Shearer on MOTD

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Hoof Hearted 23 Jan 17 1.12pm
Originally posted by simonmdt From Shearer's twitter feed. Arsehole If I was a tweeter I think I would have replied something like.... "Ah yeah.. Move on... Just like you have over the £6Million you lost investing offshore LOL"
Alert a moderator to this post

Hoof Hearted 23 Jan 17 1.12pm

Originally posted by simonmdt

From Shearer's twitter feed. Arsehole

If I was a tweeter I think I would have replied something like....

"Ah yeah.. Move on... Just like you have over the £6Million you lost investing offshore LOL"

Alert a moderator to this post

Selhurstboys Basel 23 Jan 17 1.30pm
Originally posted by bicycle repair man I am not a straw clutcher,however. The fact that the ball went out for a throw in just before the City goal whilst the physio was ON the pitch treating Schlupp seems to have been whitewashed by the BBC.If someone other than a player is on the field of play the referee shouldn't just let play continue . What if Palace had broken away and were attacking the City goal I am sure he would have stopped play then. This! And I don't know the rules inside and out but surely Schlupp is allowed to get back on the pitch injured or not? If he stood up and ran 5 yards and then collapsed what's the difference? When the ball went out for the throw in it shpuld've been stopped imo.
Alert a moderator to this post

Selhurstboys

Basel 23 Jan 17 1.30pm

Originally posted by bicycle repair man

I am not a straw clutcher,however.
The fact that the ball went out for a throw in just before the City goal whilst the physio was ON the pitch treating Schlupp seems to have been whitewashed by the BBC.If someone other than a player is on the field of play the referee shouldn't just let play continue .
What if Palace had broken away and were attacking the City goal I am sure he would have stopped play then.

This!
And I don't know the rules inside and out but surely Schlupp is allowed to get back on the pitch injured or not? If he stood up and ran 5 yards and then collapsed what's the difference? When the ball went out for the throw in it shpuld've been stopped imo.

Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret 23 Jan 17 1.30pm
Originally posted by simonmdt From Shearer's twitter feed. Arsehole If you get within three minutes of a point against a team capable of thumping Manchester City and then only concede because your left-back is off the field getting treatment you are not "s*". Alan Shearer however is definitely a "s*" pundit and having seen that tweet I'm never watching any coverage that involves him again. He's entitled to his opinion I suppose but behaving like a boorish, graceless bumpkin on social media is out of order. Edited by chateauferret (23 Jan 2017 1.31pm) ============ The Ferret ============
Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret

23 Jan 17 1.30pm

Originally posted by simonmdt

From Shearer's twitter feed. Arsehole

If you get within three minutes of a point against a team capable of thumping Manchester City and then only concede because your left-back is off the field getting treatment you are not "s***".

Alan Shearer however is definitely a "s***" pundit and having seen that tweet I'm never watching any coverage that involves him again. He's entitled to his opinion I suppose but behaving like a boorish, graceless bumpkin on social media is out of order.

Edited by chateauferret (23 Jan 2017 1.31pm)

============
The Ferret
============

Alert a moderator to this post

kenners46 sydenham village 23 Jan 17 1.49pm
When is offside not offside as he clearly states Ward is playing Colman onside although the line drawn on the TV has Colmans leg in the offside position
Alert a moderator to this post

kenners46

sydenham village 23 Jan 17 1.49pm

When is offside not offside as he clearly states Ward is playing Colman onside although the line drawn on the TV has Colmans leg in the offside position

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 23 Jan 17 2.38pm
Originally posted by kenners46 When is offside not offside as he clearly states Ward is playing Colman onside although the line drawn on the TV has Colmans leg in the offside position They quickly glossed over this and gave little time for the viewers to assess. I agree he should not react like he has on a public forum and the BBC should act, perhaps a campaign should be started to get at least an apology. As a pundit he is, of course, entitled to his opinion but his twitter rant shows he cannot/will not be impartial as far as Palace is concerned.
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 23 Jan 17 2.38pm

Originally posted by kenners46

When is offside not offside as he clearly states Ward is playing Colman onside although the line drawn on the TV has Colmans leg in the offside position

They quickly glossed over this and gave little time for the viewers to assess. I agree he should not react like he has on a public forum and the BBC should act, perhaps a campaign should be started to get at least an apology.
As a pundit he is, of course, entitled to his opinion but his twitter rant shows he cannot/will not be impartial as far as Palace is concerned.

Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 23 Jan 17 2.40pm
Originally posted by Spiderman They quickly glossed over this and gave little time for the viewers to assess. I agree he should not react like he has on a public forum and the BBC should act, perhaps a campaign should be started to get at least an apology. As a pundit he is, of course, entitled to his opinion but his twitter rant shows he cannot/will not be impartial as far as Palace is concerned. You could, of course, choose to ignore him. Works for me. Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 23 Jan 17 2.40pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

You could, of course, choose to ignore him.

Works for me.

