You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 6 2026 7.18pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)


Page 1291 of 1552 < 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 >
Stirlingsays Flag 24 Sep 19 4.36pm

Originally posted by Alex1991

So 52% voted Leave, and within that 52% you have millions of people with a different view on how Brexit would happen. That 52% would have included a lot of people whose decision was close either way. This vote is now being hijacked by hard line Brexiteer's who are trying to tell people that this is what they voted for and blaming the EU for not giving them the trade deal they promised without having the knowledge it could be agreed.

That's a bit one eyed.

A lot of those 48 percent weren't actually fans of remaining in the EU but were frightened into it by project fear....a project that made lots of predictions for what would happen to our economy after the vote which didn't happen.

If remain had only those pro EU voters to rely on they would have barely got to thirty percent if that.

Lots of them want the EU to reform when the reality is the EU won't reform without actions like Brexit....and even then its path is seemingly set.

Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Sep 2019 4.39pm)

EU1.JPG Attachment: EU1.JPG (65.83Kb)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Stirlingsays Flag 24 Sep 19 4.37pm

Originally posted by Alex1991

Leaving was not compulsory. It was an advisory referendum.

So was the one which saw us join the EEC.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alex1991 Flag Ashford 24 Sep 19 4.40pm

Originally posted by Matov

A deal is not compulsory. That was never on the ballot paper. Leave or Remain was. Remain lost. The only valid debate is over the type of Leave but we should be out now. Extending it anymore only creates more uncertainty and upheaval.

Be honest. You want A50 revoked. Be a Lib-Dem and sing that from the rooftops. But please don't insult our intelligence by hiding that.

You are actually completely wrong about this. The best outcome now is that a decent deal is agreed. I don't want article 50 to be revoked, but if there is no movement on a deal and it is between no deal or revoking article 50 then yes, I'd want to revoke article 50.

 


"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017.

Matov Flag 24 Sep 19 4.41pm

Originally posted by Alex1991

Leaving was not compulsory. It was an advisory referendum.

Absolutely. So let Parliament revoke it. But, and I accept I am a little tedious about this, celebrate that. Cheer it on. I can respect that.

What I loathe is this vomit-inducing desire to give yourselves a cloak of democratic justification by way of another referendum when you are simply not willing to have the one on June 23rd honoured. You dont get a second go.

Cheer on a Parliament that has the courage to revoke A50 if you believe it should ignore 17.4 million votes. Believe in this system. Express your desire for it to act in accordance with your wishes.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 24 Sep 19 4.42pm

Originally posted by Alex1991

So you'd like to crash out without a deal and then re assess after the fact ?

Seriously?
Are you another Labour Party activist reading from a script?

I regard honouring the referendum result as paramount.

A 'no deal' would not remain so for long as no one benefits from a halt of trade with Europe.

The people driving the second referendum nonsense know this full well.

 

Alex1991 Flag Ashford 24 Sep 19 4.46pm

Originally posted by Matov

Absolutely. So let Parliament revoke it. But, and I accept I am a little tedious about this, celebrate that. Cheer it on. I can respect that.

What I loathe is this vomit-inducing desire to give yourselves a cloak of democratic justification by way of another referendum when you are simply not willing to have the one on June 23rd honoured. You dont get a second go.

Cheer on a Parliament that has the courage to revoke A50 if you believe it should ignore 17.4 million votes. Believe in this system. Express your desire for it to act in accordance with your wishes.

If the Brexit that was campaigned for was the Brexit that could actually be delivered I would be all for it. This is not the case, it will never be the case, and yet people are still clinging on to an ill advised and ill conceived referendum, the sole purpose of which was to shore up David Cameron's position.

 


"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017.

Alex1991 Flag Ashford 24 Sep 19 4.48pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Seriously?
Are you another Labour Party activist reading from a script?

I regard honouring the referendum result as paramount.

A 'no deal' would not remain so for long as no one benefits from a halt of trade with Europe.

The people driving the second referendum nonsense know this full well.

How do you know this ? Surely if a trade deal was as important to Europe as you think it is then this deal would have done 3 years ago.

 


"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 24 Sep 19 4.48pm

Originally posted by SW19 CPFC

'Proper Brexit' was definitely not on the ballot paper. I do wonder how many types of Brexit there are now...

