Football Lads Alliance
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
nickgusset  Shizzlehurst 11 Oct 17 11.07am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
It's actually you who talk about that. You are starting to bore me with your transparent nonsense and you are still getting away with insults. I'm begining to think that there is some bias. Erm, you started the thread about too many non English people on the news.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 Hrolf The Ganger 11 Oct 17 11.28am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Erm, you started the thread about too many non English people on the news.
As if it is any surprise that the media is a propaganda machine. As are you.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 11 Oct 17 11.30am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
As if it is any surprise that the media is a propaganda machine. As are you. Oh dear. That old chestnut again. Are the FLA planning any more marches?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 11 Oct 17 11.35am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Oh dear. That old chestnut again. Are the FLA planning any more marches? Old chestnut? The only nut here is you. I have no idea about marches. They are your thing comrade. Behind the red flag of course.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 11 Oct 17 11.37am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Old chestnut? The only nut here is you. I have no idea about marches. They are your thing comrade. Behind the red flag of course. Oh dear. The question wasn't aimed exclusively at you.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 11 Oct 17 11.40am |
|
|---|---|
|
You are boring me. Bye.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 11 Oct 17 11.45am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You are boring me. Bye. Good, the grown ups can talk now.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Brentmiester_General Front line in the battle against t... 11 Oct 17 3.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
How is marching against terror a bad thing? Oh I forgot, any march that doesn't involve a left wing group = nazis! Ridiculous. How is it a good thing?
"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 11 Oct 17 3.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
The way the FLA would win me over more is if they make more of all forms of terrorism. I'd get them to tell Toxic Tommy Robinson to stay well away. Not good for PR. I'd also ask them not to sing 'you let our country down' at anti islamophobia demonstrators, as believe it or not, they are just as sickened by terrorism as the rest of us. Do they read the HOL?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Bert the Head Epsom 11 Oct 17 10.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Park Road
It's very simple so take note. There many articles for and against TWAS It would be interesting to know what the FLA definition of terrorism is. The definition from the a US army manual is quite good "terror is the calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to attain political or religious ideological goals through intimidation, coercion, or instilling fear." If you apply that to recent history you can see who the terrorists really are. With regard to your point about a "fear to offend Islamist terrorists." It wasn't long ago that the British and US states were not keen to offend Islamist terrorists either. In fact we loved them and their Jihad so much that we armed them and trained them to help carry it on. Then when they'd stopped fighting the Russians in Afghanistan we helped them get to Bosnia to fight there. If the FLA were really against terrorism I'd happily join them. But they are generally a bunch of ill-informed people who have no idea of the history behind Islamic Terrorism. This gives them a misplaced view of the west as victims: An idea that doesn't stand up to the simple scrutiny of casualty figures.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 11 Oct 17 11.00pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Bert the Head
It would be interesting to know what the FLA definition of terrorism is. The definition from the a US army manual is quite good "terror is the calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to attain political or religious ideological goals through intimidation, coercion, or instilling fear." If you apply that to recent history you can see who the terrorists really are. With regard to your point about a "fear to offend Islamist terrorists." It wasn't long ago that the British and US states were not keen to offend Islamist terrorists either. In fact we loved them and their Jihad so much that we armed them and trained them to help carry it on. Then when they'd stopped fighting the Russians in Afghanistan we helped them get to Bosnia to fight there. If the FLA were really against terrorism I'd happily join them. But they are generally a bunch of ill-informed people who have no idea of the history behind Islamic Terrorism. This gives them a misplaced view of the west as victims: An idea that doesn't stand up to the simple scrutiny of casualty figures.
We know about that mate, but this is about our families being in danger on a day out in London, not convenient shared regional political goals which mean s0d all if you've lost your wife or kids. I quite frankly don't give a shoit which extreme Muslims are offended. It's a belief system that needs reform and has no place in our society to think it can force its anachronistic shyte on us. That kind of religious bullsh1t fervour has no place or right to be here and never should do. Who the fvck do they think they are? I'd be ashamed myself if I sided with these cvnts hassling people daily on the Edgware Road after withdrawing their benefits to do so.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Penge Eagle Beckenham 11 Oct 17 11.17pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Bert the Head
Who is "we"? Not me for certain. I don't agree with much of the British political elite who make those decisions. Quote
It would be interesting to know what the FLA definition of terrorism is. The definition from the a US army manual is quite good "terror is the calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to attain political or religious ideological goals through intimidation, coercion, or instilling fear." If you apply that to recent history you can see who the terrorists really are. If the FLA were really against terrorism I'd happily join them. But they are generally a bunch of ill-informed people who have no idea of the history behind Islamic Terrorism. This gives them a misplaced view of the west as victims: An idea that doesn't stand up to the simple scrutiny of casualty figures. It's quite clear they are against the Islamic terrorism that has occurred in the UK this year alone. How are they ill-informed? Because they are football fans? They are everyday people who don't care about geopolitics, they care about innocent people being blown up in their country.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.