You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Transfer Updates
January 28 2023 11.01am

Transfer Updates

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 82 of 184 < 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 >

 

View manwitheagletattoo's Profile manwitheagletattoo Flag Somewhere in England 11 Aug 22 8.44am Send a Private Message to manwitheagletattoo Add manwitheagletattoo as a friend

Originally posted by dreamwaverider

Watkins??? That would be unreal.

I take it that is Oli Watkins Aston Villa, there is a report that he has had a bust up with the manager Gerrard.
Touching on Zaha and these reports that Chelsea are interested.Every transfer window there is always clubs links with Zaha. As with Wilf being in the last 12 months of his contract these rumours are going to grow. Zaha has stated he wants to test himself at the highest level and play Champion Leaque football, I donít have a problem with that ambition is a good thing but would the grass be greener on the other side specially at Chelsea.
At Palace Wilfís name is one of the first on the team sheet week in week out, I cannot see that happening at Chelsea. Manager of Tuchel calibre likes playing rotation and with the players that Chelsea are signing how many games is Zaha going to play and how much bench warming is he going to do this season for Chelsea compared to staying at Palace. Connor Gallagher and Lofus-Cheek are other examples I cannot see these two like Wilf if he did sign playing week in week out and I think out of these two at Chelsea Lofus Cheek will get preference over Gallagher.
Wilf pitch temperament is questionable, the one thing in my eyes that lets Wilf down. We see this week in week out players surround him as soon as he gets the ball he is picked on, because clubs know that he is a threat they can wind him up ( Watford in past prime example) instead of letting his football do the talking he has to get into spats on the pitch instantly his football is affected if he did go to Chelsea and get to play Champion Leaque, European referees are quick dishing out red cards unless Zahaís attitude changes dramatically are Chelsea going to take the risk.

 


South London & Proud
Sometimes I really wonder if family are really worth it.
Because it doesnít matter how time and affection you give
Itís never enough

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 11 Aug 22 9.08am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

A line up like this would surely even inspire the likes of myself and a garrulous, overly flowery individual who shall go unnamed for now!

Of the options there, and all that is being rumoured, Watkins and Gallagher would be my two most desirable options. Lozano a great player but I'm sceptical and AWB would be interesting however I have once again become a real Clyne fan.


Zaha - Watkins - Olise

Eze - Doucoure - Gallagher

TM - Andersen - Guehi - AWB/Clyne

Johnstone/Guaita

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View MrRobbo's Profile MrRobbo Flag Purley 11 Aug 22 9.11am Send a Private Message to MrRobbo Add MrRobbo as a friend

I'd love Watkins, but there isn't a snowballs chance in hell that Villa would let us have him either on loan, or for a fee shy of 60m

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 11 Aug 22 9.48am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by MrRobbo

I'd love Watkins, but there isn't a snowballs chance in hell that Villa would let us have him either on loan, or for a fee shy of 60m

I hold similar sentiments but I am also prone to dreaming until that window slams firmly shut as it so often does.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hudsoneagle's Profile Hudsoneagle Flag 11 Aug 22 10.44am Send a Private Message to Hudsoneagle Add Hudsoneagle as a friend

My initial thoughts about CG was that he was desperate to make an impact at Chelsea this year, and because of that heíd not be interested in coming back to Palace on loan again.

Now, after only making it on to the pitch in the 99th minute, which is a shame for the lad, I wonder if he will be wondering how he makes the World Cup team with those sort of appearances.

I do think he may leave on loan, but to another club, and not Palace. Am I right in thinking if we loan him again, it has to be with a view to signing him permanently? If that is the case, I can see him choosing a more straight forward loan somewhere else, with a view to having another crack at playing for Chelsea next season.

On a side note, I think this rule of having to go for a loan/buy in a second year loan deal is wrong. If a player has developed well at a loan club, and the parent club want to extend that development experience for the players welfare, then why put such an obstacle in the way? Perhaps, anything over two seasons should have such rules come into play. But one season is rarely long enough.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View mark_cpal785's Profile mark_cpal785 Flag 11 Aug 22 11.24am Send a Private Message to mark_cpal785 Add mark_cpal785 as a friend

Is no 2nd loan a new rule as not heard that one before? We had Batshuayi on 2 loans only.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View rossboss29's Profile rossboss29 Flag Portsmouth 11 Aug 22 11.37am Send a Private Message to rossboss29 Add rossboss29 as a friend

Originally posted by mark_cpal785

Is no 2nd loan a new rule as not heard that one before? We had Batshuayi on 2 loans only.

Iím pretty sure there is nothing stopping us for a loan only again this year. This would be a separate transfer not in conjunction with the first. Perhaps if it was two year continuous loan it may be different but nothing Iíve heard of .

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View rossboss29's Profile rossboss29 Flag Portsmouth 11 Aug 22 11.37am Send a Private Message to rossboss29 Add rossboss29 as a friend

Originally posted by Hudsoneagle

My initial thoughts about CG was that he was desperate to make an impact at Chelsea this year, and because of that heíd not be interested in coming back to Palace on loan again.

Now, after only making it on to the pitch in the 99th minute, which is a shame for the lad, I wonder if he will be wondering how he makes the World Cup team with those sort of appearances.

I do think he may leave on loan, but to another club, and not Palace. Am I right in thinking if we loan him again, it has to be with a view to signing him permanently? If that is the case, I can see him choosing a more straight forward loan somewhere else, with a view to having another crack at playing for Chelsea next season.

On a side note, I think this rule of having to go for a loan/buy in a second year loan deal is wrong. If a player has developed well at a loan club, and the parent club want to extend that development experience for the players welfare, then why put such an obstacle in the way? Perhaps, anything over two seasons should have such rules come into play. But one season is rarely long enough.

Doesnít have to have obligation to buy, can be a straight loan.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Croydon-Trucker's Profile Croydon-Trucker Flag Cahir 11 Aug 22 11.38am Send a Private Message to Croydon-Trucker Add Croydon-Trucker as a friend

Originally posted by Hudsoneagle

My initial thoughts about CG was that he was desperate to make an impact at Chelsea this year, and because of that heíd not be interested in coming back to Palace on loan again.

Now, after only making it on to the pitch in the 99th minute, which is a shame for the lad, I wonder if he will be wondering how he makes the World Cup team with those sort of appearances.

I do think he may leave on loan, but to another club, and not Palace. Am I right in thinking if we loan him again, it has to be with a view to signing him permanently? If that is the case, I can see him choosing a more straight forward loan somewhere else, with a view to having another crack at playing for Chelsea next season.

On a side note, I think this rule of having to go for a loan/buy in a second year loan deal is wrong. If a player has developed well at a loan club, and the parent club want to extend that development experience for the players welfare, then why put such an obstacle in the way? Perhaps, anything over two seasons should have such rules come into play. But one season is rarely long enough.

I think that rule applies to full season long loans and the season has already started so wouldnt apply in this case . Having said that i personally would love it if we signed him permanently.

 


Putin Go Fvck Yourself

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View eagleman13's Profile eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 11 Aug 22 12.04pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

The irish lad Kofi Balmer has signed, Official.

 


The Child Has Grown,
The Dream Is Gone, And,
I Have Become,
Comfortably Numb. . . .
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hudsoneagle's Profile Hudsoneagle Flag 11 Aug 22 12.05pm Send a Private Message to Hudsoneagle Add Hudsoneagle as a friend

I must admit, Iíve never seen the rule in writing, itís only what Iíve picked up from posters on this site.

If we can offer a straight forward loan, I can see CG choosing us over anyone else. He knows have valued he was, and he knows he will play in a system that suits him.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View AshfordEagle94's Profile AshfordEagle94 Flag Canterbury 11 Aug 22 12.10pm Send a Private Message to AshfordEagle94 Add AshfordEagle94 as a friend

Originally posted by Hudsoneagle

I must admit, Iíve never seen the rule in writing, itís only what Iíve picked up from posters on this site.

If we can offer a straight forward loan, I can see CG choosing us over anyone else. He knows have valued he was, and he knows he will play in a system that suits him.

I think if it was a straight forward loan I would probably steer clear unless we really haven't identified some form of alternative. With an option to buy or permanently from the off then I would love to. I just worry with a loan and nothing else, we just end up back here again next season

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 82 of 184 < 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Transfer Updates