Pulis appeal against CPFC award dismissed
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 We are goin up!  Coulsdon 29 Nov 16 3.56pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
In summary: Pulis is a c*nt who tried to use our club for his own personal financial gain, lied and misled a court, and is now getting his comeuppance. Hopefully in the form of bankruptcy. He should get absolute dog's abuse next time he comes to Selhurst, that's if he has a job by then. I wouldn't touch him with a barge pole if I was a chairman.
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Stuk Top half 29 Nov 16 4.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Getting a judgement is only ever half of the battle as getting settlement is the next and possibly much harder step Well he's on a basic salary of £2m plus bonuses. Has no dependants to use as an excuse and won't exactly have nothing in the bank already. I'd guess he'll pay up to make this go away ASAP now.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| merganser 29 Nov 16 4.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Anyone been checking the WBA fans' forum? I wonder if they're rallying behind their manager.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| The Dolphin 29 Nov 16 4.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
If he doesn't pay I fully expect CPFC to go after him and they will have his house etc.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Jamesey Wandsworth 29 Nov 16 4.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Getting a judgement is only ever half of the battle as getting settlement is the next and possibly much harder step Perhaps my legal knowledge is outdated now, but as far as I remember after a High Court of Appeal decision the only place to go was to the House of Lords and that was usually only for important points of law. So can we assume that that's the final decision. Any practising lawyers out there to confirm it or comment?
Nothing is fool-proof - fools are too ingenious |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Ginger Pubic Wig Wickham de L'Ouest 29 Nov 16 4.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I bet these shenanigans with Pulis colour the club's choice of a replacement for Pardew if that's the way they're going. Hard to imagine BFS coming in given the stuff that saw him lose the England job. Also suspect the yanks would be dead set against BFS for the same England indiscretion.
If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| PJH Colchester 29 Nov 16 4.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
That is unbef***ingleivable. Pulis is a lying, cheating scumbag and wow, did SP play a blinder or what ? Kept his powder dry and played his hand perfectly. How people like Pulis sleep at night is anyone's guess. He's happy to use his daughter (who's wedding SP went to so had an emotional tie in there) as an excuse for getting his bonus early and then fcuks off. I bet she's delighted to have such a deceitful father. I just hope West Brom fans give him the abuse he deserves and hopefully having to pay for all this will clear him out and he'll be declared bankrupt, and I hope SP hammers the final nail into that coffin. What a total cnut that bloke is.I, for one, tried to defend him when he left after he'd kept us up. Feel disgusted with myself for being taken in by this total tool.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 29 Nov 16 5.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jamesey
Perhaps my legal knowledge is outdated now, but as far as I remember after a High Court of Appeal decision the only place to go was to the House of Lords and that was usually only for important points of law. So can we assume that that's the final decision. Any practising lawyers out there to confirm it or comment? I don't suppose that Pulis would want to take it further and even if he did I would guess that his lawyers would be hesitant without a rather large up front payment towards their fees. It's all well and good making comments like "If he doesn't pay I fully expect CPFC to go after him and they will have his house etc." but do you think Steve Parish wants all the adverse publicity that such an action would generate and it isn't as easy to chuck someone out of their house anyway as even without young children half of it probably belongs to his wife. If Pulis has any sense any property that he has would be in his wife's name and he would be contracted to WBA via an overseas consultancy company so an attachment of earnings order would be out of the question. I have no idea whether Pulis has taken any precautions to protect his lifestyle but I certainly would have if it were me
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 29 Nov 16 5.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Ginger Pubic Wig
Also suspect the yanks would be dead set against BFS for the same England indiscretion. Are these the same yanks that are soon to be ruled over by the honourable Donald Trump
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 29 Nov 16 5.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I don't suppose that Pulis would want to take it further and even if he did I would guess that his lawyers would be hesitant without a rather large up front payment towards their fees. It's all well and good making comments like "If he doesn't pay I fully expect CPFC to go after him and they will have his house etc." but do you think Steve Parish wants all the adverse publicity that such an action would generate and it isn't as easy to chuck someone out of their house anyway as even without young children half of it probably belongs to his wife. If Pulis has any sense any property that he has would be in his wife's name and he would be contracted to WBA via an overseas consultancy company so an attachment of earnings order would be out of the question. I have no idea whether Pulis has taken any precautions to protect his lifestyle but I certainly would have if it were me Why would it create adverse publicity? The fans of the club he's currently at concur that he's come out of this looking like a moron. A very greedy and deceitful moron.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| kevlee born Wandsworth emigrated to Lanc... 29 Nov 16 10.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jamesey
Perhaps my legal knowledge is outdated now, but as far as I remember after a High Court of Appeal decision the only place to go was to the House of Lords and that was usually only for important points of law. So can we assume that that's the final decision. Any practising lawyers out there to confirm it or comment? You are correct that this is final and there is no further line of appeal available. The Supreme Court is only for points of law, not fact, like the fact he has been found to be a lying conman.
Following Palace since 25 Feb 1978 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Aray South London 29 Nov 16 10.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by legaleagle
Edited by legaleagle (29 Nov 2016 9.45am) I was told in April that he had plenty of chances to settle before it went to the court of arbitration but he just stone-walled Parish.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.