The Wilfried Zaha Thread
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 taylors lovechild  07 Feb 19 8.37am |
  |
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Wilf is at his best when he isn't overthinking things. He is a maverick and he just needs people to trust and support his abilities, even if occasionally he gets hot headed. I couldn't give a flying f*ck if that harms his ability to get a transfer to a big club. They would just use him up and toss him aside on their neverending conveyor belt of multi-million pound signings.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
coulsdoneagle  London 07 Feb 19 8.45am |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Wilf has a pretty good disciplinary record on the whole. He rarely gets red cards and that performance against Southampton was exceptionally poor from the ref. All these comparisons to Hazard, I actually think Wilf is far more fouled than him but the statistics don’t show that because Hazard gets the protection from the referees and they spot them. With Wilf the sheer volume of fouls he receives means referees miss some whether by accident or by subconsciously trying to avoid blowing up 10 times a match for a foul on one player.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Charlie Croker  Hampshire 07 Feb 19 9.08am |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by coulsdoneagle
Wilf has a pretty good disciplinary record on the whole. He rarely gets red cards and that performance against Southampton was exceptionally poor from the ref. All these comparisons to Hazard, I actually think Wilf is far more fouled than him but the statistics don’t show that because Hazard gets the protection from the referees and they spot them. With Wilf the sheer volume of fouls he receives means referees miss some whether by accident or by subconsciously trying to avoid blowing up 10 times a match for a foul on one player. This^^ I'm sure someone can look up the stats in various places, but I doubt there are many sites that will show % of fouls that should have been given - and weren't. That is what winds Wilf and the fans up. Does he react? Yes. And in a nutshell, that is the underlying issue. Referees will give fouls for Hazard (69 this season) and not always for Wilf (63)*. If he'd been given a bit more protection, I think those figures would be more equal - and Wilf has played 3 less games. The other things that these do not take into account are the type of foul. Niggly pull backs to stop a breakaway are counted the same as a potential leg breaker. From the CFC football I have seen this season, Hazard does not get the same type of foul against him. *figures from Talkshyte, so probably not entirely accurate. Edited by Charlie Croker (07 Feb 2019 9.09am)
“My experience of life is that it is not divided up into genres; it’s a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you’re lucky." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Ginger Pubic Wig Wickham de L'Ouest 07 Feb 19 9.37am |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by coulsdoneagle
Wilf has a pretty good disciplinary record on the whole. He rarely gets red cards and that performance against Southampton was exceptionally poor from the ref. most yellows of any forward in the prem this year, now joint top for reds.
If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| bicycle repair man 07 Feb 19 10.21am |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle It's a bit silly comparing Wilf with Hazard.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chris123 hove actually 07 Feb 19 10.31am |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by bicycle repair man
It's a bit silly comparing Wilf with Hazard. Agree - the stats are misleading and don't show fouls not awarded. We know from the Watford episode that Wilf is a target. And if the tackle on Andros against Southampton isn't even a free kick, the lack of consistency is glaring - and when it's you being kicked - very frustrating.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| spartakev2 Anerley 07 Feb 19 10.45am |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by bicycle repair man
It's a bit silly comparing Wilf with Hazard. But he also complains on a lot of occasions when it's not actually a foul, but he believes it is . Seems to think every time he's tackled it's a foul. ...
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 AERO 07 Feb 19 11.55am |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle So what’s the situation with Wilf ? Take it as no news on ban he is available for Saturday
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| stayloa Beckenham 07 Feb 19 12.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by AERO
So what’s the situation with Wilf ? Take it as no news on ban he is available for Saturday I'm hoping that we're playing a blinder and the requesting of the hearing (with application made at the 11th hour) was enough to push the decision making beyond Saturday so he can play against West Ham and if he is banned, he sits out the cup game... I'm not sure it works like that, mind. Presumably if they make a decision tomorrow, he would still be banned for Saturday?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Ginger Pubic Wig Wickham de L'Ouest 07 Feb 19 12.50pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle He should try a five game trial where he never so much as looks at, let alone questions, a single referee decision. he's become as close as possible to a pantomime villain as far as away fans are concerned. their booing & mock anger, while idiotic, is also likely to influence the ref & wind him up. then he flaps his arms about, then they boo him more, then refs get influenced...and so it goes on. even Watford fans -- Watford -- have got at him and influenced the refs
If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Painter Croydon 07 Feb 19 1.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by bicycle repair man
It's a bit silly comparing Wilf with Hazard. It has been suggested it’s a race issue, why Zaha isn’t getting protection from the refs in the media.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Tickled pink Cornwall 07 Feb 19 2.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle Originally posted by Painter
It has been suggested it’s a race issue, why Zaha isn’t getting protection from the refs in the media. Zaha was booked for the incident with Prowes because he went over to him for an argument, the Burnley incident didn't involve the player who fouled just the linesman, but he still should've been booked, no question.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.