Jack Wilshire (Suggestion)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Booted Eagle  Bristol 29 Dec 17 3.46pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Uphill
If we could get him for 10 million plus Benteke We are desperate for a midfield general. Cabaye is ok but now lasts only 70 minutes and does not have the calmness, vision (or ability) of Jack. With Wilshere playing we would not need Benteke and could buy back Gayle who thrives on through balls to feet. Why would the Arse ever want Tekkers ? They will get not much spare of £90 million for Sanchez if he leaves. They won't let go of Wilshere in anycase, not on current form. I doubt whether Napoleon will save us from defeat against Citeh.
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Lyons550 Shirley 29 Dec 17 3.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by bashy2
Wouldn't go near JW with a barge pole his too injury prone and would spend more time on the fitness table than Connor Wickham and that's saying something That old chesnut...it really does amaze me how people only look backwards rather than seeing what's in front of their eyes. I appreciate he's had a number of injuries but he's now seemingly coming through that...if he wasn't a player we'd touch with a 'barge pole' why would a team like Arsenal want to keep him?
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Welsh Eagle  29 Dec 17 6.17pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Pointless thread,the Arse will be extending his contract in the near future & even if he was made available I wouldn't want him here because he is injury prone!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| mattteo 29 Dec 17 6.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Wilshire looks good at Arsenal, playing alongside all the other good players.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Welsh Eagle 29 Dec 17 6.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Lyons550
That old chesnut...it really does amaze me how people only look backwards rather than seeing what's in front of their eyes. I appreciate he's had a number of injuries but he's now seemingly coming through that...if he wasn't a player we'd touch with a 'barge pole' why would a team like Arsenal want to keep him? I think it is very relevant that he is injury prone & its only a matter of time before he gets injured again! The Arse can afford his wages more than us if he is going to be constantly out injured going by his historical injury record. After Wickham & Remy we don't need another player like this on the payroll!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| alaneagle1 Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 29 Dec 17 6.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Booted Eagle
Why would the Arse ever want Tekkers ? They will get not much spare of £90 million for Sanchez if he leaves. They won't let go of Wilshere in anycase, not on current form. I doubt whether Napoleon will save us from defeat against Citeh. I doubt Sanchez will move in January for £90 Million.
Palace 13th 2017/18. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.