Nuclear fusion
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 matt_himself  Matataland 17 Oct 16 8.32pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
A couple of weeks ago, something happened that truly might change mankind's future: This is momentous and hopefully, the development will continue.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| chris123 hove actually 17 Oct 16 8.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
A couple of weeks ago, something happened that truly might change mankind's future: This is momentous and hopefully, the development will continue. Good news for my mobile.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Oct 16 9.37am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
A couple of weeks ago, something happened that truly might change mankind's future: This is momentous and hopefully, the development will continue. Arguably this would be one of two potential technologies that would completely change human perspectives of the world. This and nanotechnology could effectively create a new epoch of humankind
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| johnmcormick8 Brundish 18 Oct 16 9.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
Excellent news
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| richard shaw (og)65 my minds eye 18 Oct 16 10.45am |
|
|---|---|
|
amazing stuff , but isn't the problem with nuclear power the waste takes ages to cool down and be safe , or is this stuff different , it don't really say in the article
interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cb1969 Back in the 'hood 18 Oct 16 10.50am |
|
|---|---|
|
Great to see but we all know the oil companies will just buy the technology for billions to continue our reliance on fossil fuels
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 18 Oct 16 12.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by richard shaw (og)65
amazing stuff , but isn't the problem with nuclear power the waste takes ages to cool down and be safe , or is this stuff different , it don't really say in the article I'm not an expert by any means but isn't it nuclear fission that causes the problems? I seem to recall that fusion is a different ball game altogether.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Oct 16 12.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
I'm not an expert by any means but isn't it nuclear fission that causes the problems? I seem to recall that fusion is a different ball game altogether. Yes, nuclear Fission generates far more radiation. The process of fission is splitting atoms, where as fusion if binding them together. The radiation particles produced as a result are much lower (also Fusion occurs in nature, whilst fission doesn't) as its the means by which stars burn. The only thing I think approaching a fusion reaction is in the Hydrogen bomb with uses a fission trigger to generate something akin to a fusion reaction from the fission reaction.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Oct 16 12.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by richard shaw (og)65
amazing stuff , but isn't the problem with nuclear power the waste takes ages to cool down and be safe , or is this stuff different , it don't really say in the article Cool down might be an issue, as fusion whilst generating an enormous amount of energy from a reaction, requires a massive amount to energy to begin with (in nature, Fusion is what generates the heat of the sun).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 18 Oct 16 1.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Yes, nuclear Fission generates far more radiation. The process of fission is splitting atoms, where as fusion if binding them together. The radiation particles produced as a result are much lower (also Fusion occurs in nature, whilst fission doesn't) as its the means by which stars burn. The only thing I think approaching a fusion reaction is in the Hydrogen bomb with uses a fission trigger to generate something akin to a fusion reaction from the fission reaction. Out of the entire HOL readership, I just knew it'd be you who came to my rescue.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| richard shaw (og)65 my minds eye 18 Oct 16 1.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Cool down might be an issue, as fusion whilst generating an enormous amount of energy from a reaction, requires a massive amount to energy to begin with (in nature, Fusion is what generates the heat of the sun). ok , makes sense , what I understand is the by product or waste from your bog standard nuclear power station are the rods that don't cool from their ridiculous temperature for ages . these things have to be stored in impenetrable concrete bunkers .so there must be some sort of waste that doesn't cool down with this new process , if not happy days
interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
nairb75  Baltimore 18 Oct 16 3.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
"Still, its record is likely to stand for some time - at least until 2032, when the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (better known as ITER) is due to open in the south of France." such ambitious timelines! Edited by nairb75 (18 Oct 2016 3.05pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.