The same applies to 'no deal'.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 24 Sep 19 4.49pm

Originally posted by Alex1991

How do you know this ? Surely if a trade deal was as important to Europe as you think it is then this deal would have done 3 years ago.

No. That is called negotiating.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards SW19 CPFC Flag Addiscombe West 24 Sep 19 4.53pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

The same applies to 'no deal'.

Precisely.

 


Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Alex1991 Flag Ashford 24 Sep 19 4.54pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

No. That is called negotiating.

So part of a negotiation is putting yourself in a bad situation in the hope that afterwards you'll get the deal you want ? Do you really believe that we'll get a better deal once we leave ? Or will we in fact get a much worse deal than the one that is on the table now because we have zero bargaining position.

 


"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards SW19 CPFC Flag Addiscombe West 24 Sep 19 4.58pm

Originally posted by Alex1991

How do you know this ? Surely if a trade deal was as important to Europe as you think it is then this deal would have done 3 years ago.

Europe will without question start negotiations after a no-deal exit. However in my view it's the worst, most unnecessarily disruptive way to go about it.

This is the point people are missing – once we leave on the 31st we then have to negotiate trade arrangements which could take at least another two years. Once we're 'out' all this dross is going to keep rumbling on for the foreseeable. End one procrastinating nightmare only to begin the next...

Leaving without a deal just means that process will take longer, at least it will with regards to the EU.

 


Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 24 Sep 19 4.58pm

Originally posted by SW19 CPFC

Precisely.

I expect most Leavers want what they were promised by the Leave campaign.
Control of law and European migrant numbers and with the freedom to trade with whomever they please.

Are you suggesting that a Brexit which is virtually the same or worse than remaining is acceptable?

 

W12 24 Sep 19 5.00pm

Two things that i’ve really learned from recent events:

1. Trust in “experts” and institutions is completely misplaced apart from very few circumstances e.g. doctors that have no conflict of interest
2. Duplicitous little s***s like Rory Stewart can f*** off

 

Invalid user 2019 Flag 24 Sep 19 5.01pm

With each twist and turn we're still no further forward in knowing what comes next.

Edited by dollardays (24 Sep 2019 5.02pm)

 

Alex1991 Flag Ashford 24 Sep 19 5.01pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

I expect most Leavers want what they were promised by the Leave campaign.
Control of law and European migrant numbers and with the freedom to trade with whomever they please.

Are you suggesting that a Brexit which is virtually the same or worse than remaining is acceptable?

Both of these things could have been controlled without leaving the EU.

 


"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017.

Alex1991 Flag Ashford 24 Sep 19 5.03pm

Originally posted by W12

Two things that i’ve really learned from recent events:

1. Trust in “experts” and institutions is completely misplaced apart from very few circumstances e.g. doctors that have no conflict of interest
2. Duplicitous little s***s like Rory Stewart can f*** off

I asked my GP last week if my medication would still be available after the 31st October and he told me he couldn't say either way. There you go, no conflict of interest, admitting that the situation is unknown. I find that quite scary.

 


"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 24 Sep 19 5.04pm

Originally posted by Alex1991

Both of these things could have been controlled without leaving the EU.

How? We are bound by European rules.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 24 Sep 19 5.05pm

Originally posted by Alex1991

I asked my GP last week if my medication would still be available after the 31st October and he told me he couldn't say either way. There you go, no conflict of interest, admitting that the situation is unknown. I find that quite scary.

Scaremongering.

TICK

 

Alex1991 Flag Ashford 24 Sep 19 5.07pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

How? We are bound by European rules.

EU Directive 2004/38/EC

“Where admission is permitted, an EU citizen may remain in the UK for up to three months from the date of entry, provided they do not become a burden on the social assistance system of the UK.

If an EU citizen does not meet one of the requirements for residence set out in the Directive [employed, self-employed, self-sufficient, student] then they will not have a right to reside in the UK and may be removed.”

The UK is free to implement this policy as it sees fit, and yet it does not, while other countries – including Belgium and Italy – use this legislation to repatriate thousands of EU migrants each year.

 


"Brighton are talking about how they're coming for us. And it's like, we've been waiting in the Premier League for you for ages." Wilfried Zaha, 2017.

Page 1291 of 1552 < 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic