This week Gusset displays his ignorance of science.

You can do my Horoscope if it makes you feel better and then tell me how aliens are silly but speaking to the dead is really real "Cause my cousin went to a seance once and they knew all about uncle Nigel".

Or maybe how God spoke to you once through the TV and told you to save the world with socialism.

Hmmm. Well I can assure that the concept of race is unscientific and rather Victorian.
As for my personal views. I have never made a secret of the fact that I consider mass migration a big mistake for a number of reasons. None to do with physiology.

The 150,000 Poles settled here immediately after WW2; 120,000 Russians in the early 1900s; the 320,000 Germans since WW2; the 320,000 Chinese; the 40,000 Ugandan Asians in 1972 and that old chestnut, The Huguenots of whom 25% of Londoners today are related.

All 'mass migrations' that you must then consider to have been "a big mistake". Why?

Edited by Kermit8 (07 Jan 2017 11.45am)

I'd have thought that my last post suggested the exact opposite.

Although I think I can guess your brain size.

I'm just eluding to the fact that as a teacher you should be able to grasp simple concepts.

For example, that the term racism is little more than a colloquialism that has been adopted by the law, mainly for political and order purposes and by self interested groups along with a whole bunch of hand wringers such as yourself.

What this does is bury the reality of the friction between existing populations and migrants, between various religions groups and between people of varying socioeconomic levels or a mix of all of them.

So called "race" my dear boy is merely an easy identification for those who can't do complicated.

That's not really mass migration is it. That is 1,050,000 people in 70 years. That many have come here in the last 4 years.

What is your point?

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (07 Jan 2017 12.04pm)