 Nov 15 4.25pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 4.14pm

P

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 2.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 2.04pm

The most content, best run countries in the world are mostly borderline Socialist with a bit of healthy capitalism thrown in: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Canada, Holland, Norway. The usual suspects.

S'funny how that lot aren't repulsed by aspects of leftism and yet are pretty successful at 'society'. If only they would listen to the deep thinking, rational, anti-left ranters on here the could do it so much better. As good as the UK and USA even.

Edited by Kermit8 (05 Nov 2015 2.05pm)

Denmark - centre right 2015
Finland - centre right 2015
NZ - centre right 2014
Canada - centre 2015
Holland - centre left 2012
Norway - centre right 2013

So really heavily left then...

As for most content, they all have higher suicide rates than the UK.


Irrelevant unless they are embarking on some radical political change to move away from socialist influences within their societies.


As you can see the only one on the left, at all, was the one voted for the longest ago. The rest have shifted to the right, or reelected them.

And none of them are borderline socialist in the first place, you've just decided that they are to suit your argument.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 05 Nov 15 4.39pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 4.25pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 4.14pm

P

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 2.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 2.04pm

The most content, best run countries in the world are mostly borderline Socialist with a bit of healthy capitalism thrown in: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Canada, Holland, Norway. The usual suspects.

S'funny how that lot aren't repulsed by aspects of leftism and yet are pretty successful at 'society'. If only they would listen to the deep thinking, rational, anti-left ranters on here the could do it so much better. As good as the UK and USA even.

Edited by Kermit8 (05 Nov 2015 2.05pm)

Denmark - centre right 2015
Finland - centre right 2015
NZ - centre right 2014
Canada - centre 2015
Holland - centre left 2012
Norway - centre right 2013

So really heavily left then...

As for most content, they all have higher suicide rates than the UK.


Irrelevant unless they are embarking on some radical political change to move away from socialist influences within their societies.


As you can see the only one on the left, at all, was the one voted for the longest ago. The rest have shifted to the right, or reelected them.

And none of them are borderline socialist in the first place, you've just decided that they are to suit your argument.


So has this guy at Forbes [Link]

Nicking my "borderline" line the git. And that Madonna can fvck right off too.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 05 Nov 15 4.56pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 4.39pm

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 4.25pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 4.14pm

P

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 2.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 2.04pm

The most content, best run countries in the world are mostly borderline Socialist with a bit of healthy capitalism thrown in: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Canada, Holland, Norway. The usual suspects.

S'funny how that lot aren't repulsed by aspects of leftism and yet are pretty successful at 'society'. If only they would listen to the deep thinking, rational, anti-left ranters on here the could do it so much better. As good as the UK and USA even.

Edited by Kermit8 (05 Nov 2015 2.05pm)

Denmark - centre right 2015
Finland - centre right 2015
NZ - centre right 2014
Canada - centre 2015
Holland - centre left 2012
Norway - centre right 2013

So really heavily left then...

As for most content, they all have higher suicide rates than the UK.


Irrelevant unless they are embarking on some radical political change to move away from socialist influences within their societies.


As you can see the only one on the left, at all, was the one voted for the longest ago. The rest have shifted to the right, or reelected them.

And none of them are borderline socialist in the first place, you've just decided that they are to suit your argument.


So has this guy at Forbes [Link]

Nicking my "borderline" line the git. And that Madonna can fvck right off too.

A) So what if he has. Doesn't make either of you correct, and as an American he'd think the UK is a borderline socialist country.

B) That's nearly 5 years old and before all of those general elections.

C) The real answer for the happiest country is Costa Rica, I believe.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 05 Nov 15 5.03pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

And Costa Rica has a socialist party in power. How confusing is this?

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View chris123's Profile chris123 Flag hove actually 05 Nov 15 5.12pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 4.56pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 4.39pm

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 4.25pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 4.14pm

P

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 2.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 2.04pm

The most content, best run countries in the world are mostly borderline Socialist with a bit of healthy capitalism thrown in: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Canada, Holland, Norway. The usual suspects.

S'funny how that lot aren't repulsed by aspects of leftism and yet are pretty successful at 'society'. If only they would listen to the deep thinking, rational, anti-left ranters on here the could do it so much better. As good as the UK and USA even.

