This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by orpingtoneagle
I think it is very hard to be in opposition at the current time as the pandemic has to a great extent taken away business as usual and stifled debate across all parties. Is he the best man for the job? Maybe now is not a fair time to judge anyone but we are stuck with what we have got. Who knows if/when we will return to business as usual of what even usual looks like. Poor old Keir should give up and go back to being a very effective barrister.
|
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jacey
Poor old Keir should give up and go back to being a very effective barrister. Surrounded by non entities in his shadow cabinet,particularly dreary,dopey people like Dodds,education secretary and Ashworth who all underwent charisma bypass surgery,he was sadly,doomed from the start. Of the three Labour leaders that have won elections since the war. Two were barristers. On matters of conscious he's pretty good. It just seems like Labour have no policy. Their core supporter base has shifted since Momentum took control of the party and the sole intention is to have a throwback socialist labour party who do nothing more than call all conservative voters scum. Starmer's main battle coming up isn't to win an election, he needs to straighten out the party. Corbyn's leadership was akin to Farrage taking control of the Tories and infiltrating it with moronic UKIPpers that have chased out all the talent. Personally, I think what traditional Labour voters want to see is a party that offers pragmatic ideas to support those less well off, policy to match changing technology and economic conditions, a hard line on crime, acceptance of the referendum decision (even reluctantly), and less of this spiteful ideology which seems to be directed at the rich but helps no one. It seems the only solution at the moment is to set up a new party, as Labour won't be escaping the clutches of the lunatics any time soon. Lib Dem are still failing to fill the gap as they just seem too soft on everything, always trying to be a middle man and never being decisive.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
The Lib Dems gained the seat from the Conservatives in 2017 and held on to it in 2019.
Not a bielection for the MP seat Willo it's local elections.
|
|
|
The " traditional" Labour voter is what Gordon Brown came up against in Rochdale. The Momentum/Corbynista clique were arrogant to believe the masses would blindly follow their student politics. The current Government is a centrist as is likely for a while and has hoovered up the North. I remain quite happy to see the Labour Party self combusting over the next few years leading up to the next General Election. I hope Labour continue to have rejoining the EU as a front and centre policy as that is a 60+ seat head start to the Conservatives. Originally posted by jeeagles
Of the three Labour leaders that have won elections since the war. Two were barristers. On matters of conscious he's pretty good. It just seems like Labour have no policy. Their core supporter base has shifted since Momentum took control of the party and the sole intention is to have a throwback socialist labour party who do nothing more than call all conservative voters scum. Starmer's main battle coming up isn't to win an election, he needs to straighten out the party. Corbyn's leadership was akin to Farrage taking control of the Tories and infiltrating it with moronic UKIPpers that have chased out all the talent. Personally, I think what traditional Labour voters want to see is a party that offers pragmatic ideas to support those less well off, policy to match changing technology and economic conditions, a hard line on crime, acceptance of the referendum decision (even reluctantly), and less of this spiteful ideology which seems to be directed at the rich but helps no one. It seems the only solution at the moment is to set up a new party, as Labour won't be escaping the clutches of the lunatics any time soon. Lib Dem are still failing to fill the gap as they just seem too soft on everything, always trying to be a middle man and never being decisive.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
The " traditional" Labour voter is what Gordon Brown came up against in Rochdale. I'm not sure she is a fair representation of all Labour voters. There's probably plenty of died in the wool Tories who are just as bigoted, but I see the sterotype and get your point. What I was getting at was the voters that allowed Tony Blair to win 3 landslide GE victories. The will to vote for a left leaning party exists amongst the British people, it's just that no one trusts them at the moment and they aren't coming up with anything anyone wants. They are a very centrist Tory government and the left hate being told that. These aren't the Thatcherite Tories of the past, nor the sleaze of the Major years. Listening to todays news, it makes you wonder if Labour would call for an inquiry into the procurement of Spitfires and Lee Enfield's. I've got a vision of Captian Mainwaring in the first episode of Dad's army being told that he can't have any rifles because Churchill got them from his mates rather than through following procurement rules. It seems like all Dyson asked for assurances his staff wont fall foul of the 90 day residency test, which can be waivered in exceptional circumstances. Unless there's something I'm unaware of, he hasn't broken any tax rules at all.
|
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
I'm not sure she is a fair representation of all Labour voters. There's probably plenty of died in the wool Tories who are just as bigoted, but I see the sterotype and get your point. What I was getting at was the voters that allowed Tony Blair to win 3 landslide GE victories. The will to vote for a left leaning party exists amongst the British people, it's just that no one trusts them at the moment and they aren't coming up with anything anyone wants. They are a very centrist Tory government and the left hate being told that. These aren't the Thatcherite Tories of the past, nor the sleaze of the Major years. Listening to todays news, it makes you wonder if Labour would call for an inquiry into the procurement of Spitfires and Lee Enfield's. I've got a vision of Captian Mainwaring in the first episode of Dad's army being told that he can't have any rifles because Churchill got them from his mates rather than through following procurement rules. It seems like all Dyson asked for assurances his staff wont fall foul of the 90 day residency test, which can be waivered in exceptional circumstances. Unless there's something I'm unaware of, he hasn't broken any tax rules at all. Exactly Dyson simply saying that if his people need to come to the UK to finish work on these ventilators will they get screwed by the tax man Boris of course said no which was perfectly reasonable. As a comparison it's like the driver who pulls into a bus lane to let the ambulance through and then gets a ticket. Plenty of other Tory sleaze around nothing to see here. Edited by Badger11 (22 Apr 2021 10.43am) Edited by Badger11 (22 Apr 2021 10.45am)
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Exactly Dyson simply saying that if his people need to come to the UK to finish work on these ventilators will they get screwed by the tax man Boris of course said know which was perfectly reasonable. As a comparison it's like the driver who pulls into a bus lane to let the ambulance through and then gets a ticket. Plenty of other Tory sleaze around nothing to see here. Edited by Badger11 (22 Apr 2021 10.31am) No. It is down to procedure. There are ways of doing things and asking your mate the chief executive of the country to sort it on the QT is not the way. Yeah yeah, red tape, bureaucracy cut through in a crisis etc. However, believe it or not, rules are there not just to make work for civil servants, but to operate as checks and balances against abuse. Thus, in this case the PM's protestations that he was acting in the nation's best interests is fair. However, as the top of the heap, he cannot side-step important rules designed to prevent corruption. If you want to inspire confidence in an organization, you don't just need to do right you need to be seen and perceived as doing right. On this occasion, he did not. Thus, the attacks are proportionate and justified. Public confidence has been eroded, albeit not much; and the story will be chip wrap in a week.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Jacey
Keir's popularity is on the wane after a mixed performance in his first year of leadership,not helped by his choice of such a dreary bunch of no hoper shadow cabinet. You may not be a labour voter (neither am I) and would happily see Starmer's decline, but there are good reasons why he has been anonymous in his first year. And this current attack is not an attempt to reverse his decline in popularity, it is him doing his job. I will say one thing though. It is testament to the powerful Tory PR machine that any public appearance of BJ is very restricted and controlled and, so far, largely gaff free. For that to happen for a bloke like him, he must be kept on a very tight reign indeed. Thus, not much for poor Keir to sink his teeth into. Yet.
|
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
No. It is down to procedure. There are ways of doing things and asking your mate the chief executive of the country to sort it on the QT is not the way. Yeah yeah, red tape, bureaucracy cut through in a crisis etc. However, believe it or not, rules are there not just to make work for civil servants, but to operate as checks and balances against abuse. Thus, in this case the PM's protestations that he was acting in the nation's best interests is fair. However, as the top of the heap, he cannot side-step important rules designed to prevent corruption. If you want to inspire confidence in an organization, you don't just need to do right you need to be seen and perceived as doing right. On this occasion, he did not. Thus, the attacks are proportionate and justified. Public confidence has been eroded, albeit not much; and the story will be chip wrap in a week. What tax rule do you think they are being accused of breaking? Everyone's claiming they've broken a rule - but they don't know what rule has been broken, they simply haven't done anything wrong here. In a sporting analogy, it's like claiming one side has cheated for asking a ref to clarify the rules.
|
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
What tax rule do you think they are being accused of breaking? Everyone's claiming they've broken a rule - but they don't know what rule has been broken, they simply haven't done anything wrong here. In a sporting analogy, it's like claiming one side has cheated for asking a ref to clarify the rules. I am not saying any tax rules were broken. I am saying you don't give your mate an assurance that he will be free feom tax implications as PM even if he won't be. Not in the midst of a cronyism scandal anyway. Dyson should have gone to his own advisers like.everyone else. And what if tax roles were broken? Dyson would have his personal assurance from his friend that he can side step rhe Rules that everyone else has to.follow.
|
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by silvertop
I am not saying any tax rules were broken. I am saying you don't give your mate an assurance that he will be free feom tax implications as PM even if he won't be. Not in the midst of a cronyism scandal anyway. Dyson should have gone to his own advisers like.everyone else. And what if tax roles were broken? Dyson would have his personal assurance from his friend that he can side step rhe Rules that everyone else has to.follow. It's not about breaking rule its about perception and public confidence in a system of rules.that bind us all 1) In that time delivery would have been delayed and people could have died unnecessarily. 2) I doubt they are mates. The UK government was securing services from Dyson PLC. The government was acting as the client and Dyson was seeking clarification that this would not count towards the 90day residency rule for some of his staff as it was an emergency and the exceptional circumstances should kick in. The head of the client organisation was assisting in expediting the execution of the contract. It takes someone with particular clout from government to go to a world leader in manufacturing to ask them to turn all their R&D effort away from its main business, hault its lucrative vacuum manufacturing process and direct its huge capability towards something its never made before on speculation. A cold call contact from a mediocre civil servant would have not gained the same result. Edited by jeeagles (22 Apr 2021 3.22pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Jacey
Keir's popularity is on the wane after a mixed performance in his first year of leadership,not helped by his choice of such a dreary bunch of no hoper shadow cabinet. He offers nothing new and from what I've observed he just reacts to what his advisors reckon is public opinion. Why not innovate and lead on something for a change? His Shadow Cabinet is exactly what's written on the tin ... in the shadows! A dreary bunch of nobodies.
Denial is not just a river in Egypt |
|
| BlueJay |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Henry of Peckham
He offers nothing new and from what I've observed he just reacts to what his advisors reckon is public opinion. Why not innovate and lead on something for a change? His Shadow Cabinet is exactly what's written on the tin ... in the shadows! A dreary bunch of nobodies. He's definitely been a bit too ingratiating with the opposition. To be honest within reason I think that implies a balanced outlook, but in either party that really does you no favours with your base. It's a tricky balance of looking for 'everyman' appeal, while also appealing to those wedded to your party. I think he's a decent man, certainly compared to Boris, but I'm not sure that he's PM material. It's so far from an election who knows though.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.