You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > roy out
October 25 2026 11.00pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

roy out


Page 140 of 231 < 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 >
Eaglecoops Flag CR3 09 Feb 21 2.08pm

Originally posted by NEILLO

Did you not take in the quote I posted earlier ?

Hodgson's role is about getting the best out of the players at his disposal. Some on here think he is, some don't.

Anybody on a 12 month contract is hardly in a position to be the main driver for the direction of the club - which is Parish's responsibility in any case.

I certainly agree that a gradual rebuild would have been the way to go, but as I have repeatedly said before, the club has been run through a short term lens when it comes to the first team squad. Now it's becoming a far bigger problem than it should have been.

So you basically agree with me except that you consider Hodgson more a coach than a manager, that he has no responsibility other than coaching the first team and therefore Parish is more to blame than Hodgson.

I would agree with you entirely if I thought another manager couldn’t do better than Hodgson with the current team, but as you say, some do and some don’t.

 

Eaglecoops Flag CR3 09 Feb 21 2.10pm

Originally posted by Willo

To be honest I have not heard a shred of evidence to suggest that any adverse crowd reaction would have had any bearing on the position of the manager.

Arsenal, Newcastle, Chelsea to name but a few. Crowds can sway a board quickly. Ask those who lost their seats in the Holmesdale.

 

samprior Flag Hamburg 09 Feb 21 2.10pm

Originally posted by AERO

One thing for certain, If the crowds were allowed to attend games over the last few months, Roy would have been gone by now .

I can believe this could have happened. But I feel in or out we'd still be playing pretty much the same tbh so whether we'd be any better off I don't know.

 

Den1923 Flag 09 Feb 21 2.13pm

The position of Head Coach at this club is the sole responsibility of Parish, I for one am not expecting any change for the foreseeable future as it is normal on both transfers, contracts and appointments for Parish to make these within 24 hours of the new season starting. Hence the reason he pulled himself from "Dragons Den", he could not stand having to make a decision within the timeframe set by the programme!

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 09 Feb 21 2.19pm

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

Arsenal, Newcastle, Chelsea to name but a few. Crowds can sway a board quickly. Ask those who lost their seats in the Holmesdale.

I understand the general point you are making but I am gummed to my position apropos the specific point you raised regarding Mr Hodgson and our crowds at Selhurst Park.

 

Midlands Eagle Flag 09 Feb 21 2.24pm

Originally posted by Willo


To be honest I have not heard a shred of evidence to suggest that any adverse crowd reaction would have had any bearing on the position of the manager.

What an odd statement as why would you have heard evidence unless you are trying to state that you and Parish are bosom buddies

 

AERO Flag 09 Feb 21 2.39pm

Wilo, you are very niaev if you think Crowds don't have some bearing on Chairmen/ Boards manager decisions.

 

Eaglecoops Flag CR3 09 Feb 21 2.40pm

Originally posted by Willo

I understand the general point you are making but I am gummed to my position apropos the specific point you raised regarding Mr Hodgson and our crowds at Selhurst Park.

How can your point about Hodgson and crowds at Selhurst have any meaning when it is an event that hasn’t happened yet? You are professing to know an outcome to a future event. You haven’t got the lottery numbers have you?

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 09 Feb 21 2.45pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle


What an odd statement as why would you have heard evidence unless you are trying to state that you and Parish are bosom buddies

My comments weren't intended to give any such impression.

The retinue of close friends of the 'Stately ornament' that is Steve Parish does not include 'Yours truly'.


-.-'

 

doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 09 Feb 21 2.48pm

Originally posted by AERO

One thing for certain, If the crowds were allowed to attend games over the last few months, Roy would have been gone by now .


Really? How on earth can you KNOW that? If crowds had been there, all the games would probably have been different because of the crowd effect - think how many away wins there have been!

 

Nicholas91 Flag The Democratic Republic of Kent 09 Feb 21 2.48pm

Would there really be that bad a reaction at SP to all of this?

I'm very much dissatisfied with what I have been seeing and am not shy at games but I would not be inclined to give too much grief to Roy or the players, especially whilst we're still not technically safe. I would have thought (only my opinion) it would be more murmurs and grunts as opposed to fully fledged vitriol, the type that would influence the higher ups.

Last time I can really recall any ferocity from the crowd at Selhurst was when we were 4-0 down to Sunderland.

 


Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 09 Feb 21 2.49pm

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

How can your point about Hodgson and crowds at Selhurst have any meaning when it is an event that hasn’t happened yet? You are professing to know an outcome to a future event. You haven’t got the lottery numbers have you?

My understanding was that the comments suggested that had there been crowds at Selhurst Park, the antipathy of the crowd would have swayed the 'Board' to make a decision and my response was to the contrary.

 

NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 09 Feb 21 2.53pm

Originally posted by Willo

My comments weren't intended to give any such impression.

The retinue of close friends of the 'Stately ornament' that is Steve Parish does not include 'Yours truly'.


