Explosion at parsons Green underground station
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
jamiemartin721  Reading 18 Sep 17 5.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Not exactly slammed shut either. Security has to come first. Are you saying the individual security from threat trumps anything. There is no threat to national security from terrorism; only to individuals. Should we accept the same response to all threats to the lives of British Citizens?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Sep 17 5.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by elgrande
Which as a taxpayer, am paying for. I think we'd have to establish that they weren't radicalised within the UK, before accepting that as a conclusion, rather than an assumption.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 elgrande bedford 18 Sep 17 5.27pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I think we'd have to establish that they weren't radicalised within the UK, before accepting that as a conclusion, rather than an assumption. Well find out how long they have been leeching here,then we will know
always a Norwood boy, where ever I live. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| hedgehog50 Croydon 18 Sep 17 5.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
How are people with signs a threat to national security - aren't they just using freedom of speech and expression? I'm not sure how the SWP come into it. They're just a tiny group, like the EDL or Britain First, who see themselves as self appointed 'moral enforcers', who ultimately, tend to use the questions around asylum to extend their own political agenda - They're not interested in refugees or issues around asylum - they're only interested in it as a means of expanding their membership and political influence. Encouraging and allowing thousands of refugees to enter the country (particularly Islamic refugees of course) endangers national security.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 18 Sep 17 5.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Encouraging and allowing thousands of refugees to enter the country (particularly Islamic refugees of course) endangers national security. From the million or so British babies due to born here over the next two years there will be, amongst them, when older, psychopaths, rapists, murderers and vicious thugs endangering all our security. Let's ban babies because some of them are going to commit heinous crimes as adults? Authorities should be doing a psycho test on every single refugee/migrant to help prevent and educate and de-radicalise the dodgy ones carrying on their warped path especially the young ones.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Sep 17 5.47pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Encouraging and allowing thousands of refugees to enter the country (particularly Islamic refugees of course) endangers national security. Are they encouraging thousands of refugees to enter the UK though, I'd be surprised if many refugees are scouring the small articles of UK news and thinking. Also, no it doesn't, not really. The number of refugees in the UK that are given asylum each year is a very small figure, around 29,000 on a heavy year. Also, the number of terrorists that have been refugees is pretty low (once you remove people that the UK knew were involved in terrorism, and granted them Asylum for geo-political reasons). Much lower than those who are British born citizens. That's not to say there isn't a risk. There will always be a risk, anyone coming to the UK or in the UK, could be a threat to someone's life. For the most part, I think that people generally regard Asylum as being immigration - it isn't and it should be viewed separately.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 18 Sep 17 5.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Are you saying the individual security from threat trumps anything. There is no threat to national security from terrorism; only to individuals. Should we accept the same response to all threats to the lives of British Citizens? Are you saying that we should treat the risk of allowing terrorists into Britain the same way as people being run over or falling down the stairs?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 18 Sep 17 5.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Spin Doctors Jamie and Kermit can spin all they like. The fact remains that a refugee has tried to carry out an act of terrorism - as predicted by many, while the left was dismissing such concerns. Now of course they start throwing out their squid-ink to obscure what is in front of our noses.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Sep 17 5.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
From the million or so British babies due to born here over the next two years there will be, amongst them, when older, psychopaths, rapists, murderers and vicious thugs endangering all our security. Let's ban babies because some of them are going to commit heinous crimes as adults? Authorities should be doing a psycho test on every single refugee/migrant to help prevent and educate and de-radicalise the dodgy ones carrying on their warped path especially the young ones. I think there is reason to be more cautious when accepting refugees from certain countries. But the problem is that we're waiting for people to make it to the UK, rather than from the people arriving at the refugee camps - where you have a reasonable chance of making an accurate analysis of who they are, where they came from. Instead we're left dealing with people who have spent time in refugee camps, and may have been there for a year or more. If we focused on taking people from the camps and processing them on arrival accordingly, we'd have the choice and a reasonable knowledge of where they have come from (and can use other people on site to verify that). Its a poor strategy to wait until people make it to the UK, by which point its almost impossible to know where they have come from (which makes returning them a nightmare).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Sep 17 5.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Spin Doctors Jamie and Kermit can spin all they like. The fact remains that a refugee has tried to carry out an act of terrorism - as predicted by many, while the left was dismissing such concerns. Now of course they start throwing out their squid-ink to obscure what is in front of our noses. I think its probably true that they did, seems that way. Well done, you predicted it. The left weren't dismissing those concerns, they were dismissing your view that it justified ending any asylum.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Sep 17 6.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Are you saying that we should treat the risk of allowing terrorists into Britain the same way as people being run over or falling down the stairs? No, those are accidents. I think we should treat them proportionally to the deliberate acts of others that criminally affect peoples lives. I don't believe that we should treat whole groups of people as being guilty, on the basis of actions of individuals. We should deal with the risk as best we can. Sadly, we didn't, we decided not take a proactive approach to dealing with refugees, i.e. selecting people from the camps when they arrive there, and you can work out who they are, where they're from and verify that.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Kermit8 Hevon 18 Sep 17 6.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Spin Doctors Jamie and Kermit can spin all they like. The fact remains that a refugee has tried to carry out an act of terrorism - as predicted by many, while the left was dismissing such concerns. Now of course they start throwing out their squid-ink to obscure what is in front of our noses. Nearly every single act of terrorism in the UK over the last 50 years has been committed by those born in the UK. A massive overreaction on your part to ban all refugees because of a dangerous few.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.