Quite a vivid question put by a presenter on BBC this weekend.

Are radical Muslims the new Nazi's ?

(Obviously, not ALL Muslims, just the few radical ones)

I watched the disturbing pictures this morning of around 200 Iraqi soldiers who were captured by ISIS whilst in their barracks. They were then all butchered.

The depravity of mankind seems to be bottoming-out with the atrocities committed in the name of religion, and in particular, Islam.

As Britain, (formerly, Great Britain), tiptoes around human rights, and swerves racism, and allows Muslims to wear full face-masks, not just in public, but in airport departure points, (something that wouldn't have been tolerated during the decades of IRA activity)
Isn't it time to marginalise the radical groups/individuals ?
In the IRA case, Britain even used internment. But how do you combat an enemy, who have largely blended into the population, whether on these shores, or in foreign lands, and only make themselves known once the suicide bomb has detonated, the kidnap has occurred, or the streets are running in blood.(tips a nod to Enoch)

Am I scare-mongering, or are these radicals a significant problem ? 9/11, 7/7, 'The Muslim Patrols' in London, and now the mobilisation of militia who are causing atrocities in the name of Islam in the power vacuum created by western military withdrawl.

Would I have a happier life if I stopped reading/watching The News, or would I be complicit in ignoring issues outside my own tiny sphere of influence ?

Edited by Forest Hillbilly (16 Jun 2014 8.08am)

I disengage, I turn the page.

Yes.

Where 36% of British ms,ins agree with death for apostasy then the answer is yes.

Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial

Only if you boil it right down to being murder thugs

There is a lot of difference between National Socialism and the extremist Islamist movemenets (violent and non-violent) - indeed theres a lot of difference between Islamist groups, such as Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and Saudi - in fact that latter two hate each other quite passionately).

I don't think the two can really be compared except in terms of their authoritarianism. Certainly, the Nazi's wouldn't have had much truck with Islamism or Arabs except where it was convenient.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

I was thinking more of agents and anti-british/french movements, as that didn't involve a dose of nasty melty face.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

We would have to turn a blind eye to the opening of concentration camps for Jews (and probably Christians too)?

Not a chance, too many of those groups really hate each other too much. Before they started exterminating the Jews, they'd be start in on the Sunni/Shiite. Those two sects of Islam really have an issue.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

-.-'

"The fox has his den. The bee has his hive. The stoat, has, uh... his stoat-hole... but only man chooses to make his nest in an investment opportunity.” Stewart Lee

Just so happens they all (mostly) appear to be Muslim these days, so your previous paragraph is nonsense, to be blunt.

"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Central African Rep - Christian extremists are killing others. Buddhists killing muslims in Burma and Sri Lanka. India kicks off from all angles once in a while as we know.

So whilst the vast majority of religious nutters threatening the west are of a wahabi influenced muslim persuasion there are other religious groups who are not muslim but are engaging in similar acts in Asia and Africa. Namely the killing of people who are not like them. They be religious nutters too and no point in pretending otherwise just because there are more Muslim ones.

Edited by Kermit8 (16 Jun 2014 2.18pm)

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]