This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Corbyn spent all his political life campaigning to leave the EU, as he took the Bennite line that it was just a capitalist club (a view I would agree with). It was only when he became leader of the Labour party that he had the apparent 'road to Damasucs' conversion to Remain. Haha. Not sure he had much of a conversion. His campaigning in this election compared with the EU ref shows what he is capable of when campaigning for policies in which he genuinely believes.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I agree, but it currently doesn't. MP's are in danger of betraying those who voted for a meaningful Brexit. Reckless and Carswell both had by-elections when they defected and so did Goldsmith when he went independent.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
David Davies now coming out with a brexit message even more confusing than before (didn't think that would be possible), stressing the importance of getting the best deal and making this a success for the "100%". Anyone care to enlighten me what exactly that means? Farage to return and I think the divisions in this country are set to get even more poisonous. I must admit I've changed my mind about brexit more times than I can count but the one thought I keep returning to is the fact that we seemed to be obsessed with "being just fine" which kind of makes you wonder what the point of all this uncertainty ever was in the first place. Apparently Davies was unaware that we couldn't make deals with anyone outside of the EU until we had officially left! He also said we could make a unilateral deal with Germany, which of course we cannot.
|
|
|
Originally posted by crystal balls
I think it would be reasonable to draw the conclusion that a number of those who voted for leave did so,not with a specific type of exit in mind, but as a protest against Cameron/Osborne and their misguided austerity program, or any other particular beef they may have had with the then government. The number of voters who favour a hard exit are extremely unlikely to be in the majority. I agree with this. Many people voted as a protest against the political classes. An anti-establishment vote if you will, but without much thought as to the intricacies of what a post-Brexit Britain would actually look like. Some people I know also believed that voting for Brexit would accelerate the downfall of the Tories (and quite possibly could be right).
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Yes small numbers will make a big difference in current parliament. Issue perhaps is that the current parliament may be very short! In which case most I would imagine will be quite keen to protect their interests. I could imagine that this would be more likely the longer the parliament goes on, but I can't see it happening in the next 12-18 months. This might be so. It is also possible to apply pressure from within the Tory Party of course, which could be the better personal choice.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
This might be so. It is also possible to apply pressure from within the Tory Party of course, which could be the better personal choice. Quite possibly. Interestingly the Sun think there is a majority in the commons in favour of a "soft Brexit" (this tweet from their political editor): [Tweet Link]
Also interestingly: George Freeman, the Conservative MP who chairs Theresa May’s policy forum, has posted a tweet saying the government should drop its “hard Brexit” message.
|
|
| jamiemartin721 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I'm not sure they ever wanted to end immigration, just reduce it and banning the Burka, although difficult in practice is correct by western standards of morally. No one should be forced either directly or with indoctrination to cover from head to foot.
Quite agree, but its an odd policy to push given around 1 or 2% of the UK Muslim population have adopted its use - especially when there probably were more pressing policy matters to focus on.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Who would have thought, only a few days ago, that the Queen's speech would be delayed to suit a band of Irish nut-cases? Apparently the delay is partly due to the ink taking several days to dry on the goatskin vellum that the Queen's speech is written on - it is the Nanny State gone mad. Edited by hedgehog50 (12 Jun 2017 4.54pm)
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Quite possibly. Interestingly the Sun think there is a majority in the commons in favour of a "soft Brexit" (this tweet from their political editor): [Tweet Link]
Also interestingly: George Freeman, the Conservative MP who chairs Theresa May’s policy forum, has posted a tweet saying the government should drop its “hard Brexit” message.
If they were allowed a free vote the 'soft' option figure would be a great deal higher than that.as over 450 MPs were for 'Remain' only 12 months ago. And I would hope more than 25 Tories would rebel if May was still in the chair.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Quite agree, but its an odd policy to push given around 1 or 2% of the UK Muslim population have adopted its use - especially when there probably were more pressing policy matters to focus on. Morally right is still right regardless of numbers, and it is a visible symbol of the negative cultural aspects of immigration. UKIP did seem very Mickey Mouse without strong leadership and focus.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
Quite possibly. Interestingly the Sun think there is a majority in the commons in favour of a "soft Brexit" (this tweet from their political editor): [Tweet Link]
Also interestingly: George Freeman, the Conservative MP who chairs Theresa May’s policy forum, has posted a tweet saying the government should drop its “hard Brexit” message.
Remainers have always had the majority in Parliament but it is the greater Party interests that dictate, at least so far. And the knock on effect for their own sorry arses of course.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Mrs May and her 'terms' over brexit could anything be more farcical. The EU has been watching, she sought a country unified behind her for brexit. She did not get it did she? Britain in a state of complete delusion. This article makes that point quite well.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Mrs May and her 'terms' over brexit could anything be more farcical. The EU has been watching, she sought a country unified behind her for brexit. She did not get it did she? Britain in a state of complete delusion. And you gloat at the prospect of Britain having it's position compromised.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
And you gloat at the prospect of Britain having it's position compromised. It's a difficult balance twixt schadenfreude and despair.
|
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Mrs May and her 'terms' over brexit could anything be more farcical. The EU has been watching, she sought a country unified behind her for brexit. She did not get it did she? Britain in a state of complete delusion. Deluded about what?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
At the very least the DUP want a relatively open border with the Republic since it is a provision of the Good Friday agreement. From a BBC.com post: "On Brexit, the DUP want the border with the Irish Republic to be as 'seamless and frictionless' as possible,' and they reject the Special EU status championed by Sinn Féin, which they regard as watering down Northern Ireland's Britishness." See [Link] They do have problems in Stormont and could be using the Westminster situation to divert attention.
Divorced...And LOVING it! |
|
|
Originally posted by kenbarr
At the very least the DUP want a relatively open border with the Republic since it is a provision of the Good Friday agreement. From a BBC.com post: "On Brexit, the DUP want the border with the Irish Republic to be as 'seamless and frictionless' as possible,' and they reject the Special EU status championed by Sinn Féin, which they regard as watering down Northern Ireland's Britishness." See [Link] They do have problems in Stormont and could be using the Westminster situation to divert attention. Westminster has to be neutral according to the Good Friday agreement it is dificult to see how they can be if they are in cahoots with the DUP. It would be surprising if Sinn Fein resume Stormont in that case. 20 years hard work could be undone by Mrs May to stay in power.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.