You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sir Keir Starmer
November 13 2026 7.37am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Sir Keir Starmer


Page 23 of 39 < 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 >
orpingtoneagle Flag Orpington 21 Apr 21 11.36am

I think it is very hard to be in opposition at the current time as the pandemic has to a great extent taken away business as usual and stifled debate across all parties.

Is he the best man for the job? Maybe now is not a fair time to judge anyone but we are stuck with what we have got. Who knows if/when we will return to business as usual of what even usual looks like.

 

Jacey Flag 21 Apr 21 11.48am

Originally posted by orpingtoneagle

I think it is very hard to be in opposition at the current time as the pandemic has to a great extent taken away business as usual and stifled debate across all parties.

Is he the best man for the job? Maybe now is not a fair time to judge anyone but we are stuck with what we have got. Who knows if/when we will return to business as usual of what even usual looks like.

Poor old Keir should give up and go back to being a very effective barrister.
Surrounded by non entities in his shadow cabinet,particularly dreary,dopey people like Dodds,education secretary and Ashworth who all underwent charisma bypass surgery,he was sadly,doomed from the start.

 

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 21 Apr 21 11.56am

We will certainly not get a green revolution and action on climate change from Westminster.

Mote like can-kicking and tory cronyism, with lack-lustre opposition.

Like others I can't see the relevance of this institution anymore.

My voting leaflet on the London election has plenty of choice from candidates eager to improve London's lot.

They seem relevant to London, even the daft ones.

 

jeeagles Flag 21 Apr 21 12.13pm

Originally posted by Jacey
Poor old Keir should give up and go back to being a very effective barrister.
Surrounded by non entities in his shadow cabinet,particularly dreary,dopey people like Dodds,education secretary and Ashworth who all underwent charisma bypass surgery,he was sadly,doomed from the start.

Of the three Labour leaders that have won elections since the war. Two were barristers.

On matters of conscious he's pretty good. It just seems like Labour have no policy. Their core supporter base has shifted since Momentum took control of the party and the sole intention is to have a throwback socialist labour party who do nothing more than call all conservative voters scum.

Starmer's main battle coming up isn't to win an election, he needs to straighten out the party. Corbyn's leadership was akin to Farrage taking control of the Tories and infiltrating it with moronic UKIPpers that have chased out all the talent.

Personally, I think what traditional Labour voters want to see is a party that offers pragmatic ideas to support those less well off, policy to match changing technology and economic conditions, a hard line on crime, acceptance of the referendum decision (even reluctantly), and less of this spiteful ideology which seems to be directed at the rich but helps no one.

It seems the only solution at the moment is to set up a new party, as Labour won't be escaping the clutches of the lunatics any time soon.

Lib Dem are still failing to fill the gap as they just seem too soft on everything, always trying to be a middle man and never being decisive.

 

silvertop Flag Portishead 21 Apr 21 1.47pm

Originally posted by Willo

The Lib Dems gained the seat from the Conservatives in 2017 and held on to it in 2019.
Us Conservatives held the seat from the 1930s until 1992. Chris Patten who had been MP for several years lost his seat to the Lib Dem candidate in the 1992 General Election.


Edited by Willo (21 Apr 2021 11.40am)

Not a bielection for the MP seat Willo it's local elections.

 

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 21 Apr 21 11.57pm

The " traditional" Labour voter is what Gordon Brown came up against in Rochdale.

The Momentum/Corbynista clique were arrogant to believe the masses would blindly follow their student politics.

The current Government is a centrist as is likely for a while and has hoovered up the North.

I remain quite happy to see the Labour Party self combusting over the next few years leading up to the next General Election.

I hope Labour continue to have rejoining the EU as a front and centre policy as that is a 60+ seat head start to the Conservatives.

Originally posted by jeeagles

Of the three Labour leaders that have won elections since the war. Two were barristers.

