You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 8 2026 6.46pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)


Page 232 of 261 < 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 >
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Mar 24 2.28pm

Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines

You obviously haven’t been aware of the mis-gendering ‘crime’ that’s currently in vogue. Man wants to be addressed as a woman; others have to abide by that request…

Much more than you could possibly imagine but it’s unrelated to the issue being discussed

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Mar 24 2.52pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

We both agree that identity politics is not desirable, nor rigid racial descriptions.

The problem is that some of us think that surrendering our own identity and encouraging self hate and guilt related to so called 'privilege' and history is a way to cure all these ills.

It 100% is not.

We have to recognise the tribalism and self interest inherent in all human beings, and acknowledge that the 10% of Europeans on this planet will be undermined and swept away unless we stop fretting about everyone else's needs and ambitions and focus on our own.

No other racial, cultural or religious group on Earth spends so much time trying to destroy itself.

We do agree about your first paragraph.

I do not though think as you suggest in the second.I see no reason at all for us to carry the actions of our forefathers on our shoulders unless we perpetuate them. Some of them us try hard not to. Others less so. There is nothing wrong in celebrating and treasuring our history, but it also wise and honourable to acknowledge mistakes that can only now be recognised with the benefit of experience and hindsight.

There is no reason at all why the people, traditions and culture of Europe will be swept away. The mix of people who identify themselves as European will go on evolving just as it always has. In other parts of the world where Europeans have settled there will be a similar process and new cultures will emerge which blend a variety of elements. It’s really nothing new

The only ones fretting about are the likes of you

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 17 Mar 24 5.03pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

We do agree about your first paragraph.

I do not though think as you suggest in the second.I see no reason at all for us to carry the actions of our forefathers on our shoulders unless we perpetuate them. Some of them us try hard not to. Others less so. There is nothing wrong in celebrating and treasuring our history, but it also wise and honourable to acknowledge mistakes that can only now be recognised with the benefit of experience and hindsight.

There is no reason at all why the people, traditions and culture of Europe will be swept away. The mix of people who identify themselves as European will go on evolving just as it always has. In other parts of the world where Europeans have settled there will be a similar process and new cultures will emerge which blend a variety of elements. It’s really nothing new

The only ones fretting about are the likes of you

By evolve you mean outbred and diluted out of existence like the Neanderthal.

The only blend you get when you slowly mix 90% and 10% is a whole lot of the 90%.
It really doesn't require a masters in genetics or a membership to a far right wing party to accept this simple reality.

Only those attempting to obfuscate will deny it in favour of smears, illogical rhetoric with talk of 'evolution'.

 

Spiderman Flag Horsham 17 Mar 24 7.35pm

Great British fish and chips not acceptable

[Link]

 

Badger11 Flag Beckenham 17 Mar 24 8.03pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

Great British fish and chips not acceptable

[Link]

What do you expect it's Greenwich council.

 


One more point

PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 17 Mar 24 8.19pm

Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines

You obviously haven’t been aware of the mis-gendering ‘crime’ that’s currently in vogue. Man wants to be addressed as a woman; others have to abide by that request…

Enoch Burke has already done a punitively long stretch in Prison. Contempt of Court.....connected to a row about his/her/they.

In the 1984 of Big Brother, it was a crime to speak the truth.

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Behind Enemy Lines Flag Sussex 17 Mar 24 8.36pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

Great British fish and chips not acceptable

[Link]

Probably not approved via the Council’s planning committee. He should have just projected the message onto the Houses of Parliament; no need for any pesky procedure…

 


hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Mar 24 10.27pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

By evolve you mean outbred and diluted out of existence like the Neanderthal.

The only blend you get when you slowly mix 90% and 10% is a whole lot of the 90%.
It really doesn't require a masters in genetics or a membership to a far right wing party to accept this simple reality.

Only those attempting to obfuscate will deny it in favour of smears, illogical rhetoric with talk of 'evolution'.

Your blind acceptance of the “Great Replacement Theory” is overwhelming the actual facts. So let’s look at those two claims.

Firstly, all the people who are living here now and in the future are Homo sapiens. The Neanderthals were not. They were eventually dominated by us because we were superior in minor, but important ways.

Now let’s look at the numbers. In the year to June 2022 around 15% of us weren’t born here. However that included around 5% from the EU countries, people I assume you aren’t concerned about. So around 10% of concern and 90% of no concern. The complete reverse of your scenario described above.

Your hypothesis depends on the assumption that all trends go in straight lines, but that has never been true and won’t be in the future. More sophisticated predictions are required and you can find them here:-

[Link]

I urge you to read this in full. Of particular relevance when assessing the validity of your claims is this:-

“ONS figures show that in 2021, 28.8% of births in the UK were to non-UK born mothers. This is higher than the share of non-UK born people in the UK population, primarily because non-UK born women are more likely to be of childbearing age. The estimated total fertility rate of foreign-born women living in the UK has declined over the past 10 years to just below ‘replacement rate’, and stood at 2.03 in 2021. This compared to 1.54 for UK-born women. Note that these figures include non-UK born women regardless of how long they have lived in the UK.”

