You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Penalty takers need to be designated immediately.
April 28 2024 10.23pm

Penalty takers need to be designated immediately.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 > Last >>

 

View Flies Like An Eagle's Profile Flies Like An Eagle Flag Lagos 09 Dec 17 7.13pm Send a Private Message to Flies Like An Eagle Add Flies Like An Eagle as a friend

With Luka we have a demon penalty taker who has at the moment a 100% record for us. So why was Benteke allowed to take the second penalty just to try and stroke his ego and to avoid himself going on his personal losing streak without scoring in the premiership combined with his abysmal record of missing penalties for Palace. Is it just weak captaincy from Dann or does the blame with the failure of the manager to designate the order of penalty takers in the first place?

When I saw Benteke step up to take the penalty I just knew it would all end in tears before bedtime. Grrrr....

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 09 Dec 17 7.17pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

They are designated.

Read posts before starting new threads and duplicate threads discussing what's already been discussed mins ago. Grrrrr.

Merge thread please.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Jefroc's Profile Jefroc Flag Crete 09 Dec 17 7.18pm Send a Private Message to Jefroc Add Jefroc as a friend

NEVER allow Benteke take a penalty. Christian DO YOU HEAR ME.YOU HAVE COST PALACE SO MANY POINTS WITH YOYR PRATISH PENALTY BEHAVIOR! GROW UP!!

 


Always remembering walking from the Holmesdale to the Whitehorse end at half time!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View thechaddyboy's Profile thechaddyboy Flag Peterborough 09 Dec 17 7.19pm Send a Private Message to thechaddyboy Add thechaddyboy as a friend

I thought this had all been ironed out after he missed the last one, but, in the dying seconds of a hard fought game where 3 points would take us out of the bottom 3 someone should have stood up to him & said 'No' appreciate he wanted to score after such a lengthy dry spell but that was not the time to pull rank. Blokes a selfish fool.

 


Red & Blue since 73'

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Casual's Profile Casual Flag Orpington 09 Dec 17 7.21pm Send a Private Message to Casual Add Casual as a friend

If he’s just picked the ball up and taken it, knowing he shouldn’t , he should be fined. £100 million pound fine if we are relegated by 1 or 2 points.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Booted Eagle's Profile Booted Eagle Flag Bristol 09 Dec 17 7.24pm Send a Private Message to Booted Eagle Add Booted Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Casual

If he’s just picked the ball up and taken it, knowing he shouldn’t , he should be fined. £100 million pound fine if we are relegated by 1 or 2 points.

Too small, his wages will probably cover that with some to spare.

 


“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ”
—United States Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Painter's Profile Painter Flag Croydon 09 Dec 17 7.35pm Send a Private Message to Painter Add Painter as a friend

Originally posted by Flies Like An Eagle

With Luka we have a demon penalty taker who has at the moment a 100% record for us. So why was Benteke allowed to take the second penalty just to try and stroke his ego and to avoid himself going on his personal losing streak without scoring in the premiership combined with his abysmal record of missing penalties for Palace. Is it just weak captaincy from Dann or does the blame with the failure of the manager to designate the order of penalty takers in the first place?

When I saw Benteke step up to take the penalty I just knew it would all end in tears before bedtime. Grrrr....

Dann wasn't captain, so why are you blaming him.

Benteke is at fault, if Luca had taken it and missed nobody would be angry due to his record.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View PalazioVecchio's Profile PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 09 Dec 17 7.46pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

chosen penalty takers...

1. luka
2. dann
3. zaha
4. the tea lady
5. the toilet cleaners

and never Benteke

 


Eze Peasy at Anfield....

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View kennybrowns leftfoot's Profile kennybrowns leftfoot Flag Reigate 09 Dec 17 7.54pm Send a Private Message to kennybrowns leftfoot Add kennybrowns leftfoot as a friend

Hodgson has made it clear in his interview that we have designated penalty takers and Benteke isn't one of them.

He was being polite but you could see he was fuming.

 


Don't waste your time with jealousy. Sometimes your ahead, sometimes your behind, the race is long. But in the end it's only with yourself!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View LegalEagle2010's Profile LegalEagle2010 Flag 09 Dec 17 8.11pm Send a Private Message to LegalEagle2010 Add LegalEagle2010 as a friend

All this talk about 'designated penalty takers' and 'why didn't Luka just grab it off him' and 'why didn't the captain/ the bench tell Benteke to walk away' is (almost) annoying me as much as what actually happened.

Firstly, we clearly do have a designated taker. It is Luka. How can anyone think different. It is the reason why he bloody took the first one despite Benteke being on the pitch.

Secondly, as Roy said in one post match interview I have seen, the bench cannot walk onto the pitch and tell the players what to do ... they have already done that in training before the match where they have already designated Luka as our penalty taker.

So that leaves the players on the pitch. I was at the game. Luka looked almost inconsolable about what was happening. He stood in the box for ages, pleading with Benteke. He was pulling his shirt up almost over his head in panicked frustration. But Benteke simply stood there, not looking at Luka, blinkers on, refusing to move.

So think about what you are saying by stating that Luka/ Dann/ whoever else simply shouldn't have let Benteke take it. Given how it played out, they would have had no option but to PHYSICALLY drag Benteke out of the box.

Think about what that would have looked like. A penalty in the last minute, prefaced by a physical altercation involving our players. It would have had to have been that, Benteke was going nowehere. Think about what effect on morale that would have had, how it would have looked in the press. It is simply inconceivable that one professional would wrestle another one out of the box over a penalty.

Further, think about the effect it would have had on Luka! The pressure that would have been on him having just physically dragged a team mate out of the box (or alternatively watched someone else do it to Benteke).

Even if Benteke had relented to Luka's constant pressure without a physical confrontation (and it was constant pressure -- he demonstratively did not simply acquiesce to Benteke), think about the pressure that would have left on his shoulders. Pressure that would already have been extraordinary given the match situation.

Therefore, it is ENTIRELY Benteke's fault as to what happened. Not anyone else's. As I mentioned, even if he had relented, the damage would have been done (in terms of added pressure to Luka).

It is the most selfish act I have ever witnessed at Selhurst.

I only hope that the journalists and pundits who discuss the incident think about ( a ) the fact that we DO have a penalty taker and not blame it on a false 'confusion'. And ( b ) what they actually mean by saying 'someone should have told Benteke to back off'.

They did. He refused. Would they advocate a wrestling match? surely not, the ramifications are so awful.

One might think, well, the ramifications would be worth it for Luka to score the penalty for the three points. But, of course, he was not guaranteed to score, and especially not if he was taken it after such a furore. So by the time Benteke took it, I can understand the players thinking 'right ... he's got it now ... so let's back him. It's a penalty so he should score.'

I make clear that none of this changes my ultimate view, that how dare Benteke put his own selfish desire to end his drought before his teammates, the club, and the fans. Particularly when he is famously awful at taking bloody penalties in any event.

I am beyond angry. But let's direct it in the right, informed, logical place.


Edited by LegalEagle2010 (09 Dec 2017 8.13pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View cryrst's Profile cryrst Flag The garden of England 09 Dec 17 8.23pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by LegalEagle2010

All this talk about 'designated penalty takers' and 'why didn't Luka just grab it off him' and 'why didn't the captain/ the bench tell Benteke to walk away' is (almost) annoying me as much as what actually happened.

Firstly, we clearly do have a designated taker. It is Luka. How can anyone think different. It is the reason why he bloody took the first one despite Benteke being on the pitch.

Secondly, as Roy said in one post match interview I have seen, the bench cannot walk onto the pitch and tell the players what to do ... they have already done that in training before the match where they have already designated Luka as our penalty taker.

So that leaves the players on the pitch. I was at the game. Luka looked almost inconsolable about what was happening. He stood in the box for ages, pleading with Benteke. He was pulling his shirt up almost over his head in panicked frustration. But Benteke simply stood there, not looking at Luka, blinkers on, refusing to move.

So think about what you are saying by stating that Luka/ Dann/ whoever else simply shouldn't have let Benteke take it. Given how it played out, they would have had no option but to PHYSICALLY drag Benteke out of the box.

Think about what that would have looked like. A penalty in the last minute, prefaced by a physical altercation involving our players. It would have had to have been that, Benteke was going nowehere. Think about what effect on morale that would have had, how it would have looked in the press. It is simply inconceivable that one professional would wrestle another one out of the box over a penalty.

Further, think about the effect it would have had on Luka! The pressure that would have been on him having just physically dragged a team mate out of the box (or alternatively watched someone else do it to Benteke).

Even if Benteke had relented to Luka's constant pressure without a physical confrontation (and it was constant pressure -- he demonstratively did not simply acquiesce to Benteke), think about the pressure that would have left on his shoulders. Pressure that would already have been extraordinary given the match situation.

Therefore, it is ENTIRELY Benteke's fault as to what happened. Not anyone else's. As I mentioned, even if he had relented, the damage would have been done (in terms of added pressure to Luka).

It is the most selfish act I have ever witnessed at Selhurst.

I only hope that the journalists and pundits who discuss the incident think about ( a ) the fact that we DO have a penalty taker and not blame it on a false 'confusion'. And ( b ) what they actually mean by saying 'someone should have told Benteke to back off'.

They did. He refused. Would they advocate a wrestling match? surely not, the ramifications are so awful.

One might think, well, the ramifications would be worth it for Luka to score the penalty for the three points. But, of course, he was not guaranteed to score, and especially not if he was taken it after such a furore. So by the time Benteke took it, I can understand the players thinking 'right ... he's got it now ... so let's back him. It's a penalty so he should score.'

I make clear that none of this changes my ultimate view, that how dare Benteke put his own selfish desire to end his drought before his teammates, the club, and the fans. Particularly when he is famously awful at taking bloody penalties in any event.

I am beyond angry. But let's direct it in the right, informed, logical place.

So when your mates pissed and goes to get in his car you don't stop him as it looks bad then and might cause a scene.
Get real
23k people eat breathe and love this club
Today in the ground
I'm sure if Luka missed after your scenario at least he would have hit it to get a chance.
We know Ben whatever for me now is a selfish player.
Ok an average game today for him but FFS he would struggle at tennis if the ball wasn't on elastic.
Ball to me I'm not running for it


Edited by LegalEagle2010 (09 Dec 2017 8.13pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View deetee's Profile deetee Flag 09 Dec 17 8.32pm Send a Private Message to deetee Add deetee as a friend

They are Luca is our penalty taker Benteke muscled in. Benteke has only scored 2 out of 5 pens time to say you will never take another penalty.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Penalty takers need to be designated immediately.