On matters of conscious he's pretty good. It just seems like Labour have no policy. Their core supporter base has shifted since Momentum took control of the party and the sole intention is to have a throwback socialist labour party who do nothing more than call all conservative voters scum.

Starmer's main battle coming up isn't to win an election, he needs to straighten out the party. Corbyn's leadership was akin to Farrage taking control of the Tories and infiltrating it with moronic UKIPpers that have chased out all the talent.

Personally, I think what traditional Labour voters want to see is a party that offers pragmatic ideas to support those less well off, policy to match changing technology and economic conditions, a hard line on crime, acceptance of the referendum decision (even reluctantly), and less of this spiteful ideology which seems to be directed at the rich but helps no one.

It seems the only solution at the moment is to set up a new party, as Labour won't be escaping the clutches of the lunatics any time soon.

Lib Dem are still failing to fill the gap as they just seem too soft on everything, always trying to be a middle man and never being decisive.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

jeeagles Flag 22 Apr 21 10.20am

Originally posted by HKOwen
The " traditional" Labour voter is what Gordon Brown came up against in Rochdale.

I'm not sure she is a fair representation of all Labour voters. There's probably plenty of died in the wool Tories who are just as bigoted, but I see the sterotype and get your point.

What I was getting at was the voters that allowed Tony Blair to win 3 landslide GE victories. The will to vote for a left leaning party exists amongst the British people, it's just that no one trusts them at the moment and they aren't coming up with anything anyone wants.

They are a very centrist Tory government and the left hate being told that. These aren't the Thatcherite Tories of the past, nor the sleaze of the Major years.

Listening to todays news, it makes you wonder if Labour would call for an inquiry into the procurement of Spitfires and Lee Enfield's. I've got a vision of Captian Mainwaring in the first episode of Dad's army being told that he can't have any rifles because Churchill got them from his mates rather than through following procurement rules.

It seems like all Dyson asked for assurances his staff wont fall foul of the 90 day residency test, which can be waivered in exceptional circumstances. Unless there's something I'm unaware of, he hasn't broken any tax rules at all.

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 22 Apr 21 10.30am

Originally posted by jeeagles

I'm not sure she is a fair representation of all Labour voters. There's probably plenty of died in the wool Tories who are just as bigoted, but I see the sterotype and get your point.

What I was getting at was the voters that allowed Tony Blair to win 3 landslide GE victories. The will to vote for a left leaning party exists amongst the British people, it's just that no one trusts them at the moment and they aren't coming up with anything anyone wants.

They are a very centrist Tory government and the left hate being told that. These aren't the Thatcherite Tories of the past, nor the sleaze of the Major years.

Listening to todays news, it makes you wonder if Labour would call for an inquiry into the procurement of Spitfires and Lee Enfield's. I've got a vision of Captian Mainwaring in the first episode of Dad's army being told that he can't have any rifles because Churchill got them from his mates rather than through following procurement rules.

It seems like all Dyson asked for assurances his staff wont fall foul of the 90 day residency test, which can be waivered in exceptional circumstances. Unless there's something I'm unaware of, he hasn't broken any tax rules at all.


Exactly Dyson simply saying that if his people need to come to the UK to finish work on these ventilators will they get screwed by the tax man Boris of course said no which was perfectly reasonable.

As a comparison it's like the driver who pulls into a bus lane to let the ambulance through and then gets a ticket.

Plenty of other Tory sleaze around nothing to see here.

Edited by Badger11 (22 Apr 2021 10.43am)

Edited by Badger11 (22 Apr 2021 10.45am)

 


One more point

Jacey Flag 22 Apr 21 10.39am

Keir's popularity is on the wane after a mixed performance in his first year of leadership,not helped by his choice of such a dreary bunch of no hoper shadow cabinet.
Now desperate to discredit Boris at all costs to address his rapid decline in fortunes.

 

silvertop Flag Portishead 22 Apr 21 10.46am

Originally posted by Badger11


Exactly Dyson simply saying that if his people need to come to the UK to finish work on these ventilators will they get screwed by the tax man Boris of course said know which was perfectly reasonable.

As a comparison it's like the driver who pulls into a bus lane to let the ambulance through and then gets a ticket.

Plenty of other Tory sleaze around nothing to see here.

Edited by Badger11 (22 Apr 2021 10.31am)

No. It is down to procedure. There are ways of doing things and asking your mate the chief executive of the country to sort it on the QT is not the way.

Yeah yeah, red tape, bureaucracy cut through in a crisis etc. However, believe it or not, rules are there not just to make work for civil servants, but to operate as checks and balances against abuse.

Thus, in this case the PM's protestations that he was acting in the nation's best interests is fair. However, as the top of the heap, he cannot side-step important rules designed to prevent corruption. If you want to inspire confidence in an organization, you don't just need to do right you need to be seen and perceived as doing right. On this occasion, he did not. Thus, the attacks are proportionate and justified.

Public confidence has been eroded, albeit not much; and the story will be chip wrap in a week.

 

silvertop Flag Portishead 22 Apr 21 10.52am

Originally posted by Jacey

Keir's popularity is on the wane after a mixed performance in his first year of leadership,not helped by his choice of such a dreary bunch of no hoper shadow cabinet.
Now desperate to discredit Boris at all costs to address his rapid decline in fortunes.

You may not be a labour voter (neither am I) and would happily see Starmer's decline, but there are good reasons why he has been anonymous in his first year. And this current attack is not an attempt to reverse his decline in popularity, it is him doing his job.

I will say one thing though. It is testament to the powerful Tory PR machine that any public appearance of BJ is very restricted and controlled and, so far, largely gaff free. For that to happen for a bloke like him, he must be kept on a very tight reign indeed. Thus, not much for poor Keir to sink his teeth into.

Yet.

 

jeeagles Flag 22 Apr 21 12.33pm

Originally posted by silvertop
No. It is down to procedure. There are ways of doing things and asking your mate the chief executive of the country to sort it on the QT is not the way.

Yeah yeah, red tape, bureaucracy cut through in a crisis etc. However, believe it or not, rules are there not just to make work for civil servants, but to operate as checks and balances against abuse.

Thus, in this case the PM's protestations that he was acting in the nation's best interests is fair. However, as the top of the heap, he cannot side-step important rules designed to prevent corruption. If you want to inspire confidence in an organization, you don't just need to do right you need to be seen and perceived as doing right. On this occasion, he did not. Thus, the attacks are proportionate and justified.

Public confidence has been eroded, albeit not much; and the story will be chip wrap in a week.

What tax rule do you think they are being accused of breaking?

Everyone's claiming they've broken a rule - but they don't know what rule has been broken, they simply haven't done anything wrong here.

In a sporting analogy, it's like claiming one side has cheated for asking a ref to clarify the rules.

 

silvertop Flag Portishead 22 Apr 21 2.11pm

Originally posted by jeeagles

What tax rule do you think they are being accused of breaking?

Everyone's claiming they've broken a rule - but they don't know what rule has been broken, they simply haven't done anything wrong here.

In a sporting analogy, it's like claiming one side has cheated for asking a ref to clarify the rules.

I am not saying any tax rules were broken. I am saying you don't give your mate an assurance that he will be free feom tax implications as PM even if he won't be. Not in the midst of a cronyism scandal anyway.

Dyson should have gone to his own advisers like.everyone else.

And what if tax roles were broken? Dyson would have his personal assurance from his friend that he can side step rhe Rules that everyone else has to.follow.


It's not about breaking rule its about perception and public confidence in a system of rules.that bind us all

 

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 22 Apr 21 3.12pm

Starmer - totally seduced by the soft lights, the place reserved for an opposition leader, the tory deference that if there has to be one, let him be one of us.

But that is all it is, Sir Keir, and your job is to lead the opposition in the country to the government.

