You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
May 1 2024 3.51pm

2020 US Presidential Election. (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 104 of 442 < 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 >

Topic Locked

View davenotamonkey's Profile davenotamonkey Flag 04 Nov 20 11.45am Send a Private Message to davenotamonkey Add davenotamonkey as a friend

Kamala's won this IMO, and it will likely be due to a state (PA) that they've pledged to destroy the economy and jobs of if he's elected. You get the leader you deserve (see also: Mayoral race in Portland).

The Democrat ballot printing presses are going into overdrive now - I'll bet you can see the heat they're giving off from space.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View davenotamonkey's Profile davenotamonkey Flag 04 Nov 20 11.48am Send a Private Message to davenotamonkey Add davenotamonkey as a friend

Originally posted by CPFC1965

Four more years of Trump will definitely irk the liberal left all over the globe, provide comedians and political pundits endless ammunition but gives the UK the best possibility of a free trade deal with the US. Many may not like him but I'd sooner do a deal with Trump than with Biden, a politician that puts the interests of China, Ukraine, Russia and whoever else is in the Biden's little black book first above ourselves.

FIFY. I guess we'll never get that investigation into their little rackets. The FBI will presumably be stood down on the criminal investigation they kept awfully quiet about.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 04 Nov 20 11.54am

Originally posted by davenotamonkey

Kamala's won this IMO, and it will likely be due to a state (PA) that they've pledged to destroy the economy and jobs of if he's elected. You get the leader you deserve (see also: Mayoral race in Portland).

The Democrat ballot printing presses are going into overdrive now - I'll bet you can see the heat they're giving off from space.

The thing is they obviously aren't printing ballots are they. We've just entered wacky world where people are so intent on disliking one side that they will believe absolutely anything that supports that. Clearly Trump's focus on ballots was due to it being a method of voting prefered by democrats (due to covid). If more republicans voted that way he would not have said a thing about it. He's king of the grifters, and I almost admire him for how far it's got him, but we should be in awe of the bulls*** rather than actually believe it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View The Dolphin's Profile The Dolphin Flag 04 Nov 20 11.55am Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

Originally posted by davenotamonkey

Kamala's won this IMO, and it will likely be due to a state (PA) that they've pledged to destroy the economy and jobs of if he's elected. You get the leader you deserve (see also: Mayoral race in Portland).

The Democrat ballot printing presses are going into overdrive now - I'll bet you can see the heat they're giving off from space.

Weird isn't it.
Pennsylvania - like Turkeys voting for Christmas

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Matov's Profile Matov Flag 04 Nov 20 11.57am Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay

The thing is they obviously aren't printing ballots are they. We've just entered wacky world where people are so intent on disliking one side that they will believe absolutely anything that supports that.

Postal ballots though are how you can game an electoral process. All sorts of ways, as we see in a lot of local elections, especially up north.

But your wider point is correct. And if it had been the other way around I am sure that this would be a point raised by those opposed to Trump.

Whatever the outcome, there is no real winner in this. The divisions have been cemented, with no sign of that changing.

Scary times.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 04 Nov 20 12.04pm

Originally posted by Matov

The issue is, if we all took a step back, is that the polarisation of almost all of us is now at the stage where by is there any chance of common ground? On anything?

Been listening/reading a lot about the impact of Social Media recently on our brains and how the entire phenenoman is skewed to essentially drive us all into more extreme postions on almost anything because that is what drives up viewing/watching/listening figures. It is, quite literally, driving us all insane.

Where does it all actually end up?


You're entirely right. The guy (Tristan Harris) did a very sobering interview with Joe Rogan recently and it's well worth a listen [Link] The political landscape is a symptom of this sickness rather than an accurate reflection of our differences. I don't mean that in a happy clappy way, instead that we're addicted to platforms that only care about engagement (which often centres around conflict based on caricatures of others, and group polarisation news feeds that reward extreme and unquestioning versions of an approved perspective).

Realistically society can't function like this (and governments - our own and others - pick at these divisions and dial them up at will). This mindset has little even to do with others really either, it's our own unfortunate contortion, and even when we get our way politically, we soon scan the horizon for others to become outraged by, so there are no real winners.

One point he made in the interview regarding Taiwan highlighted that alternative approaches exist though. He said that their main social network instead of pushing engagement though anger or echo chambers, actually analyses content in such a way that it finds aspects of commonality from people of typically different perspectives and highlights that. At least with such a platform I can see how it wouldn't create false adversaries and would instead reward common ground and consideration of others. We need to incentivise social platforms that are more fireside chat and less line of coke. The ones we have right now hollow us out for their own financial gain and damage society.