-.-'

One of my friends is one of Steve Parish's oldest friends, they went to school together.

And Steve doesn't share any inside Palace info with him. Otherwise I could be ' In The Know ' !

 


Old, Ungifted and White

redshift Flag Toronto 09 Feb 21 2.57pm

Originally posted by EddieMac

Roy has many flaws but over the balance of his tenure he has kept us in the league with his tactics. We now have the biggest injury list in the division and if you all remember just after Xmas last year we had a worse injury crisis and this has been the case over the last few years but we always managed to pick up enough points.

Our defence last night basically picked itself so I'm not sure what else he could have done with the back 4. As far as I am concerned not 1 of that back 4 is good enough to be playing regulary.

We had 3 fit centre midfield players last night and I dont think it would have mattered which 2 he started.

I like most am bored with the football and Eze is the only player keeping me sane at the moment but Roy will not be leaving before the end of the season and a lot of you will need to brace yourselves because there is every chance he will still be here next season.

I would like him to go at the end of the year but only if it is for someone better. Our squad is in dire straits and if the wrong person comes in with no financial backing then we will be relegated.


This is exactly the way I feel so thanks for putting it so succinctly.

 


Success will lie to you but failure always tells you the truth.

PatrickA Flag London 09 Feb 21 2.58pm

To those who argue Hodgson is getting the maximum of the players at his disposal, would a Brendan Rodgers employ similar tactics with those same players?
I doubt he would be lining up 442 with Eze and PVA in wide positions in midfield.
He would not be lining up with two central midfield players in the majority of games allowing us to be continually overrun.
He would be more likely to involve Eze in a Maddison type inside forward role where he could cause maximum disruption to the opposition.He’s unlikely to ask Eze to turn into Townsend.
I doubt Rodgers would persist with one paced Luka at the base of his midfield when he has the more mobile Mcarthy, Mcarthur or Kouyate as options.
Some of our better performances have coincided with Luka’s absence.
I also doubt Rodgers would leave our strikers , whomever they may be, as isolated and starved of service as Hodgson.

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 09 Feb 21 3.01pm

Originally posted by NEILLO

One of my friends is one of Steve Parish's oldest friends, they went to school together.

And Steve doesn't share any inside Palace info with him. Otherwise I could be ' In The Know ' !

My advice,for what it is worth, is to never give the merest impression of being "In the know" on HOL as it only attracts negative comments.
-.-'

 

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 09 Feb 21 3.04pm

Originally posted by PatrickA

To those who argue Hodgson is getting the maximum of the players at his disposal, would a Brendan Rodgers employ similar tactics with those same players?
I doubt he would be lining up 442 with Eze and PVA in wide positions in midfield.
He would not be lining up with two central midfield players in the majority of games allowing us to be continually overrun.
He would be more likely to involve Eze in a Maddison type inside forward role where he could cause maximum disruption to the opposition.He’s unlikely to ask Eze to turn into Townsend.
I doubt Rodgers would persist with one paced Luka at the base of his midfield when he has the more mobile Mcarthy, Mcarthur or Kouyate as options.
Some of our better performances have coincided with Luka’s absence.
I also doubt Rodgers would leave our strikers , whomever they may be, as isolated and starved of service as Hodgson.

Rodgers would have Benteke in the side, a player he bought for Liverpool !

 

Frickin Saweet Flag South Cronx 09 Feb 21 3.14pm

Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad

Parish cannot let Roy wait until July before he makes his decision, it has to be made now, and if its a no he should go with immediate effect, how can players decide on signing a new contract without knowing, we are not going to get relegated this season, so we can replace Roy, and start building for next season

I would expect that there is common knowledge amongst the workforce that Hodgson is going (or staying) and players can set their expectations/future plans accordingly. Just because we as fan don't know for sure, doesn't mean that staff don't, as is the case with many business' when a senior person is nearing retirement. Internal comms usually precedes external comms.

 

lush1076 Flag leatherhead 09 Feb 21 3.15pm

What's sad is that currently the enjoyment level of supporting Crystal Palace has hit rock bottom. I dread watching them on TV and it's become a little embarrassing.
As fans, I think we are a thick skinned bunch. We rarely boo and we take an awful lot of s***e football. But it seems like it's gone on too long now and everyone is at the end of their tether.
I don't hate Roy and I think he's done an admirable job but it's the end of this cycle.
Fresh ideas are needed and a new direction. It's clear as day to not only us as fans but also now fans of other clubs and pundits too.

 

PatrickA Flag London 09 Feb 21 3.17pm

....and importantly would provide service to Benteke...and if he didn’t deliver the goods he’d leave him out.
Unlike Hodgson, who continues to choose woefully out of form players - presumably because they fit the ‘shape.’
Rodgers is proactive during a game as it ebbs and flows and is not averse to trying different formations to win the game.
How often does Hodgson attempt this ?
I watched the interview with him from last night and he had accepted defeat at 2-0 even though nearly a full half remained.

 

Page 140 of 231 < 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > roy out