No discernible opposition to anything tory, even when presented with innumerable own goals, would rather not even vote against them.

Where does he stand on the climate emergency, the 'green revolution', the pandemic even, the deep seated tory corruption?

The failure to oppose Johnson's deal, leaving him without a credible position, as broken as it is?

Starmer lends credence to the view, widely held, that Westminster is totally unsuited and actually the root of our many problems.

What would be the point of electing him we will still be pouring s**t into rivers.


 

jeeagles Flag 22 Apr 21 3.21pm

Originally posted by silvertop

I am not saying any tax rules were broken. I am saying you don't give your mate an assurance that he will be free feom tax implications as PM even if he won't be. Not in the midst of a cronyism scandal anyway.

Dyson should have gone to his own advisers like.everyone else.

And what if tax roles were broken? Dyson would have his personal assurance from his friend that he can side step rhe Rules that everyone else has to.follow.

It's not about breaking rule its about perception and public confidence in a system of rules.that bind us all

1) In that time delivery would have been delayed and people could have died unnecessarily.

2) I doubt they are mates. The UK government was securing services from Dyson PLC. The government was acting as the client and Dyson was seeking clarification that this would not count towards the 90day residency rule for some of his staff as it was an emergency and the exceptional circumstances should kick in. The head of the client organisation was assisting in expediting the execution of the contract.

It takes someone with particular clout from government to go to a world leader in manufacturing to ask them to turn all their R&D effort away from its main business, hault its lucrative vacuum manufacturing process and direct its huge capability towards something its never made before on speculation. A cold call contact from a mediocre civil servant would have not gained the same result.

Edited by jeeagles (22 Apr 2021 3.22pm)

 

Matov Flag 22 Apr 21 9.43pm

The opposition attacking the Government over this Dyson issue is what it is meant to be doing. I am all for slagging off Starmer but this is what his job actually is.

Actual real politics.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Henry of Peckham Flag Eton Mess 22 Apr 21 11.25pm

Originally posted by Jacey

Keir's popularity is on the wane after a mixed performance in his first year of leadership,not helped by his choice of such a dreary bunch of no hoper shadow cabinet.
Now desperate to discredit Boris at all costs to address his rapid decline in fortunes.

He offers nothing new and from what I've observed he just reacts to what his advisors reckon is public opinion. Why not innovate and lead on something for a change? His Shadow Cabinet is exactly what's written on the tin ... in the shadows! A dreary bunch of nobodies.

 


Denial is not just a river in Egypt

BlueJay Flag UK 22 Apr 21 11.29pm

A dirty business. With this Dyson stuff and those mega bucks contracts that were handed out to politicians mates by the dozen we really ought to appreciate it for what it is. I know we've all become cynical about politicans or imagine that 'the other lot would do the same', but really we should applaud all and any efforts to shine a light on this because it shows individuals up for who they are and what they're all about. You don't get better people in place by sneering at underdog opposition, or by letting our dislike of them excuse this entitled crap.

 

BlueJay Flag UK 22 Apr 21 11.32pm

Originally posted by Henry of Peckham

He offers nothing new and from what I've observed he just reacts to what his advisors reckon is public opinion. Why not innovate and lead on something for a change? His Shadow Cabinet is exactly what's written on the tin ... in the shadows! A dreary bunch of nobodies.

He's definitely been a bit too ingratiating with the opposition. To be honest within reason I think that implies a balanced outlook, but in either party that really does you no favours with your base. It's a tricky balance of looking for 'everyman' appeal, while also appealing to those wedded to your party. I think he's a decent man, certainly compared to Boris, but I'm not sure that he's PM material. It's so far from an election who knows though.

 

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 23 Apr 21 6.04am

James Dyson's family pay well over 100 million pounds in UK tax, more from his corporate ventures. It is completely wrong to infer he does not pay tax.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Page 23 of 39 < 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Sir Keir Starmer