You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Mourinho complains about Palace ref
May 7 2024 11.20am

Mourinho complains about Palace ref

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

 

View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Online Flag Croydon 03 Jan 17 12.18pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

ManU players are trained to be attention-seeking and talk constantly to referees as this feeds their ego none more than Mike Dean who loves his celebrity role.

Its hard luck on the paying public who won't be seeing much football but who cares about them.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View gambler's Profile gambler Flag Kent 03 Jan 17 12.21pm Send a Private Message to gambler Add gambler as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

ManU players are trained to be attention-seeking and talk constantly to referees as this feeds their ego none more than Mike Dean who loves his celebrity role.

Its hard luck on the paying public who won't be seeing much football but who cares about them.

I thought there was a new rule about players approaching the refs. Didn't stop them yesterday as usual. That rule obviously doesn't apply to them.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View taylors lovechild's Profile taylors lovechild Flag 03 Jan 17 12.23pm Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild Add taylors lovechild as a friend

Pundits go on about what Rooney's best position is, but clearly it's wherever the referee is.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View the silurian's Profile the silurian Flag The garden of England.(not really) 03 Jan 17 12.47pm Send a Private Message to the silurian Add the silurian as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

NO,NO,NO !

I have made my comments, I have nothing more to add so wil refrain from doing so.

I know you love a WILLO thread and all the WILLO baiting but alas I am going to disappoint you.

So you are the ONLY person who believes that the ref was correct.....Even Graham poll, most referees all the pundits, even plenty of man u fans agree IT WAS NOT A RED CARD but the normal Red bias came into effect..... Rojo V Palace same tackle..No card ! Forensic analysis helps no one, it's hagwash piffle balderdash to cover up referees errors which are becoming all too common now!!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HeathMan's Profile HeathMan Flag Purley 03 Jan 17 12.55pm Send a Private Message to HeathMan Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add HeathMan as a friend

I understand that referees have the option of letting play continue and then bringing the game back to a noted infringement (when giving advantage has not given a fair result). Will I ever see the "result" at such a pause of two Man u players receiving red cards, Rooney being given a yellow for trying to be the referee and Mourinho being sent to the stands?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rachid Rachid Rachid's Profile Rachid Rachid Rachid Flag 03 Jan 17 1.09pm Send a Private Message to Rachid Rachid Rachid Add Rachid Rachid Rachid as a friend

As the OP pointed out it was Phil Jones who tackled with both feet leading not the West Ham player.

Mourinho is a kn0b. Courted the Man Utd job and then complained about living in a hotel in Manchester. WTF.

Needs a slap basically.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 03 Jan 17 1.09pm

In the interests of fairness, yes the refereeing decisions made at the Palace Man Utd game were terrible, so much so, that both sides can feel extremely hard done by. He's right, there were any number of poor calls, that both sides can say changed the outcome of the game.

And, yes, those challenges should be red cards, even if referees have a tendency to see them as yellows. Rojo should have been sent off, and I think probably Feghouli should have gone as well - The problem is that the critics and pundits, will tend to call an issue a red one week, when its not given, and then call it harsh, the following week when it is given.

Its almost as if they're paid to talk about issues in the game, rather than the rules and regulations (which clearly many of them don't even remotely seem to understand).

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 03 Jan 17 1.31pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

In the interests of fairness, yes the refereeing decisions made at the Palace Man Utd game were terrible, so much so, that both sides can feel extremely hard done by. He's right, there were any number of poor calls, that both sides can say changed the outcome of the game.

And, yes, those challenges should be red cards, even if referees have a tendency to see them as yellows. Rojo should have been sent off, and I think probably Feghouli should have gone as well - The problem is that the critics and pundits, will tend to call an issue a red one week, when its not given, and then call it harsh, the following week when it is given.

Its almost as if they're paid to talk about issues in the game, rather than the rules and regulations (which clearly many of them don't even remotely seem to understand).

Jamie

My view entirely.

And these are the ones who complain about a lack of "Consistency" !

To be fair to Gary Neville he did say yesterday that it is very difficult to get "Consistency" when referees have different angles of view etc etc.I would add that no incidents are identical in terms of the angle/height/ferocity of challenges etc etc etc.

I await with baited breath as to whether W.Ham will appeal the Feghouli 'Red' and if so whether it will be overturned.Will they overturn a decision whereby the player has left the ground two-footed and lunged in ?


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View alaneagle1's Profile alaneagle1 Flag Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 03 Jan 17 1.49pm Send a Private Message to alaneagle1 Add alaneagle1 as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

Jamie

My view entirely.

And these are the ones who complain about a lack of "Consistency" !

To be fair to Gary Neville he did say yesterday that it is very difficult to get "Consistency" when referees have different angles of view etc etc.I would add that no incidents are identical in terms of the angle/height/ferocity of challenges etc etc etc.

I await with baited breath as to whether W.Ham will appeal the Feghouli 'Red' and if so whether it will be overturned.Will they overturn a decision whereby the player has left the ground two-footed and lunged in ?



They have appealed.

 


Palace 13th 2017/18.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cb1969's Profile cb1969 Flag Back in the 'hood 03 Jan 17 1.50pm Send a Private Message to cb1969 Add cb1969 as a friend

He does love a quotation mark does "Willo"

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 03 Jan 17 1.54pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by alaneagle1


They have appealed.

Yes just been informed about this but thank you all the same.

Interested in the outcome given that referees were advised that a player who leaves the ground in such circumstances is not in control of his actions.

Admittedly the tackle wasn't high but both feet were off the ground prior to the contact.I wait the outcome with baited breath.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View peterg's Profile peterg Flag Anerley 03 Jan 17 1.56pm Send a Private Message to peterg Add peterg as a friend

Originally posted by alaneagle1


They have appealed.

Let's hope they win, and then Willo will be left high and dry again.
Interesting that he defends the indefensible once again. I thought he only did that for C*ntenf*ck - not all refs. His description of the tackle was quite inaccurate and he did not mention the dying swan act by Jones that probably influenced Dean into giving a red card.
Let's say it again. Refs make mistakes, this was one, and - as all the tv pundits said too - it's near-impossible to see why Dean gave the red, even on the most generous interpretation.

 


The right place at the right time

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Mourinho complains about Palace ref