This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
Incorrect. Andrew is giving the money to her charity. Take a look at that charity’s accounts and see what it pays her. Tax wise it’s the best way. Plus it makes all the wokes happy. Win win Maybe se can buy a new photo shop program for her PC.
|
|
|
Well that was a pricey few shags.
|
|
|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
Incorrect. Andrew is giving the money to her charity. Take a look at that charity’s accounts and see what it pays her. Tax wise it’s the best way. Plus it makes all the wokes happy. Win win A statement from their lawyers said the duke would pay an undisclosed sum to Ms Giuffre and make a "substantial donation" to Ms Giuffre's charity in support of victims' rights. As far as I can see, US law only allows ‘reasonable’ compensation to the Trustees of charities. It doesn’t seem likely they could be used as a tax vehicle. In any case any significant income has to be declared to the IRS. Tax advantage comes with donation of funds not via income. So not relevant in this case Edited by Mapletree (16 Feb 2022 8.46am)
|
|
|
Imagine thinking a bloke who paid £12m to avoid going to trial is innocent.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Imagine thinking a bloke who paid £12m to avoid going to trial is innocent.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Imagine thinking a bloke who paid £12m to avoid going to trial is innocent. Imagine thinking a bloke would have to pay £12m for a few shags. Whichever way you view it Andrew got caught hook line and tinker.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
no doubt she'll get most of the money. Andrews life is now totally changed. I'm sure he'll have plenty of cash left, but he's also got to pay his totally useless legal team too. And probably the other side as well. His mates will still have him over to stay at their country retreats, and he'll still have lots of holidays. His completely useless legal team did what he and those around him told them to do. Any sensible client would have settled an eternity ago and put it down to saving the House of Windsor and not an admission of guilt.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
A bigger example of 'privilege' from the 'woke' monarchy I doubt you could find. Out of interest, why are the monarchy woke? The word seems so versatile in it's application I struggle to keep up.
|
|
| croydon proud |
|
|---|---|
|
the grand old duke of york, he had 12 million quid,he gave it to a girl he had never met, for sex he never did!
|
|
| croydon proud |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
Imagine thinking a bloke would have to pay £12m for a few shags. Whichever way you view it Andrew got caught hook line and tinker. Hook, line and sinker indeed-caught with his pants down!
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Out of interest, why are the monarchy woke? The word seems so versatile in it's application I struggle to keep up. Support for diversity, equality, inclusion, green issues, anti racism and all the other 'woke' middle and higher class fantasies and ideologies that identify the 'woke' are all on easy display from both Charles, William and Ginger....it's a joke, the monarchy wouldn't even exist if those ideologies were followed. Even the Queen compared this generation with the war generation in terms of greatness....not woke perhaps but total bullsh1t.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
|
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Support for diversity, equality, inclusion, green issues, anti racism and all the other 'woke' middle and higher class fantasies and ideologies that identify the 'woke' are all on easy display from both Charles, William and Ginger....it's a joke, the monarchy wouldn't even exist if those ideologies were followed. Even the Queen compared this generation with the war generation in terms of greatness....not woke perhaps but total bullsh1t.
'Greatness' is a very vague term particularly when comparing generationally - what made someone great 100 years ago is very different to now. Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (16 Feb 2022 12.59pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
'Greatness' is a very vague term particularly when comparing generationally - what made someone great 100 years ago is very different to now. Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (16 Feb 2022 12.59pm) Not necessarily - "On this day (Feb 16th) Howard Carter opened the inner burial chamber of Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun's tomb and finds the sarcophagus" - wait that was in 1923, only 99 years ago, my apologies.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
I detest the royal family and actively try to avoid coverage of them, so I can't say I'm familiar with any comments on those issues. 'Greatness' is a very vague term particularly when comparing generationally - what made someone great 100 years ago is very different to now. I use to be an ardent monarchist....back in the days. While I don't think think most in that family are bad people - charity work for example. I do think they are products of their time. Over time I've come to realise that the Monarchy are just a support chorus for whatever time they exist in mimicking the culture. It's just another institution that will say anything and pretty much do anything to stay in place. Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Feb 2022 1.08pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| croydon proud |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
He would still be his royal highness and getting the tax payers helicopter to golf!
|
|
|
Originally posted by croydon proud
He would still be his royal highness and getting the tax payers helicopter to golf! Instead of using the tax payers money to get out of the charge and borrowing someone else’s helicopter to get to golf. Well, lesson learned there then.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
And 15
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Instead of using the tax payers money to get out of the charge and borrowing someone else’s helicopter to get to golf. Well, lesson learned there then. Money from his small estate, sale of his chalet in Verbier and from Queen from her duchy income. Nothing from taxpayer unless you know otherwise.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.