Edited by BlueJay (04 Nov 2020 12.07pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View Matov's Profile Matov Flag 04 Nov 20 12.11pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by BlueJay


We need to incentivise social platforms that are more fireside chat and less line of coke. The ones we have right now hollow us out for their own financial gain and damage society.


Edited by BlueJay (04 Nov 2020 12.07pm)

Will have a listen. But that is a great line. Issue is the amount of time we all seem to spend looking at screens. Perhaps it is the Covid lockdown and having more time on my hands but I have realised how much more agressive I have become of late and have been trying to understand.

This idea of social media deliberately being structured to make us more angry makes so much sense. Even message boards like this which I guess where an original form of social media in many ways.

Reckon I need to take a break from them all. Not sure how much good it is doing me.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 04 Nov 20 12.14pm

Originally posted by SW19 CPFC

All seems to be coming down to Nevada – if Biden gets that, it's probably over. If Trump gets it, Biden is most likely done

To be honest I'd have rather Trump or Biden won by a country mile. An election this close at such a polarised time could push people over the edge. In a situation like this, the country is saddled with that exact same problem whoever 'wins'! But the whole system is f***ed anyway. A lying grifter, and an addled grandpa who sounds like he's sucking on a Werthers Original when he talks. Americans best and brightest! I guess corporate interests make bank whatever Punch and Judy show they put on for us.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
View samprior's Profile samprior Flag Hamburg 04 Nov 20 12.16pm Send a Private Message to samprior Add samprior as a friend

Originally posted by Matov

The issue is, if we all took a step back, is that the polarisation of almost all of us is now at the stage where by is there any chance of common ground? On anything?

Been listening/reading a lot about the impact of Social Media recently on our brains and how the entire phenenoman is skewed to essentially drive us all into more extreme postions on almost anything because that is what drives up viewing/watching/listening figures. It is, quite literally, driving us all insane.

Where does it all actually end up?


I couldn't agree more. It's warping people's minds on all sides on the political spectrum.

I log on to Facebook once every couple of months and that's more than enough for me. No Twitter,Instagram and whatever other rubbish is out there. Paying more attention to what you see, hear and read online than to daily real life interactions is not helpful or healthy in my opinion. Obviously there's a lot more factors involved but I think it plays a very key role into how divided things are/seem these days.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Matov's Profile Matov Flag 04 Nov 20 12.24pm Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by samprior

I couldn't agree more. It's warping people's minds on all sides on the political spectrum.

.

I think it goes beyond politics. I think it has now reached into every aspect of our lives. It needs to be somehow tempered but for the life of me, I do not have a clue about the how.

And apologies for derailing this thread a little. But with this result in the balance, and the stance many of us take on it, I do wonder if perhaps it could be a tipping point in terms of how we all have to cope with politics in the future.

I will argue on the grounds of policy until the cows come home that Trump is a better option than Biden. But, and for me this is the crux, how did we ever get to a stage where by either of them are the option?

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View samprior's Profile samprior Flag Hamburg 04 Nov 20 12.35pm Send a Private Message to samprior Add samprior as a friend

Originally posted by Matov

I think it goes beyond politics. I think it has now reached into every aspect of our lives. It needs to be somehow tempered but for the life of me, I do not have a clue about the how.

And apologies for derailing this thread a little. But with this result in the balance, and the stance many of us take on it, I do wonder if perhaps it could be a tipping point in terms of how we all have to cope with politics in the future.

I will argue on the grounds of policy until the cows come home that Trump is a better option than Biden. But, and for me this is the crux, how did we ever get to a stage where by either of them are the option?

Yes totally it's so pervasive. With people now growing up in a world where they know no world without social media is a big worry. Especially with platforms being pushed for younger audiences. It scares me seeing the kids of friends and the kids I work with so exposed to these things at such a young and developmental age.

And back on the Election front I'd also agree... the fact that the race is down to these two is the clearest sign the system is truly fu*ked. For me whoever wins, we will ultimately be the losers.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 04 Nov 20 12.39pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

It's amazing how much of the vote Trump has retained or gained, in spite of losses elsewhere.
Is it no-trust in Biden ? or perhaps fear of violence if Biden wins ?

I don't think it's either of those things. I am a member of several Trump-supporting FB groups so am well aware of their thinking. Much of it demonstrates a poor grasp of reality. They believe all the claims that Trump makes, distrust the media and circulate outragious conspiracy theories, the origin of which are obscure.

The Latinos have a strong dislike of anything that smells of socialism and that is milked until the cow is dry.

They are passionate and encouraged to mislead pollsters. They though are real victims of the attempt by Trump to treat his opinions and truth as equivalent.

Turnout is always key and my guess is that they have achieved a higher turnout.

Democracy itself is under threat. In the short term I worry hugely over what will now happen in the USA and the C19 crisis.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 104 of 442 < 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic