You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > That documentary
February 8 2023 6.54am

That documentary

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

 

View CrazyBadger's Profile CrazyBadger Flag Ware 06 Dec 22 8.50am Send a Private Message to CrazyBadger Add CrazyBadger as a friend


So let me get this straight... Media slag off documentary criticising Media..

Discredit it before it's aired, sounds a very Media thing to do... and you expected what - a reasoned critique and admission of fault?

 


I like my coffee black, just like my metal

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 06 Dec 22 8.55am Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I won't be watching either. Firstly because it's of no interest and secondly because it's on Netflix and I won't pay for such things.

However, condemning it before it's been aired seems unreasonable.

That who-ever is doing the publicity has used a stock photo to illustrate a point they made has nothing to do with the Sussexes themselves. It's typical though of the Mail not to point this out.

It was not used as a stock photo, it was misleading the viewers by making out these 2 were involved. Total lie, which is not surprising given the amount of untruths they spewed to Oprah, but donít let your dislike of the Mail cloud your judgement.


Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 8.57am)

Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 9.02am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 06 Dec 22 9.05am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

It was not used as a stock photo, it was misleading the viewers by making out these 2 were involved. Total lie, which is not surprising given the amount of untruths they spewed to Oprah, but donít let your dislike of the Mail cloud your judgement.
Presumably if anyone on here does watch it and comments, you will not

Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 8.57am)

Not the only one. Seems there is also footage of photographers surrounding Trump's attorney and one of Katie Price's court appearances as well as one they had officially approved which are all offered up as examples of the nightmare they've had to endure.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View eagleman13's Profile eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 06 Dec 22 9.10am Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

It was not used as a stock photo, it was misleading the viewers by making out these 2 were involved. Total lie, which is not surprising given the amount of untruths they spewed to Oprah, but donít let your dislike of the Mail cloud your judgement.


Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 8.57am)

Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 9.02am)

WE has a mate who is a 'very senior sub-editor' for the Mail, he said so himself @ 11.32pm last night on the BBC thread, so this is where he gets his informed info from.

 


The Child Has Grown,
The Dream Is Gone, And,
I Have Become,
Comfortably Numb. . . .
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 06 Dec 22 10.26am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

To be quite honest, I couldn't give a flying f**k about either of them and see this as a self-indulgent, narcissistic exercise in massaging egos, self-promotion and void filling in lieu of not having any real purpose in life.

That Meghan seems quite sinister in her motives but I of course have no idea what she's up to and I am not sure what anybody else's expectations are from a grown bloke that's never had a job?

The only people I really loathe more than the ones featured in this b0llocks are those that are intent on watching, formulating opinions around and discussing it as though it is of any importance to society. The odd chat privately or on HoL is different however

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 06 Dec 22 11.41am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

It was not used as a stock photo, it was misleading the viewers by making out these 2 were involved. Total lie, which is not surprising given the amount of untruths they spewed to Oprah, but donít let your dislike of the Mail cloud your judgement.


Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 8.57am)

Edited by Spiderman (06 Dec 2022 9.02am)

The point is that it was the editorial team making the documentary who were responsible for that, and not the subject or the producers. The Mail accusing the Sussexes of something I doubt they were even aware of is what is par for their standards.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 06 Dec 22 11.43am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by eagleman13

WE has a mate who is a 'very senior sub-editor' for the Mail, he said so himself @ 11.32pm last night on the BBC thread, so this is where he gets his informed info from.

Was, not is. He retired some years ago.

He has given me a few insights though!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HKOwen's Profile HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 06 Dec 22 12.32pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

A sub editor is a glorified spell checker, their job is to edit other people's work.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 06 Dec 22 12.36pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Not the only one. Seems there is also footage of photographers surrounding Trump's attorney and one of Katie Price's court appearances as well as one they had officially approved which are all offered up as examples of the nightmare they've had to endure.

They'd literally pay people to have that much attention. Well one of them would anyway. The other one's a moron.

 


Patrick Vieira's
Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 06 Dec 22 7.30pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Only if it deserves it. I am not condemning it. I am not interested in it.

So when some on here watch it and slag it off you wonít defend harry and the trout as from your seat you wonít have an opinion. Just so we know what you mean!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View mezzer's Profile mezzer Flag Main Stand, Block F, Row 20 seat 1... 08 Dec 22 9.54am Send a Private Message to mezzer Add mezzer as a friend

Thinking of starting a sweepstake on how long it will take for the documentary "Meghan - My Story. The truth behind my relationship with Harry" about how the former Prince could not shake off the ingrained prejudices of having been a member of the British Royal Family.

I'll start the bidding at 5 years.

 


Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Nicholas91's Profile Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 08 Dec 22 10.04am Send a Private Message to Nicholas91 Add Nicholas91 as a friend

Originally posted by mezzer

Thinking of starting a sweepstake on how long it will take for the documentary "Meghan - My Story. The truth behind my relationship with Harry" about how the former Prince could not shake off the ingrained prejudices of having been a member of the British Royal Family.

I'll start the bidding at 5 years.

Will this include Harry asking her opinion on travelling by rail leading to a mental breakdown?

Rail = Underground Railroad = Reference to slavery = OH MY GOD!!!! RACISM and RACIST ABUSE!! THE GREATEST TRAGEDY TO EVER BEFALL SOMEONE SO PRIVILEGED!!! THE WHOLE WORLD MUST KNOW!!! Oh and, you know, Meghan gets plenty of attention, perhaps some sort of social veneration, maybe a few murals that kind of thing. And of course money, LOADS O' MONEY!!!

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 4 < 1 2 3 4 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > That documentary