Well there isn’t going to be another vote so why not apply that magnanimous attitude to the first one.

So how will brexit be delivered on a second vote?

And anyone with 3 brain cells can see the flaw in this argument.

Ask: would you change your vote? No.
Why do you expect anyone else to then?

Logically, it'll come up the same.

All this so called negative reality you speak of doesn't exist, the economy has grown and unemployment is at a record low for recent years.

It is your opinion that the result would be different and that opinion seems to be based on the fact that the "idiots" have been told how they should've voted, so will now comply. That's not really how human psychology works.

If I said: "Maine, you got it wrong. You're gullible and believed Tony Blair, aren't you a fool? You must vote again now you've seen how badly the EU has treated us, making sure you vote leave like a good boy, then we can forget all about this you thickie thickie" would you change your vote? Doubtful.

Please have more respect then to think this approach would work on the combined populations of Birmingham and Glasgow: and that's just to swing a tie.

If that's the case why did remainers like me vote?

If there was a second vote, I'd vote Brexit... just so I'm not associated with toy throwers out of prams like you...

There are winners and losers Main... maybe mommy dearest should have explained that to you...but when you're spoilt you're spoilt and that's it...

Don't listen to project fear and think about what's at stake...Democracy...

Incorrect as ever.

Mrs May ensured that it was a road to where we are because she is a Remainer. The Remainers in Parliament had no intention of allowing a proper Brexit.

Agreed

Kier Starmer recently said that over 150 Labour MPs wouldn’t vote for the potential agreement thrashed out between Jezza and Tezza without a so called “confirmatory vote”. That’s even if an agreement can actually be reached. Customs union is a huge sticking point.

MPs are bottling it, I completely agree with you there. Hundreds of them are not willing to implement brexit as they think millions of people were conned.

Ironically if the leave campaign had a little more integrity and ran a more honest effort, we might have left the EU already.

People like Farage are trying to say everyone understood a vote to leave in 2016 was a vote in support of a no deal exit but I think that is a huge lie.

Millions of people who voted to leave did not think they were voting for a no deal exit, they listened to David Davis and whoever else who said how easy a “deal” would be.

However millions of people probably actually did vote for a no deal exit.

But with enormous consequences and differences between may’s soft brexit, and a hard no deal brexit, there is no way all 17 ish million people voted for the same option.

Hence MPs cannot deliver one or the other of those options.

Hence you need a second vote.

Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.

Wisbech is entitled to his opinion but I don’t agree with that concept.

Politicians are unable to decide, Teddy.

That’s not hyperbole, it’s a fact. Look at the last 3 years.

Whether or not people think a second vote will somehow reverse brexit entirely, is moot. You may absolutely love the idea of a second vote, or you may absolutely detest that idea.

That matters not, as at this stage a second vote is the only route to an actual resolution one way or the other.

Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha.

It's the only way to a publically approved resolution, yes. There are plenty of scenarios that resolve without a second vote. Probably along the lines of what Liam Fox and Barclay have come out with today – Remain or No Deal. On that basis, and the basis of the vote split, Remain would theoretically have the advantage. If everyone that voted leave had voted for no deal? Then I think remain would lose.

Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.