You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Grooming Gangs + Tommy Robinson Thread
January 23 2022 8.54am

Grooming Gangs + Tommy Robinson Thread

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 362 of 404 < 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 >

 

View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 22 Oct 21 6.35pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Even if no one else is willing or able to do it?

But they are. That's why it's against the law.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 22 Oct 21 6.47pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by dannyboy1978

Ok forget Yaxley lennon for now. Were you aware that Muslims find it ok in their faith to have sex with 10- 11 12 year olds?

I personally think its upsetting their are potentially 100's of thousand of Muslims who think its OK because their faith says so.
What do you think wissy and Dan d

Where do you get those figures from?

No survey I have ever seen supports such an assertion, so I strongly doubt that to be true. I think it is just more evidence of prejudice, and that most modern British Muslims would be as appalled at any kind of paedophilia as the rest of us.

That there are paedos out there is obviously true, but we need to concentrate on their crimes and not tarnish the whole community they might be part of. We need to encourage the law-abiding to turn them in. You don't do that when you ostracise them through guilt by association.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View georgenorman's Profile georgenorman Flag 22 Oct 21 6.52pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Where do you get those figures from?

No survey I have ever seen supports such an assertion, so I strongly doubt that to be true. I think it is just more evidence of prejudice, and that most modern British Muslims would be as appalled at any kind of paedophilia as the rest of us.

That there are paedos out there is obviously true, but we need to concentrate on their crimes and not tarnish the whole community they might be part of. We need to encourage the law-abiding to turn them in. You don't do that when you ostracise them through guilt by association.

The minimum age in Shari'ah is the onset of puberty, so in most cases well below a civilised age of consent.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 22 Oct 21 7.20pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

The minimum age in Shari'ah is the onset of puberty, so in most cases well below a civilised age of consent.

Complete red herring.

We don't live under Sharia law. British law applies to everyone in the UK, whatever their faith.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag Chatham 22 Oct 21 7.48pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Complete red herring.

We don't live under Sharia law. British law applies to everyone in the UK, whatever their faith.

But it's OK in other countries to shag a 10 year old.
It's the true belief of millions of qoran readers worldwide.
Do your own research. As for muslims being appalled and turning in offenders; is this not why TR highlighted the grooming gangs purely because 1000s of family members wouldn't turn them in.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View georgenorman's Profile georgenorman Flag 22 Oct 21 7.54pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Complete red herring.

We don't live under Sharia law. British law applies to everyone in the UK, whatever their faith.

Not a red herring at all. The law should apply to everyone, but religious people often put their religion's teachings before the law and/or accepted societal practice. Quakers refused to be conscripted in World War II, Jehovah's Witnesses refuse blood transfusions, Sikhs can carry knives and don't have to wear crash helmets, etc. Some muslims have bombed children at pop music concerts in the name of their religion, paedophilia would seem moderate to those killers.

Edited by georgenorman (22 Oct 2021 8.11pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 22 Oct 21 8.48pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

But it's OK in other countries to shag a 10 year old.
It's the true belief of millions of qoran readers worldwide.
Do your own research. As for muslims being appalled and turning in offenders; is this not why TR highlighted the grooming gangs purely because 1000s of family members wouldn't turn them in.

In some yes, but whilst we can disapprove in whatever way we can, we have no authority there. Where we do, it is against the law. For everyone.

Laxley-Lennon adds to the problem. He doesn't solve it in any way at all. His rhetoric, delivered in his smarmy style, accompanied by the occasional punch and time in jail, tends to increase, and not heal, the gaps that exist between communities. Many of whom are doing some great work together, often unpublicised. Breaking down the traditional family loyalties is a work in progress. Work being hindered by Y-L. We need to succeed, which is why so many are so angry with Y-L, who must know he is harming people but just doesn't care. He has his own agenda. Follow the money!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag Chatham 22 Oct 21 8.53pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

In some yes, but whilst we can disapprove in whatever way we can, we have no authority there. Where we do, it is against the law. For everyone.

Laxley-Lennon adds to the problem. He doesn't solve it in any way at all. His rhetoric, delivered in his smarmy style, accompanied by the occasional punch and time in jail, tends to increase, and not heal, the gaps that exist between communities. Many of whom are doing some great work together, often unpublicised. Breaking down the traditional family loyalties is a work in progress. Work being hindered by Y-L. We need to succeed, which is why so many are so angry with Y-L, who must know he is harming people but just doesn't care. He has his own agenda. Follow the money!

Your first three words are disgusting. You sanctiin sex with 10 year olds. I've read some upsetting things on here but I think you have won that prize.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 22 Oct 21 8.56pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by georgenorman

Not a red herring at all. The law should apply to everyone, but religious people often put their religion's teachings before the law and/or accepted societal practice. Quakers refused to be conscripted in World War II, Jehovah's Witnesses refuse blood transfusions, Sikhs can carry knives and don't have to wear crash helmets, etc. Some muslims have bombed children at pop music concerts in the name of their religion, paedophilia would seem moderate to those killers.

Edited by georgenorman (22 Oct 2021 8.11pm)

The law DOES apply to everyone. In our tolerant society, religious sensitivities are respected wherever possible. Conscientious objection and refusing blood transfusions are not against the law. Sikhs were given dispensations.

These are totally different to killing people or committing paedophilia. Both are heinous crimes which could not, and will not, ever be tolerated, whatever a person's motivation.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 22 Oct 21 9.04pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Your first three words are disgusting. You sanctiin sex with 10 year olds. I've read some upsetting things on here but I think you have won that prize.

You deliberately misunderstand me. I am not "sanctioning" anything. That it's lawful in some countries doesn't mean I approve. As you know very well. If you don't, you do now!

The point I made is that we have no jurisdiction there, whilst we do here. Here, it is very clearly against the law.

As you have no more influence over what happens in other countries than I do, does this mean that YOU sanction acts there that are unlawful here?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View georgenorman's Profile georgenorman Flag 22 Oct 21 9.04pm Send a Private Message to georgenorman Add georgenorman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

The law DOES apply to everyone. In our tolerant society, religious sensitivities are respected wherever possible. Conscientious objection and refusing blood transfusions are not against the law. Sikhs were given dispensations.

These are totally different to killing people or committing paedophilia. Both are heinous crimes which could not, and will not, ever be tolerated, whatever a person's motivation.

Clearly the law does NOT apply to everyone as there is one law for Sikhs and another for everyone else.
As for blood transfusions, I said 'law and/or societal practice'. What I and other posters are saying is that from their religious perspective, the muslims religion sanctions sex with children who have reached puberty.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 22 Oct 21 9.15pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

But they are. That's why it's against the law.

But they didnít. Which is why he did.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 362 of 404 < 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Grooming Gangs + Tommy Robinson Thread