The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Mapletree  Croydon 08 Apr 19 11.28pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
When you say Brexit voters don’t want no deal - which deals do you think they anticipated at the time? My suspicion is that no deal was the assumed position. As ever, all guess work. ‘This isn’t what the people voted for’. Well prove it then. Truth is there would have been 17.4m different rationales.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
Teddy Eagle  08 Apr 19 11.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I believe the vote for Brexit could only have happened in a Britain that has forgotten what a European war was like, the fearfulness of the Cold War and the terror of Northern Ireland at the worst times. People get all brave again after a while. If Brexit happens I genuinely fear for the tenuous peace in Ireland. But then, when your sister gets showered with glass from an IRA bomb it kind of gets imprinted on the psyche. You’d have to be well over 80 to remember Europe at war. Maybe Brexit was voted for by people who are optimistic rather than driven by fear. I take your point about your sister - I was on the tube behind the one blown up at Aldgate in 2005 and see that ongoing threat to the country as more pressing.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Maine Eagle USA 08 Apr 19 11.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
When you say Brexit voters don’t want no deal - which deals do you think they anticipated at the time? My suspicion is that no deal was the assumed position. Teddy is that all that strikes you from my post? Nothing else you would care to address? Regarding your question, the verbiage of article 50 states under procedure, section 2, and I quote: A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3)[12] of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council [of the European Union], acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament. So I would say it was fairly clear that a withdrawal agreement would be negotiated, and it was not a widespread viewpoint that we would simply leave without a deal or any discussions or agreements with the EU on how to leave. If I recall one of the aforementioned pack of lies by the leave campaign was the whopper by Liam Fox that the deal would be the "easiest thing in human history". So I guess as this was one of the main lies of the era, about how easy the WA would be, then those people reading that understood there would be a deal, and we would not automatically leave with no deal.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 08 Apr 19 11.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Teddy is that all that strikes you from my post? Nothing else you would care to address? Regarding your question, the verbiage of article 50 states under procedure, section 2, and I quote: A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3)[12] of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council [of the European Union], acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament. So I would say it was fairly clear that a withdrawal agreement would be negotiated, and it was not a widespread viewpoint that we would simply leave without a deal or any discussions or agreements with the EU on how to leave. If I recall one of the aforementioned pack of lies by the leave campaign was the whopper by Liam Fox that the deal would be the "easiest thing in human history". So I guess as this was one of the main lies of the era, about how easy the WA would be, then those people reading that understood there would be a deal, and we would not automatically leave with no deal. The question remains. When given a binary choice to leave or remain what conditions do you think leavers anticipated? Had the choice been between several options then fair enough. But it wasn’t.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 08 Apr 19 11.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
When you say Brexit voters don’t want no deal - which deals do you think they anticipated at the time? My suspicion is that no deal was the assumed position
As per usual every leave voter seems to assume their perception of what leave meant is the right one / same as everyone else’s / the only option that was on the ballot paper etc etc etc Whatever At this rate, none of the above
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Maine Eagle USA 08 Apr 19 11.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
The question remains. When given a binary choice to leave or remain what conditions do you think leavers anticipated? Had the choice been between several options then fair enough. But it wasn’t. As I just said I believe they understood there would be the need to negotiate a withdrawal agreement, ergo no deal was not the default option.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 09 Apr 19 12.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
As I just said I believe they understood there would be the need to negotiate a withdrawal agreement, ergo no deal was not the default option. OK. You believe it. I don’t. Which using Abbott’s Formula means I lose by 750.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 09 Apr 19 12.05am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
When you say Brexit voters don’t want no deal - which deals do you think they anticipated at the time? My suspicion is that no deal was the assumed position
As per usual every leave voter seems to assume their perception of what leave meant is the right one / same as everyone else’s / the only option that was on the ballot paper etc etc etc Whatever At this rate, none of the above You assume I was a leave voter? For the record I wasn’t. I wasn’t a remain voter either.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
PalazioVecchio  south pole 09 Apr 19 12.05am |
|
|---|---|
|
to impose another Referendum upon the British public is a warcrime. its like a rapist refusing to listen to the voice of the victim, and insisting that they may change their mind about the whole thing.
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Maine Eagle USA 09 Apr 19 12.13am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
OK. You believe it. I don’t. Which using Abbott’s Formula means I lose by 750. Guess you missed Liam Fox's tweet/comments then, just a part of the top 10 of whoppers in the pack of lies spun by the Leave campaign.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 09 Apr 19 12.27am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Guess you missed Liam Fox's tweet/comments then, just a part of the top 10 of whoppers in the pack of lies spun by the Leave campaign. Right. Does anyone expect the truth? Every manifesto is a litany of lies. Theyre politicians - they lie for a living. Are all the remain scare stories true? No.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| PalazioVecchio south pole 09 Apr 19 12.30am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Right. Does anyone expect the truth? Every manifesto is a litany of lies. Theyre politicians - they lie for a living. Are all the remain scare stories true? No. the biggest lie was 1973. ''ah yes, but its only an economic union, for Trade and all that, nothing political, not a United States of Europe''
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.