There appears to be no firm evidence against Letby, for either the attempted murders or murders. From the court coverage it seems to be based on interpretation of Letby's diary, staff whispers, circumstances and some skewed statistics over child deaths. None of which would lead to a conviction. From what I've read, this case probably shouldn't have proceeded after submission of 'evidence' to the CPS.
If Letby isn't convicted, then you would have to wonder about her suing for malicious prosecution, workplace bullying, defamation of character etc, etc
10 months of this for the jurors, let's hope the rest survive long enough to give a verdict.

"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak

How can you find someone guilty beyond reasonable doubt when you are the people who (the jury) have the doubt yourselves.

I would like to know since this all came out and she has been on trial has the baby deaths / injuries stopped?

The judge now accepting 'majority verdicts'.

That's exactly the problem, they 'want it over'.

At least one juror not on board, and one retired.

It'll be a war of attrition in the Jury Room. It's been a few days now, and people tend to become entrenched. A Guilty majority verdict will be going straight to Appeal.

"The facts have changed", Rishi Sunak