Edited by Kermit8 (05 Nov 2015 2.05pm)

Denmark - centre right 2015
Finland - centre right 2015
NZ - centre right 2014
Canada - centre 2015
Holland - centre left 2012
Norway - centre right 2013

So really heavily left then...

As for most content, they all have higher suicide rates than the UK.


Irrelevant unless they are embarking on some radical political change to move away from socialist influences within their societies.


As you can see the only one on the left, at all, was the one voted for the longest ago. The rest have shifted to the right, or reelected them.

And none of them are borderline socialist in the first place, you've just decided that they are to suit your argument.


So has this guy at Forbes [Link]

Nicking my "borderline" line the git. And that Madonna can fvck right off too.

A) So what if he has. Doesn't make either of you correct, and as an American he'd think the UK is a borderline socialist country.

B) That's nearly 5 years old and before all of those general elections.

C) The real answer for the happiest country is Costa Rica, I believe.


I'm sure Panama is far happier.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View matt_himself's Profile matt_himself Flag Hard Brexit 05 Nov 15 5.46pm Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 4.39pm

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 4.25pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 4.14pm

P

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 2.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 2.04pm

The most content, best run countries in the world are mostly borderline Socialist with a bit of healthy capitalism thrown in: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Canada, Holland, Norway. The usual suspects.

S'funny how that lot aren't repulsed by aspects of leftism and yet are pretty successful at 'society'. If only they would listen to the deep thinking, rational, anti-left ranters on here the could do it so much better. As good as the UK and USA even.

Edited by Kermit8 (05 Nov 2015 2.05pm)

Denmark - centre right 2015
Finland - centre right 2015
NZ - centre right 2014
Canada - centre 2015
Holland - centre left 2012
Norway - centre right 2013

So really heavily left then...

As for most content, they all have higher suicide rates than the UK.


Irrelevant unless they are embarking on some radical political change to move away from socialist influences within their societies.


As you can see the only one on the left, at all, was the one voted for the longest ago. The rest have shifted to the right, or reelected them.

And none of them are borderline socialist in the first place, you've just decided that they are to suit your argument.


So has this guy at Forbes [Link]

Nicking my "borderline" line the git. And that Madonna can fvck right off too.

Do you agree with the author when he implies that the 'happiest countries in the world' are those that are the least ethnically diverse?

I guess you'd know, living in a white only community and all...

 


"The real question is, at the end of the day, do we want to run our country? Are we proud of who we are? Are we happy to be just a star on somebody else's flag, or do we want to be an independent nation? - Nigel Farage

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 05 Nov 15 7.07pm Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote matt_himself at 05 Nov 2015 5.46pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 4.39pm

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 4.25pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 4.14pm

P

Quote Stuk at 05 Nov 2015 2.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 05 Nov 2015 2.04pm

The most content, best run countries in the world are mostly borderline Socialist with a bit of healthy capitalism thrown in: Denmark, Finland, New Zealand, Canada, Holland, Norway. The usual suspects.

S'funny how that lot aren't repulsed by aspects of leftism and yet are pretty successful at 'society'. If only they would listen to the deep thinking, rational, anti-left ranters on here the could do it so much better. As good as the UK and USA even.

Edited by Kermit8 (05 Nov 2015 2.05pm)

Denmark - centre right 2015
Finland - centre right 2015
NZ - centre right 2014
Canada - centre 2015
Holland - centre left 2012
Norway - centre right 2013

So really heavily left then...

As for most content, they all have higher suicide rates than the UK.


Irrelevant unless they are embarking on some radical political change to move away from socialist influences within their societies.


As you can see the only one on the left, at all, was the one voted for the longest ago. The rest have shifted to the right, or reelected them.

And none of them are borderline socialist in the first place, you've just decided that they are to suit your argument.


So has this guy at Forbes [Link]

Nicking my "borderline" line the git. And that Madonna can fvck right off too.

Do you agree with the author when he implies that the 'happiest countries in the world' are those that are the least ethnically diverse?

I guess you'd know, living in a white only community and all...


You do know that a "white only community" can have people from different ethnic backgrounds, right? Right?

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 4 of 14 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Venezuela - socialist paradise