Bias against Trump
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
Park Road  08 Jun 19 12.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Oh I read and "understood" your reply perfectly well. What is obvious is that when called out for making indefensible statements you resort to attacking your critic rather than responding to the criticism. Which is a very Trumpian tactic. Hitler went further of course. He murdered them. I will post replies as I see fit, and should I choose to, and not at the behest of anyone else. You have no obligation to either read or respond. That is your choice.
And trumpian is how you behave e.g. arrogance, deflecting insults you've written like wierd people live in wisbech, thinking people read your posts and think your right, your constant reference to people who agree with you, Cornish farmers et Al, American trump fans.etc. but most of all your denial when pulled on something idiotic you have written. I'm starting to think you are Trump. Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 12.56pm) Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 12.58pm)
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 Teddy Eagle  08 Jun 19 12.58pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I have no idea. It wasn't me to brought it up! Fine. So it’s nothing to do with you not wanting to accept any criticism of those whose political bias you endorse. Excellent. Glad to hear it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
Wisbech Eagle  Truro Cornwall 08 Jun 19 1.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Because you don't read replies properly and hence post dim statements I've already agreed with as if I hadn't. Someone who doesn't read replies yet comments back to them deserves criticism and not a little frustration. Just because you think I don't read your replies properly, so regard them as "dim" doesn't mean I don't, or that they are! It means I disagree with them. If you had "already agreed" with anything it was so wrapped up in attempts at further justifications of your original claims as it be invisible. If you want to argue further I suggest you direct your criticisms to the Encyclopedia Britannica whose web site it came from, for it was their statements you were questioning and not mine. Well, that is your choice and if you refuse to stop posting at me I guess I have no choice to occasionally respond. However when individuals get a block facility you won't get that option and you can carry on being Wisbech with those that wish to engage you. I am not "posting at you". I am responding to comments I believe are erroneous and therefore misleading.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jun 19 1.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Park Road
And trumpian is how you behave e.g. arrogance, deflecting insults you've written like wierd people live in wisbech, thinking people read your posts and think your right, your constant reference to people who agree with you, Cornish farmers et Al, American trump fans.etc. but most of all your denial when pulled on something idiotic you have written. I'm starting to think you are Trump. Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 12.56pm) Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 12.58pm) I won't bother in telling you what I have discerned about your character. I think that most others, even those who share your political viewpoint, will have worked that out for themselves.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH Online SW2 08 Jun 19 1.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
You have to hand it to him, he really is astoundingly thick [Tweet Link]
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jun 19 1.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Fine. So it’s nothing to do with you not wanting to accept any criticism of those whose political bias you endorse. Excellent. Glad to hear it. I don't endorse anyone who is a dictator, murderer or despot. What a silly idea! Yet another attempt at diversion.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 08 Jun 19 2.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don't endorse anyone who is a dictator, murderer or despot. What a silly idea! Yet another attempt at diversion. Diversion from what exactly? This thread has been pretty wide ranging but apparently has to conform to your boundaries. OK, how about you decide at the start of each thread which subjects are off limits just so everyone knows. Or better yet, you post Your wisdom and add a like button so everyone can agree with you and sit back in amazement at your grasp of geopolitical events.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 08 Jun 19 2.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
You give the man a title of thick but cannot see how he operates.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Park Road 08 Jun 19 2.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I won't bother in telling you what I have discerned about your character. I think that most others, even those who share your political viewpoint, will have worked that out for themselves. Then don't simple... There you go again! You now know my political viewpoint...just like you knew my hero... when I pulled you up on it...you said you were obviously speculating...eventhough, I think, they are called modal verbs of speculation, were never used...were they Wisbech... Trump, also thinks his supporters would have worked out things for themselves, another diversion tactic.. You are so full yourself, you can't see how you and Trump share the same characteristics.
Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 2.35pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jun 19 6.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Diversion from what exactly? This thread has been pretty wide ranging but apparently has to conform to your boundaries. OK, how about you decide at the start of each thread which subjects are off limits just so everyone knows. Or better yet, you post Your wisdom and add a like button so everyone can agree with you and sit back in amazement at your grasp of geopolitical events. It was a diversion from the very specific point being discussed and totally irrelevant in that context. If you want to make points about other things that's your prerogative but linking them to another issue is to divert.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Jun 19 6.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Park Road
Then don't simple... There you go again! You now know my political viewpoint...just like you knew my hero... when I pulled you up on it...you said you were obviously speculating...eventhough, I think, they are called modal verbs of speculation, were never used...were they Wisbech... Trump, also thinks his supporters would have worked out things for themselves, another diversion tactic.. You are so full yourself, you can't see how you and Trump share the same characteristics.
Edited by Park Road (08 Jun 2019 2.35pm) Strangely I don't pay much attention to incoherent ramblings so cannot recall any precise details other than the wrong ends of several sticks being gleefully grasped in an effort to discredit. However I somehow doubt whether you could pull up a daisy so you most certainly have never pulled up me! I cannot think of one characteristic that I share with Trump. I will mention that idea down the pub later. They always like a good laugh in there.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 08 Jun 19 6.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It was a diversion from the very specific point being discussed and totally irrelevant in that context. If you want to make points about other things that's your prerogative but linking them to another issue is to divert. And explaining what diversions are isn’t a diversion.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.