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 23 Jan 17 3.08pm
Originally posted by Cucking Funt You could, of course, choose to ignore him. Works for me. You are, of course, correct (again!) but it grates that he is so overpaid for his punditry (is that a word?) and does not seem to show such bias against any other club.
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 23 Jan 17 3.08pm

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

You could, of course, choose to ignore him.

Works for me.

You are, of course, correct (again!) but it grates that he is so overpaid for his punditry (is that a word?) and does not seem to show such bias against any other club.

Alert a moderator to this post

OhthisbloodyPC 23 Jan 17 3.09pm
For me, Shearer is too predictable He doesn't think outside the box He doesn't work hard enough to come up with original angles He's like a wax work dummy with a pre-recorded set of limited verdicts. I'm sure he could be replaced by a robot - Artificial Shearer - although people might complain that the new version is much more animated. Originally posted by Spiderman They quickly glossed over this and gave little time for the viewers to assess. I agree he should not react like he has on a public forum and the BBC should act, perhaps a campaign should be started to get at least an apology. As a pundit he is, of course, entitled to his opinion but his twitter rant shows he cannot/will not be impartial as far as Palace is concerned.
Alert a moderator to this post

OhthisbloodyPC

23 Jan 17 3.09pm

For me, Shearer is too predictable

He doesn't think outside the box

He doesn't work hard enough to come up with original angles

He's like a wax work dummy with a pre-recorded set of limited verdicts.

I'm sure he could be replaced by a robot - Artificial Shearer - although people might complain that the new version is much more animated.

Originally posted by Spiderman

Alert a moderator to this post

paperhat croydon 23 Jan 17 3.51pm
Originally posted by Spiderman They quickly glossed over this and gave little time for the viewers to assess. I agree he should not react like he has on a public forum and the BBC should act, perhaps a campaign should be started to get at least an apology. As a pundit he is, of course, entitled to his opinion but his twitter rant shows he cannot/will not be impartial as far as Palace is concerned. really? are you that offended by him? wow, Stripey Nigel really does fit in this case Clinton is Clinton. I have known him for a long time, I know his mother... Simon Jordan
Alert a moderator to this post

paperhat

croydon 23 Jan 17 3.51pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

They quickly glossed over this and gave little time for the viewers to assess. I agree he should not react like he has on a public forum and the BBC should act, perhaps a campaign should be started to get at least an apology.
As a pundit he is, of course, entitled to his opinion but his twitter rant shows he cannot/will not be impartial as far as Palace is concerned.

really? are you that offended by him?

wow, Stripey Nigel really does fit in this case

Clinton is Clinton. I have known him for a long time, I know his mother... Simon Jordan

Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret 24 Jan 17 1.33pm
It's a laugh the BBC going on about whether Citeh should have had a penalty against Spurs the other day. [Link] When it's Wilf or Benteke their silence is deafening. ============ The Ferret ============
Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret

24 Jan 17 1.33pm

It's a laugh the BBC going on about whether Citeh should have had a penalty against Spurs the other day.

[Link]

When it's Wilf or Benteke their silence is deafening.

============
The Ferret
============

Alert a moderator to this post

Eagle123456 24 Jan 17 1.41pm
Originally posted by chateauferret It's a laugh the BBC going on about whether Citeh should have had a penalty against Spurs the other day. [Link] When it's Wilf or Benteke their silence is deafening. If it was Wilf they would be crucifying him all day long, even if it's a stonewall penalty. Perhaps Shearer has sour grapes over some comments exchanged between him and Parish on social media (about Zaha funnily enough) so he could be letting this cloud his actual judgement and calling what he wants to see (and has gotten the MOTD panel on board with this). Anyway, i wouldn't listen to any of those clowns at the BBC, if they spoke and had as much sense as they thought they had, they would be full time managers. Look what happened to Shearer when he stepped up to the plate.
Alert a moderator to this post

Eagle123456

24 Jan 17 1.41pm

Originally posted by chateauferret

It's a laugh the BBC going on about whether Citeh should have had a penalty against Spurs the other day.

[Link]

When it's Wilf or Benteke their silence is deafening.

If it was Wilf they would be crucifying him all day long, even if it's a stonewall penalty.

Perhaps Shearer has sour grapes over some comments exchanged between him and Parish on social media (about Zaha funnily enough) so he could be letting this cloud his actual judgement and calling what he wants to see (and has gotten the MOTD panel on board with this).

Anyway, i wouldn't listen to any of those clowns at the BBC, if they spoke and had as much sense as they thought they had, they would be full time managers. Look what happened to Shearer when he stepped up to the plate.

Alert a moderator to this post

Woolsy Essex 24 Jan 17 2.00pm
I haven't watched MoD since 3rd December,when we beat Southampton 3-0! Its too painful.
Alert a moderator to this post

Woolsy

Essex 24 Jan 17 2.00pm

I haven't watched MoD since 3rd December,when we beat Southampton 3-0! Its too painful.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 4 of 6 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Shearer on MOTD

Site Map

Sponsors