You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 7 2026 11.56pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)


Page 1102 of 1552 < 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 >
Stirlingsays Flag 24 May 19 10.25am

Johnson for the win.

The MPs who don't like it should learn to hold their noses.....they gave us May and before that a lot of them thought Cameron was the bee's knees.....They have some cheek to think they know better.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Matov Flag 24 May 19 11.15am

Lets not get ahead of ourselves here. This is May we are talking about. A skid-mark that has, so far, resisted every attempt to be washed away.

There could well be a twist or turn to come in this. And yes, I am paranoid but she should, by any conventional measure of British politics, been gone a long, long time ago.

If she does depart then it has to be Johnson. Only one who can keep Corbyn out. He won twice in London. He plays well with the punters, having that horrendous 'x' factor nonsense that seems to matter more in politics. Our sort of Trump moment.

But I have no confidence in the fop-haired f***er what so ever.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Stirlingsays Flag 24 May 19 11.21am

Originally posted by Matov

But I have no confidence in the fop-haired f***er what so ever.

True, but at least we know he'll be shagging someone he shouldn't at some stage.....so at least he'll be good for a laugh.

And I imagine he'll throw out all this intersectional BS that May has implemented.....that goes pretty much against all of the grass roots.

I don't see Corbyn having a hope against Johnson.....a few jokes and a wink and he's toast.

The Tories would be mad to overlook him.....Essentially it should be DWTGWH.

Do What The Guardian Would Hate.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 May 2019 11.25am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

blackheatheagle Flag Beckenham 24 May 19 11.29am

I am honestly curious what BJ can bring when he obviously failed to take the leadership / ownership although he was backed with success of Brexit referendum and proposed nearly nothing meaningful during negotiations?

Please don`t say Gove trapped him as it can not be an excuse for a leader profile.

BJ, Gove and Andrea are the key persons who is responsible of giving the key to May.

 

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 24 May 19 12.34pm

I am intrigued to know why anyone thinks it matters who the Tories choose when it's Parliament as a whole who now control the agenda.

Being already split down the middle choosing a committed Brexiteer as PM would deepen and widen that split and not enable any kind of resolution. Add to that the fact that whatever is agreed still has to be accepted by the EU.

Parliament clearly will not allow a "no-deal" Brexit to be passed and I cannot see the EU being goaded into forcing one through the disruptive tactics of disenchanted British MEPs. I think they will find ways of handling them.

May's resignation therefore seems to me to be more likely to create more problems than it solves. As if we didn't have enough already.

I suppose there is still a chance that the Tories might regain enough sense to put forward two middle of the road choices to the membership for them to make a final decision and not include a hardliner. A choice between Amber Rudd and Jeremy Hunt makes sense. Then someone could make another attempt to find a path through this mess. Include any hardliner against one of them and the conservative shires would choose the hardliner and the mess gets deeper as a consequence.

I think though that it is now looking increasingly likely that Brexit will again have to be delayed until after a GE is held, which raises the spectre of a Corbyn led coalition, which is not a pretty sight to these eyes.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 24 May 19 12.41pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I am intrigued to know why anyone thinks it matters who the Tories choose when it's Parliament as a whole who now control the agenda.

Being already split down the middle choosing a committed Brexiteer as PM would deepen and widen that split and not enable any kind of resolution. Add to that the fact that whatever is agreed still has to be accepted by the EU.

Parliament clearly will not allow a "no-deal" Brexit to be passed and I cannot see the EU being goaded into forcing one through the disruptive tactics of disenchanted British MEPs. I think they will find ways of handling them.

May's resignation therefore seems to me to be more likely to create more problems than it solves. As if we didn't have enough already.

I suppose there is still a chance that the Tories might regain enough sense to put forward two middle of the road choices to the membership for them to make a final decision and not include a hardliner. A choice between Amber Rudd and Jeremy Hunt makes sense. Then someone could make another attempt to find a path through this mess. Include any hardliner against one of them and the conservative shires would choose the hardliner and the mess gets deeper as a consequence.

I think though that it is now looking increasingly likely that Brexit will again have to be delayed until after a GE is held, which raises the spectre of a Corbyn led coalition, which is not a pretty sight to these eyes.

Both 'Remainers', besides Amber Rudd could lose her seat in Hastings and Rye, only having a majority of 346.Conseervative membership is Pro-Brexit and to be presented with 2 'Remainers' would be 'Between 'A rock and a hard place' scenario.

Edited by Willo (24 May 2019 12.44pm)

 

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 24 May 19 1.03pm

Originally posted by Willo

Both 'Remainers', besides Amber Rudd could lose her seat in Hastings and Rye, only having a majority of 346.Conseervative membership is Pro-Brexit and to be presented with 2 'Remainers' would be 'Between 'A rock and a hard place' scenario.

Edited by Willo (24 May 2019 12.44pm)

I realise all of that but if the Tories choose a committed Brexiteer, as seems likely, then things will only get worse. I know that's what the membership want but they too are, in the main, hardline no-deal Brexiteers.

My speculation was whether the Tory MPs would have sufficient foresight not to take that route so as to avoid the decimation that would probably follow it.

As in all situations it is the job of the MP's to give their electorate what they need, which is not always what they want.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 24 May 19 1.39pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I realise all of that but if the Tories choose a committed Brexiteer, as seems likely, then things will only get worse. I know that's what the membership want but they too are, in the main, hardline no-deal Brexiteers.

My speculation was whether the Tory MPs would have sufficient foresight not to take that route so as to avoid the decimation that would probably follow it.

As in all situations it is the job of the MP's to give their electorate what they need, which is not always what they want.

When it comes to party elections MPs and members will vote for the person they think is best for the party. I don't recall any conversation like this when Corbyn was running for the leadership. It is simply a matter for the party concerned we will get our chance at the next GE.

 


One more point

blackheatheagle Flag Beckenham 24 May 19 1.57pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I am intrigued to know why anyone thinks it matters who the Tories choose when it's Parliament as a whole who now control the agenda.

Being already split down the middle choosing a committed Brexiteer as PM would deepen and widen that split and not enable any kind of resolution. Add to that the fact that whatever is agreed still has to be accepted by the EU.

Parliament clearly will not allow a "no-deal" Brexit to be passed and I cannot see the EU being goaded into forcing one through the disruptive tactics of disenchanted British MEPs. I think they will find ways of handling them.

May's resignation therefore seems to me to be more likely to create more problems than it solves. As if we didn't have enough already.

I suppose there is still a chance that the Tories might regain enough sense to put forward two middle of the road choices to the membership for them to make a final decision and not include a hardliner. A choice between Amber Rudd and Jeremy Hunt makes sense. Then someone could make another attempt to find a path through this mess. Include any hardliner against one of them and the conservative shires would choose the hardliner and the mess gets deeper as a consequence.

I think though that it is now looking increasingly likely that Brexit will again have to be delayed until after a GE is held, which raises the spectre of a Corbyn led coalition, which is not a pretty sight to these eyes.

If a Brexiteer is chosen as PM (which should happen in 2016) it will help to test the idea that a Brexiteer PM is capable to deliver Brexit with a concrete plan for UK by avoiding any devastating damage to economy but opening promising gates for trading as promised before referendum.

If he / she fails as well, that will probably end with GE. And after GE,

If Brexit Party wins with a reasonable majority, there will be no-deal Brexit.

If not, there will be no Brexit.

 

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 24 May 19 2.11pm

Originally posted by Badger11

When it comes to party elections MPs and members will vote for the person they think is best for the party. I don't recall any conversation like this when Corbyn was running for the leadership. It is simply a matter for the party concerned we will get our chance at the next GE.

I think it's more nuanced than that. Some have the vision to see what the consequences are likely to be and vote tactically so as to achieve part of what they want rather than nothing.

When Corbyn was elected there were plenty of people who pointed out the potential consequences of dragging Labour to the left, just as there are with the Tories dragging their party to the right. Without appealing to the masses in the middle neither party will ever command a majority for very long. Protest votes tend to evaporate very quickly.

I agree though that this all is likely to drag onto a GE is held but whether it gets sorted then is far from sure.


Edited by Wisbech Eagle (24 May 2019 2.11pm)

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 24 May 19 2.18pm

Deep down I think Wisbech is right on the process of the new Tory leadership. It’ll then go:

New Tory leader.

General election.

Labour offers a referendum with remain as an option. We might remain.

