This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Mwncisee
I agree seeing this is very frustrating. But what is telling with many of you who are screaming Roy out is you fail to provide any serious suggestions as to what then. Who do you seriously think we can attract and will do a better job with what we have? It's easy to shout it needs to change (I don't think many would disagree) but not so easy to come up with solutions. Edited by Mwncisee (21 Jul 2020 11.34am) Its the owners responsibility to find the solutions. Thats not our job.
|
|
|
Originally posted by MonsterMunch
Its the owners responsibility to find the solutions. Thats not our job. I agree. And if you look back in this thread you will see I have repeatedly stated that we are all getting into a debate about the symptoms (Roy, aging squad, tactics, player selection etc) and not the cause which is an ownership and financing that is stagnant and stuck in the doldrums. Also if your argument is its not our job, which it isn't then its also not our job to pick the team, tactics and anything else, and let's face it we all do that! Can't have it both ways. Edited by Mwncisee (21 Jul 2020 11.58am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mwncisee
I agree. And if you look back in this thread you will see I have repeatedly stated that we are all getting into a debate about the symptoms (Roy, aging squad, tactics, player selection etc) and not the cause which is an ownership and financing that is stagnant and stuck in the doldrums. Read some of my posts which say that too. Unfortunately the anti Hodgson brigade only see one person to blame for everything.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
|
Originally posted by Mwncisee
I agree seeing this is very frustrating. But what is telling with many of you who are screaming Roy out is you fail to provide any serious suggestions as to what then. Who do you seriously think we can attract and will do a better job with what we have? It's easy to shout it needs to change (I don't think many would disagree) but not so easy to come up with solutions. Edited by Mwncisee (21 Jul 2020 11.34am) it's not the fans' job to come up with a solution - that's for the people that are paid handsomely at CPFC to identify and recruit the management and coaching team that will move the club forward. I think it's fair to say that we've burned through all the 'tried and tested' 'safe hands' Prem managers, so it is time to re-look at the ingredients of the chap to next take the reins. That work should have been being done over the last few years. Time will tell if that's the case.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Frickin Saweet
it's not the fans' job to come up with a solution - that's for the people that are paid handsomely at CPFC to identify and recruit the management and coaching team that will move the club forward. I think it's fair to say that we've burned through all the 'tried and tested' 'safe hands' Prem managers, so it is time to re-look at the ingredients of the chap to next take the reins. That work should have been being done over the last few years. Time will tell if that's the case. Again the 'its not the fans job' arguement. So why does anybody post anything on here? None of it is our job! But we all have views etc. It's not the fans job to have a manager sacked but many are calling for it. Again, can't have it both ways and if this is hitting the head of this it is illustrating just how hard it must be for the club to decide. Its a stick or twist situation with the risk of going bust.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mwncisee
Again the 'its not the fans job' arguement. So why does anybody post anything on here? None of it is our job! But we all have views etc. It's not the fans job to have a manager sacked but many are calling for it. Again, can't have it both ways and if this is hitting the head of this it is illustrating just how hard it must be for the club to decide. Its a stick or twist situation with the risk of going bust.
For the record I would go with Dyche. A palace type I feel.
|
|
|
Originally posted by taylors lovechild
Unless we were able to poach an experienced PL manager then we will struggle with the squad we have if Roy left (and even then we probably would). For all his detractors Roy knows how to get points and win ugly and while he clearly has flaws (such as his seeming inability to change things during the game) I believe he would see us comfortably mid-table again next season. Our ageing, depleted and small squad is not designed for playing two games a week on a regular basis and it has cost us since the lockdown. I don't understand why he still refuses to start Meyer or why Riedewald isn't getting more game time, but when you think these are the only fully-fit senior options available that are not defenders you can see what a task Roy has. I was listening to Peter Crouch saying how Pulis did zero work with the attacking players and just left them to it while focusing solely on the defensive side of the game. Sometimes it does feel like that is the case with us, but without a play maker we struggle when the 'stick it down the left channel' doesn't work. Maybe as well as some new players we could do with a new coach to work alongside Roy and Ray who could bring some new ideas to the attacking side of our game with the view to possibly succeeding Roy? I don't think there are many people desperate to keep Roy, I just think there are many, like me, who recognise that he has been given very little support and has somehow made us comfortable with very limited resources. The one thing that gives me hope is how well he had us playing at times when we had RLC. If we could get another high-quality player or two like that again I think we might see a different Palace. Not at the moment he doesn't!
|
|
|
Originally posted by MonsterMunch
For the record I would go with Dyche. A palace type I feel.
I feel our underlying problems began with the US investors who came with much fanfare of how it would be good for the club but have under delivered and/or their financing was diverted to transfers to keep us in the Prem. Those decisions are now coming home to roost. (Personally I do not blame SP for those decisions as they were taken well intentionally). Edited by Mwncisee (21 Jul 2020 1.05pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by PatrickA
This summer presents a conundrum for the club.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
|
Originally posted by PatrickA
This summer presents a conundrum for the club. Agree with most of this. Think that's is the preferred way out I just have doubts over our ability as a club to deliver on supplying the fresh faces. The Ferguson deal has gone very quiet. In theory a free transfer but looks like we would have to pay 4 mill in compensation. He has been injured and although we were willing to pay 11mill in Jan I have a feeling that Covid will hit the transfer kitty and we are now not willing to risk 4 mill on him. Doesn't bode well for us to be able to pay more for any flair players. I seriously doubt we will sign anything other than a couple of token younger free squad players. Roy will have to do with what he has got next season.
|
|
|
Originally posted by HesHereHesThere
In times of crisis leaders come to the fore....time to have a word on the mic Mr Parish and I don’t mean doing you’re own rendition of Rappers Delight...what’s your plan Mr Chairman to get us out of this s***? This with bells on. I really would like to hear the reality of what our finances are like as reading the tea leaves it looks bleak and where we are in reality with our investors. If fans knew the situation I think it is more likely they would get behind Roy and the players. A bit of humility rather than silence would go a long way.
|
|
|
"Why put off tomorrow, when its needed today" Originally posted by Crystal_Clear
A couple of things to address here. Firstly, I would say that Meyer, Rieldewald and even Slowloth (with his goal exploits in Turkey) are not bad players, they are just not suited the the Premier League. The problem with giving Roy money, is that come the end of next season he probably will have retired. So any incoming manager is left with what he bought, and they could be ill suited for the new manager. Therefore if funds are going to be made available, which quite frankly I doubt, then a new manager is also required as well.
|
|
|
Originally posted by radicalsteve
I wrote this post in August 2017: The problems with the squad and manager begin and end in the boardroom .... we have lousy owners who have a track record of only being interested the returns on their equity. Of course, CPFC is a business like anything else, but there will be no passion for success from the Yanks and they probably have Parish's nuts in a vice! Also coupled with the fact that SP wants others to put up money but for him to decide where to spend it. He is scared (rightly or wrongly) to give others control incase they undo his hard work.
|
|
|
PS Lol Originally posted by Crystal_Clear
A couple of things to address here. Firstly, I would say that Meyer, Rieldewald and even Slowloth (with his goal exploits in Turkey) are not bad players, they are just not suited the the Premier League. The problem with giving Roy money, is that come the end of next season he probably will have retired. So any incoming manager is left with what he bought, and they could be ill suited for the new manager. Therefore if funds are going to be made available, which quite frankly I doubt, then a new manager is also required as well.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.