So as people settle they adjust and adopt similar patterns to the UK born. With the overall numbers forecasted to decline there is no risk at all of the situation you foresee actually happening. It’s simply scaremongering.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Mar 24 10.39pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

You heard it here first folks.

White people are a 'right wing idea'.

Not the simple term but the extension placed upon it by those who claim there is a “white” race of European origin. The people who do this tend to also hold extreme right wing ideas.

They, of course, deny and obfuscate, as some of the associations have historical unpleasantness.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 17 Mar 24 11.26pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Wisbech has been wasting our time since he joined this site.

He enjoys it.

However, he has sunk to a new level of delusion recently.

I find him useful. He represents everything I hate about hypocritical, narcissistic liberals.

He strengthens my resolve and reminds me who the enemy really is.

I have stopped engaging with him directly.

I find the know it all attitude and delusions of adequacy simply unbearable, others may have entirely different views.


I have no problem with everyone having an opinion but his arrogance and faux superiority complex plus his " my opinions are facts " attitude is not worth engaging with.

I can see the point you make about having a degree of use, albeit a small one

Refer to my signature about RDD
Edited by HKOwen (18 Mar 2024 12.14am)

Edited by HKOwen (18 Mar 2024 12.20am)

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

The Dolphin Flag 18 Mar 24 4.53am

This is meant to be about the BBC?

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 18 Mar 24 8.22am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Your blind acceptance of the “Great Replacement Theory” is overwhelming the actual facts. So let’s look at those two claims.

Firstly, all the people who are living here now and in the future are Homo sapiens. The Neanderthals were not. They were eventually dominated by us because we were superior in minor, but important ways.

Now let’s look at the numbers. In the year to June 2022 around 15% of us weren’t born here. However that included around 5% from the EU countries, people I assume you aren’t concerned about. So around 10% of concern and 90% of no concern. The complete reverse of your scenario described above.

Your hypothesis depends on the assumption that all trends go in straight lines, but that has never been true and won’t be in the future. More sophisticated predictions are required and you can find them here:-

[Link]

I urge you to read this in full. Of particular relevance when assessing the validity of your claims is this:-

“ONS figures show that in 2021, 28.8% of births in the UK were to non-UK born mothers. This is higher than the share of non-UK born people in the UK population, primarily because non-UK born women are more likely to be of childbearing age. The estimated total fertility rate of foreign-born women living in the UK has declined over the past 10 years to just below ‘replacement rate’, and stood at 2.03 in 2021. This compared to 1.54 for UK-born women. Note that these figures include non-UK born women regardless of how long they have lived in the UK.”

So as people settle they adjust and adopt similar patterns to the UK born. With the overall numbers forecasted to decline there is no risk at all of the situation you foresee actually happening. It’s simply scaremongering.

This is a great post... Because it displays your incredible ignorance.

First. Neanderthals disappeared because there were far fewer of them than modern humans. We still carry a few percent of their genes. They were absorbed. Evidence suggests that they were sophisticated and actually had bigger brains than us. There is no evidence that they were 'dominated' other than in numbers.

Fact. The proportion of migrants has risen rapidly in the past 50 years.
Fact. Immigration is increasing.
Fact. First generation migrants tend to have more children than the British average. Even if the birth rate declines through subsequent generations, the population is continuously refreshed by new arrivals with higher birth rates.

Conclusion. The only way to avoid becoming a minority and eventually non existent is to halt mass migration. Your assertion relies on a total reversal of current policy and a deluded belief that a desire to migrate to Europe will decline.

Can you point to any evidence that this is likely to happen?

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 18 Mar 24 8.25am

Originally posted by The Dolphin

This is meant to be about the BBC?

We changed the channel.

 

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 18 Mar 24 8.48am

Originally posted by HKOwen

I have stopped engaging with him directly.

I find the know it all attitude and delusions of adequacy simply unbearable, others may have entirely different views.


I have no problem with everyone having an opinion but his arrogance and faux superiority complex plus his " my opinions are facts " attitude is not worth engaging with.

I can see the point you make about having a degree of use, albeit a small one

Refer to my signature about RDD
Edited by HKOwen (18 Mar 2024 12.14am)

Edited by HKOwen (18 Mar 2024 12.20am)

I welcome you not responding to me directly. Continuous rudeness is boring. You are though obsessed with some kind of irrational dislike of me, which is an odd phenomenon. It won't though stop me from commenting on some of the things you claim.

There is only one "know it all" poster here and it isn't me. We all know who that is. It may have escaped your notice but there are many subjects I avoid completely. Why? Because I don't know enough to make a contribution.

For the avoidance of doubt my opinions are not facts. Facts are facts and if I state one I will say so. If I don't it's an opinion.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards georgenorman Flag 18 Mar 24 9.38am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I welcome you not responding to me directly. Continuous rudeness is boring. You are though obsessed with some kind of irrational dislike of me, which is an odd phenomenon. It won't though stop me from commenting on some of the things you claim.

There is only one "know it all" poster here and it isn't me. We all know who that is. It may have escaped your notice but there are many subjects I avoid completely. Why? Because I don't know enough to make a contribution.