Tories either don’t or offer one without remain. Somehow hopefully the people will get Parliament to get this through somehow after so long of limited negative effects, and the realisation that most of the scaremongering was pure bollox might get through to even more people.

 


COYP

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 24 May 19 2.55pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I realise all of that but if the Tories choose a committed Brexiteer, as seems likely, then things will only get worse. I know that's what the membership want but they too are, in the main, hardline no-deal Brexiteers.

My speculation was whether the Tory MPs would have sufficient foresight not to take that route so as to avoid the decimation that would probably follow it.

As in all situations it is the job of the MP's to give their electorate what they need, which is not always what they want.

I admit to being a hardline no-deal Brexiteer so I don't share the view about any long-term decimation that would follow Brexit on WTO rules.I admit there are very many Conservatives I know who are of the same opinion.

Edited by Willo (24 May 2019 2.56pm)

 

cpfc_chap Flag koh samui 24 May 19 3.11pm

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Deep down I think Wisbech is right on the process of the new Tory leadership. It’ll then go:

New Tory leader.

General election.

Labour offers a referendum with remain as an option. We might remain.

Tories either don’t or offer one without remain. Somehow hopefully the people will get Parliament to get this through somehow after so long of limited negative effects, and the realisation that most of the scaremongering was pure bollox might get through to even more people.

If a general election does happen i'd expect many brixiteers taking the seats of the mps who went against there constituencies!

 

Midlands Eagle Flag 24 May 19 3.13pm

Originally posted by Badger11

When it comes to party elections MPs and members will vote for the person they think is best for the party. .

Listening to someone (I didn't catch his name) on Radio 5 this morning it seems that it isn't quite as honourable as that as many senior members ask "what's in it for me" before pinning their colours to his mast

 

Invalid user 2019 Flag 24 May 19 3.16pm

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Deep down I think Wisbech is right on the process of the new Tory leadership. It’ll then go:

New Tory leader.

General election.

Labour offers a referendum with remain as an option. We might remain.

Tories either don’t or offer one without remain. Somehow hopefully the people will get Parliament to get this through somehow after so long of limited negative effects, and the realisation that most of the scaremongering was pure bollox might get through to even more people.

He raises some interesting points. I don't see there being a General Election anytime soon though, as it'd probably wind up as inconclusive as the previous one.

The only exception to that I think is if a new leader such as Johnson, can convince the party to get behind a pure 'Leave' message, much as the way the Brexit Party has done. If they can, and rely on Corbyn's message to remain unclear, that would split the Labour vote somewhat.


 

Invalid user 2019 Flag 24 May 19 3.22pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

Listening to someone (I didn't catch his name) on Radio 5 this morning it seems that it isn't quite as honourable as that as many senior members ask "what's in it for me" before pinning their colours to his mast

I notice that the odds of Boris being the next Prime Minister are now even money, so in any leadership contest it looks like he's in pole position.

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 24 May 19 3.33pm

Originally posted by dollardays

I notice that the odds of Boris being the next Prime Minister are now even money, so in any leadership contest it looks like he's in pole position.

Fact remains that since 1965 the only constant in a Conservative leadership contest is that the favourite has not won.

 

Spiderman Flag Horsham 24 May 19 3.56pm

Originally posted by Willo

Fact remains that since 1965 the only constant in a Conservative leadership contest is that the favourite has not won.

Is that because they are forensically assessed?

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 24 May 19 3.59pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

Is that because they are forensically assessed?


 

becky Flag over the moon 24 May 19 4.01pm

The timing on all this is going to be very interesting. Generally, Parliament breaks for the summer recess about the third week in July and re-convenes first or second week in October, after Conference.

If they stick to this pattern, with May going on 7th June, there is very little time to settle the Leadership, form a new Cabinet, define any new strategy/policy and get that in place before the summer break and Conference.

After Conference, there is very little time, only a couple of week in fact, left before the extension to Article 50 expires (on 31st October). No time at all really to get anything sorted in Parliament.

Will the whole of Parliament give up their Summer vacation to sort things out? I won't hold my breath!

Will the EU give us a further extension to A50? Some of the noises reportedly coming from Macron and others would seem to imply that they are not keen - Macron has already stated once that he will veto any extension.

Interesting times, eh?

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

Page 1102 of 1552 < 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic