To be fair it was in response to Geoffrey Cox's ridiculously emotive and over the top statement to the house.

I've agreed that the positions and hence language is highly polarised......that's what happens when people won't compromise.

We had three votes on a deal that no one really wanted which Johnson and co voted for on the last vote but instead the opposition decided to play 'win or bust'.

Let's not forget that there are no doubt remainer nutters out there as well. Johnson and co have been called all types of insult.....'dictator', 'Trump'...we have had the nonsense that he's pulled a 'coup'.

So with the language I'm wholly opposed to any restrictions on what is said in the chamber. It is a matter for that house to regulate. My opinions is I'd rather pull the cameras than restrict language.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

That's hilerious

Edited by dannyboy1978 (26 Sep 2019 10.14am)

It's further evidence, if any is really needed, of just how irresponsible and dangerous Johnsons's tactics are. To use the level of disrespect and divisive language in such a clearly prepared way just ramps up the hatred.

For him to then describe himself as a "one nation Tory" was quite extraordinary.

This is a key moment in Tory party history. Will they allow themselves to morph into the ERG/Farage party in the same way the Republicans have morphed into the Trump party in the USA or will they resist.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Those female MPs are receiving death threats every day from nutters being wound up by the rhetoric coming out of Johnson's mouth and you think that is them trying to score political points!!!!

No wonder people get angry with him when people like you cannot fathom the reality of what life must be like for MPs just trying to do their job.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Not to the ears of anyone able to rationalise no, but to an already dangerous individual who believes themselves to be a patriot whose "rights" have been stolen they can easily be extremely dangerous and enough to tip them over the edge and into action.

Politicians all need to be mindful that not everyone listening processes their words well.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Thanks.

Encapsulated in one short sentence are the reasons why Johnson's contemptuous rhetoric is so divisive.

Capturing the Brexit party voters might be in the Tory party's interests but it isn't in the country's.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The masks are really slipping now.

Yet more absolute bollox from you.

Your post is wrong in so many ways that the only thing right about it is your spelling

Brexit is a horse.

Nobody gives a s**t about the horse itself, it is a vehicle for Johnson and his hedge funds to make a vast fortune from.

But the odds-on favourite is in danger of being turned over, it does happen.

These people don't give a s**t about leaving or remaining in the EU.

It is like the political equivalent of WW1 with all the soldiers dying and the capitalists making a fortune.

Actually some people would compare Passchendale favourably with yesterday in the HOC !!!!