Time traveller from 2030
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Forest Hillbilly  in a hidey-hole 17 Feb 18 5.49pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
I am a time traveller, but I only go forwards. The best evidence for time travel not existing, is that no-one from the future has arrived with tangible evidence to the contrary.
"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 17 Feb 18 5.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I am from the past. (17.49) Things are 5hlt in Palace Talk (I predicted that ). I reckon they'll be the same until after at least the weekend
"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Hrolf The Ganger  17 Feb 18 6.55pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
I am a time traveller, but I only go forwards. The best evidence for time travel not existing, is that no-one from the future has arrived with tangible evidence to the contrary. Some have suggested that one could only travel back as far as the first time travel device.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 17 Feb 18 6.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
You've been watching too much X Files The truth IS out there.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 17 Feb 18 7.03pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Vaibow
This is a fantastic conspiracy theory - basically time travel is possible through manipulation of matter through vibration. Magnets set up, speakers set up, a certain frequency wave is produced which levitates objects or it's elements/atoms merge with that around it. So they tried to transport an entire navy ship to the future without telling the crew, it went wrong and the ship basically go broken down at a sub atomic level and then when the vibration stopped, everything seemed back to normal... trouble is, the men and women onboard, some were dead, fused to the bulk head, some went mad with what they saw... some missing... fascinating. I saw that movie in the 80's. I don't know about the reality of it but I'm am happy to accept the possibility that technology exists that is ahead of what the public knows about.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 17 Feb 18 7.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
You can if you don't mind an awkward interview with Captain Annorax. Temporal incursions tend to be frowned upon. In the real universe however consider whether it would violate any natural laws. Travel to the past would appear to violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics (one of whose implications is that the arrow of time can only move forwards), which is usually a pretty good sign that something's impossible. Superluminary travel would appear to violate the Special Theory of Relativity. However, laws of nature have in the past turned out to have been incorrectly or incompletely stated when more knowledge has become available (as in the case of Newton's model of gravity compared with Einstein's). Edited by chateauferret (17 Feb 2018 1.59am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 17 Feb 18 8.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Yup im buying a delorean I reckon that's gotta work as a time machine.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lyons550 Shirley 18 Feb 18 5.26pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I saw that movie in the 80's. I don't know about the reality of it but I'm am happy to accept the possibility that technology exists that is ahead of what the public knows about.
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the.universal 18 Feb 18 5.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Some have suggested that one could only travel back as far as the first time travel device. That would be pretty convenient for the conspiracy theorists. I don’t see how it would have any relevance to the physics though. It’s quite an arbitrary moment in the history of the world.
Vive le Roy! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 18 Feb 18 7.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the.universal
That would be pretty convenient for the conspiracy theorists. I don’t see how it would have any relevance to the physics though. It’s quite an arbitrary moment in the history of the world. I think the idea is that you need to have a port to travel to and from. Without such an invention existing first, there is nowhere to travel to.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 18 Feb 18 7.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I think the idea is that you need to have a port to travel to and from. Without such an invention existing first, there is nowhere to travel to. Alas, the only port to exist so far was under the Reichstag in 1945. It was destroyed by the Fuhrer's acolytes.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 18 Feb 18 8.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Alas, the only port to exist so far was under the Reichstag in 1945. It was destroyed by the Fuhrer's acolytes. You are suggesting that there was a time travel device under the Reichstag? This was on the History channel no doubt. Is this related to the infamous invention know as Die Glocke.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.