This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Rather an abstruse interest. Bloody hell man, this is the HOL! What is wrong with you?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Bloody hell man, this is the HOL! What is wrong with you? Kings Cross was a bit infra dig. Standards may have been low but they did exist.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Kings Cross was a bit infra dig. Standards may have been low but they did exist. Oh for goodness sake, do I have to do everthing for you
|
|
|
I refer you back to my previous post
|
|
| BlueJay |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Cpfc1861
Bit of an error from Starmer there still think he will make a better opposition then Corbyn I actually think he speaks well. Time will tell. Yes Corbin was more an an activist really. He's been that way his whole life. He was ill suited to the role of leader of the opposition and I doubt he'd have known what to do even if he had somehow won the election.
|
|
|
Makes you feel sorry for anyone who actually went there to go train spotting.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Makes you feel sorry for anyone who actually went there to go train spotting. It would be interesting to find out what they jotted down in their little note books, that's for sure.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
That is also what I heard. What I did not hear was him talking about homelessness stats. The stats for sleeping on the streets have rocketed as I pointed out. And people are sleeping in shop fronts etc far more now. Ten years ago it was more limited to areas such as Waterloo which has been mentioned. The desperation of some people to discredit Starmer is most interesting. He is feared in a way Corbyn wasn't. Better get ready for some big changes in four years' time. Ha ha yup another labour loser being replaced in four years.
|
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Ha ha yup another labour loser being replaced in four years. Whatever. He has the attention span of a three year old in desperate need of the potty. That’s why he doesn’t call himself Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson. Takes too long to say when he could be chasing the next bit of totty.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Fatherken
By the interview he did afterwards I don't think he was listening to the publican . Starmer should be held responsible for his bodyguards behaviour and the bodyguard done for assault . I'm not saying that Starmer or his bodyguard should be charged but it was not a good look seeing a publican pushed out of the way and then restrained. Possibly they did not realise he was the owner, still the optics will not be in his favour. Update Edited by Badger11 (19 Apr 2021 5.38pm)
One more point |
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Fatherken
By the interview he did afterwards I don't think he was listening to the publican . Starmer should be held responsible for his bodyguards behaviour and the bodyguard done for assault . It seems like there was some disparity in what the Landlord said and what Starmer said the Landlord said. I thought he was trying to say that as a lifelong Labour voter he had been let down by a party in the grip of idiots that had failed to win an election leaving the gates wide open for the Tories. Unfortunately, the majority of the vocal Labour support just blame those Nasty/Racist/Fascist/Corrupt (insert overused buzz word here until it's meaningless) Tory Scum. They have undertaken no self refection and don't realise that the Tories won because they failed to but forward a compelling manifesto.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Very disappointed in him. No impact, no policies, no ideals. Just can't bring himself to have a go at the tories. And his judgement, how could he possibly whip the labour party to support Johnson's deal? Now, with it falling apart, he has no position as he supported it. Yet he leads the opposition. Very odd. There's always Khan.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| BlueJay |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Ooops Starmer gets an earful There is something disturbing when the landlord is prevented from throwing him out of his own pub by Starmer's security. Yes not a good look for security. I guess he wasn't quite sure what was going on and took a better safe than sorry approach. Nice of the bloke to do his best Peggy Mitchell impression though right down to the hairstyle. Gerrrout of my pub!
|
|
| Tom-the-eagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Very disappointed in him. No impact, no policies, no ideals. Just can't bring himself to have a go at the tories. And his judgement, how could he possibly whip the labour party to support Johnson's deal? Now, with it falling apart, he has no position as he supported it. Yet he leads the opposition. Very odd. It’s funny, I’m generally, (although not exclusively) Right leaning, however I like the fact he doesn’t constantly attack the government. To me it comes across quite classy. Whilst not my cup of tea, I think he’s fairly credible. Edited by Tom-the-eagle (19 Apr 2021 7.27pm)
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Very disappointed in him. No impact, no policies, no ideals. Just can't bring himself to have a go at the tories. And his judgement, how could he possibly whip the labour party to support Johnson's deal? Now, with it falling apart, he has no position as he supported it. Yet he leads the opposition. Very odd. So take brexit out of it and what should he oppose or propose?
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Very disappointed in him. No impact, no policies, no ideals. Just can't bring himself to have a go at the tories. And his judgement, how could he possibly whip the labour party to support Johnson's deal? Now, with it falling apart, he has no position as he supported it. Yet he leads the opposition. Very odd.
Following Palace since 25 Feb 1978 |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.