For the avoidance of doubt my opinions are not facts. Facts are facts and if I state one I will say so. If I don't it's an opinion.

If you think that people on here disliking you is an 'odd phenomenon', then you are even more deluded than we thought.

 

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 18 Mar 24 10.06am

Originally posted by georgenorman

If you think that people on here disliking you is an 'odd phenomenon', then you are even more deluded than we thought.

It's probably fair to say that an Internet persona will only be a small element of someone's real world personality.

I would guess that I am probably nothing like people might perceive from here, and I hope to god for Wisbech's sake that he is a much more likeable fellow in real life and is not as combative when not in a defensive posture.

Of course the fact that he is happy to see his offspring become a minority and his totally irrational loyalty to Brussels is hard to swallow.
Don't get me started on his inability to have any objectivity with American politics.

I'm sure his friends are all likewise deluded.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (18 Mar 2024 10.08am)

 

becky Flag over the moon 18 Mar 24 1.34pm

MODERATION POST

This thread has become nothing more than a commentary on/defense of people's opinions of other posters.

Please return to commenting on the BBC and not on other posters

Thank You

 


A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers

eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 18 Mar 24 2.24pm

#defundthebbc

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 18 Mar 24 2.35pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

This is a great post... Because it displays your incredible ignorance.

First. Neanderthals disappeared because there were far fewer of them than modern humans. We still carry a few percent of their genes. They were absorbed. Evidence suggests that they were sophisticated and actually had bigger brains than us. There is no evidence that they were 'dominated' other than in numbers.

Fact. The proportion of migrants has risen rapidly in the past 50 years.
Fact. Immigration is increasing.
Fact. First generation migrants tend to have more children than the British average. Even if the birth rate declines through subsequent generations, the population is continuously refreshed by new arrivals with higher birth rates.

Conclusion. The only way to avoid becoming a minority and eventually non existent is to halt mass migration. Your assertion relies on a total reversal of current policy and a deluded belief that a desire to migrate to Europe will decline.

Can you point to any evidence that this is likely to happen?

I will indeed return to the BBC after I have answered the claims made in the above, which ought not, in my opinion, be allowed to stand unchallenged.

What is true is that no-one knows for sure exactly what triggered the decline and eventual extinction of the Neanderthals. There is still a lot of debate about it as can be read here:-

[Link]

What is certain is they weren't simply absorbed. Something caused Homo sapiens to dominate. Their brains are thought to have been around the same size as ours, some think perhaps even bigger, but since when did size matter? It's how you use it. I would have thought you understood that principle! We developed skills that either by good fortune, or deliberate application, enabled us to survive and prosper, whilst the Neanderthals did not.

You clearly have not read the link I provided to the "Migration Observatory". Please do. They have much more experience and knowledge than anyone posting here. What they suggest will happen are not my assertions. They are there's. Here it is again:-

[Link]

Nothing you suggest will happen fits with the scenario described within the above.

I am sure you will try to challenge the work of the Migration Observatory and claim it's politically biased etc, etc. It isn't:-

[Link]

I am sure the BBC, being our responsible public broadcaster who are trusted the world over to deliver well researched facts and opinions, would totally agree with the Migration Observatory's analysis.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 18 Mar 24 2.57pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I will indeed return to the BBC after I have answered the claims made in the above, which ought not, in my opinion, be allowed to stand unchallenged.

What is true is that no-one knows for sure exactly what triggered the decline and eventual extinction of the Neanderthals. There is still a lot of debate about it as can be read here:-

[Link]

What is certain is they weren't simply absorbed. Something caused Homo sapiens to dominate. Their brains are thought to have been around the same size as ours, some think perhaps even bigger, but since when did size matter? It's how you use it. I would have thought you understood that principle! We developed skills that either by good fortune, or deliberate application, enabled us to survive and prosper, whilst the Neanderthals did not.

You clearly have not read the link I provided to the "Migration Observatory". Please do. They have much more experience and knowledge than anyone posting here. What they suggest will happen are not my assertions. They are there's. Here it is again:-

[Link]

Nothing you suggest will happen fits with the scenario described within the above.

I am sure you will try to challenge the work of the Migration Observatory and claim it's politically biased etc, etc. It isn't:-

[Link]

I am sure the BBC, being our responsible public broadcaster who are trusted the world over to deliver well researched facts and opinions, would totally agree with the Migration Observatory's analysis.

Of course you are, because you are that gullible.

There is speculation, extrapolation, pure propaganda and then facts.

Fact. The immigrant population has grown rapidly.
Fact. Immigration is increasing.
Fact. European birth rate is continuing to fall.
Fact. Migrant birth rate is higher and is perpetuating increasing population levels in Britian.

Speculation. Migration is very likely to increase due to climate change, increasing global population and greater friction between various groups.
Propaganda. None of those facts can be used to extrapolate a prediction for the future make up of the British population.

You and the BBC are denying facts and employing spin based on nothing.

How high would the percentage of non White British have to be before you stopped this ridiculous pretence?

 

Page 232 of 261 < 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)