Jordan Hugill (paper Talk)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 dp  Tunbridge Wells 04 Apr 18 7.11am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
And if I did I would be accused or being a "Name dropper".
That riposte took two months to compose Willo? Hardly seemed worth it.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 04 Apr 18 8.07am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dp
That riposte took two months to compose Willo? Hardly seemed worth it. I only perused the post yesterday besides my message is not diluted by the passing of time.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dp Tunbridge Wells 06 Apr 18 8.41am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I only perused the post yesterday besides my message is not diluted by the passing of time.
OK. I am glad that you managed to get it off of your chest then. Well done for making sure that the subject matter of the post remains well and truly focussed on you. It would have been terrible if people had actually started talking about Jordan Hugill.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 06 Apr 18 8.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dp
OK. I am glad that you managed to get it off of your chest then. Well done for making sure that the subject matter of the post remains well and truly focussed on you. It would have been terrible if people had actually started talking about Jordan Hugill. The thread was focussed on me by the following comment "At least he has now "stumped up" his source unlike you Willo, perhaps on occasions you should "stump up" or shut up". I was only responding to it. Besides in this thread I have already posted by views on Hugill so I cannot be accused of ignoring the subject matter and turning this into a Willo thread.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dp Tunbridge Wells 06 Apr 18 10.07am |
|
|---|---|
|
Yes, but that was two months ago!!! The subject matter that I posted was an article relating to how Hugill was doing at West Ham. However you then ignored that "Hugill" post and replied to an old "Willo" post that was two months old to unceremoniously drag the subject back onto you. I do not want to get dragged into a Willo conversation with you. If you want the last word, then please go ahead and have it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 06 Apr 18 10.31am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dp
Yes, but that was two months ago!!! The subject matter that I posted was an article relating to how Hugill was doing at West Ham. However you then ignored that "Hugill" post and replied to an old "Willo" post that was two months old to unceremoniously drag the subject back onto you. I do not want to get dragged into a Willo conversation with you. If you want the last word, then please go ahead and have it. If you had cared to read one of my posts you would have seen that I mentioned that I only perused the "2 months old" post the day before I posted a riposte.Never even realised it was an old post.I certainly did not drag up an old post just to focus attention on "Yours truly".The notion that I had a real yearning to turn the spotlight on myself, looked back to see any opportunity and thought "Hey Presto" this post will do, is total and utter hogwash. You have made your allegations I have provided a response.Perhaps the debate can now focus on the subject matter. Edited by Willo (06 Apr 2018 10.38am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dp Tunbridge Wells 06 Apr 18 4.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
If you had cared to read one of my posts you would have seen that I mentioned that I only perused the "2 months old" post the day before I posted a riposte.Never even realised it was an old post.I certainly did not drag up an old post just to focus attention on "Yours truly".The notion that I had a real yearning to turn the spotlight on myself, looked back to see any opportunity and thought "Hey Presto" this post will do, is total and utter hogwash. You have made your allegations I have provided a response.Perhaps the debate can now focus on the subject matter. Edited by Willo (06 Apr 2018 10.38am) I did read your post. The effective date of a post is the date when it was written, not when you got round to reading it. Most people would have read the post, realised that it was two months old and then got on with their lives, although I accept that you are not most people. A good way to make sure the debate remains focussed on the subject matter is for you not to hijack it in the first place. Anyway, looks like we dodged a bullet with Hugill.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.