This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
It does seem you are making assumptions as said, unless of course, you have concrete evidence to support your view. We all know how you like posters to post facts ( and the dismiss them as fake news if don’t support your views) It's all assumptions isn't it! That's the point.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It's all assumptions isn't it! That's the point. But there is evidence to support your assumptions, allegedly. Funny that
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
It is nearly polling day Sir Keir. Do you think you can interest us with a policy? Sorry to bother you of course.
Keir is to busy grabbing the headlines doing his best for Britain by selecting wallpapers and drinking beer in working men's clubs,rather than putting forward alternative policies.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
We though aren't "other bloc countries" are we! We have played a leading role in fighting the virus and have developed one of the most important vaccines. We have never been one of the minor players. Our voice mattered and we also were often outliers in the way we approached things, so your assumptions are just that. Assumptions. With The NHS behind them our government may well have dealt with this differently to other countries. This assumption that the EU could force us to toe a line is simply untrue. They could have expected, and even demanded, a unified approach but there is no guarantee we would have obliged, if our government had decided otherwise. This is what the Brexiteers failed to comprehend. We always remained an independent nation state who were able to put our own interests first if circumstances demanded we did so. That the EU Commission decided to adopt a common strategy does not mean we would have agreed to join it. If we were such a major player in the eu why did Cameron get the finger?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
But there is evidence to support your assumptions, allegedly. Funny that That was regarding the economic impact of Brexit. Not whether the UK would have been forced to follow the EU's path on vaccine procurement. There is evidence in plain view for the first. The second can only be speculation.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
If we were such a major player in the eu why did Cameron get the finger? It wasn't "the finger"! They both made a very bad miscalculation and ended up with a result that neither wanted.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
If we were such a major player in the eu why did Cameron get the finger? Because Cameron told them that he would win. The EU believed the pollsters and all the experts. The Government, the opposition, the Trade Unions, the CBI, the big banks, the pop stars, the footballers, in short anybody who liked to believe they understood the UK were on the Remain side. Simply put, why should they give Cameron anything? No point. And even if the referendum did not go their way, then they would just ensure it happened again and again until the right result was obtained. Hence why the EU are still in complete denial about what happened. There was a great quote in amongst all the news about talks with Norway falling apart. Apparently its down to the British being to hung up on principles. Seriously. This has been quoted from an EU official. “What makes the U.K. often stick to its guns is a matter of principle, it’s political. What we feel is that we prefer to have an agreement, because otherwise it would set a very bad precedent for the very sensitive negotiations on fishing opportunities that we face.”
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
| Tom-the-eagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That was regarding the economic impact of Brexit. Not whether the UK would have been forced to follow the EU's path on vaccine procurement. There is evidence in plain view for the first. The second can only be speculation. Yet again, they are both speculation. How the country fares in the future, this has not yet been written.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
|
Originally posted by Tom-the-eagle
Yet again, they are both speculation. How the country fares in the future, this has not yet been written. Of course it hasn't! It's not been suggested otherwise. Only that there is evidence to support the assertion that it isn't going too well.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
From the Guardian... Labour set for huge election defeat in Hartlepool, internal polling suggests... [Link] s***. This is going to be bloody messy if it pans out. I reckon the Trade Unions will move against him. Edited by Matov (04 May 2021 8.38pm)
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
| Tom-the-eagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Of course it hasn't! It's not been suggested otherwise. Only that there is evidence to support the assertion that it isn't going too well. Yet again, more opinion trying to be passed off as fact. There is no evidence to say things are going badly, only opinion. Many are delighted at how things are going. We were led to believe that the sky would fall in once we left and yet life is ticking along just fine.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
From the Guardian... Labour set for huge election defeat in Hartlepool, internal polling suggests... [Link] s***. This is going to be bloody messy if it pans out. I reckon the Trade Unions will move against him. Edited by Matov (04 May 2021 8.38pm) A strong Brexit voting constituency though.
|
|
|
Originally posted by chris123
A strong Brexit voting constituency though.
And Labour won in Hartlepool in 2019. This not a seat for them to gain but to defend. If they lose it then it is a shocking inditement of how steep the hill is they have to climb if they want to stay relevant in British politics. Losing tomorrow is catastrophic for them. And if the Unions insist that Starmer steps down in the wake of it, and threaten to withdraw their funding if he does not, then the Labour Party is facing a crisis in terms of why it even exists anymore.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
And Labour won in Hartlepool in 2019. This not a seat for them to gain but to defend. If they lose it then it is a shocking inditement of how steep the hill is they have to climb if they want to stay relevant in British politics. Losing tomorrow is catastrophic for them. And if the Unions insist that Starmer steps down in the wake of it, and threaten to withdraw their funding if he does not, then the Labour Party is facing a crisis in terms of why it even exists anymore. Brexit party may have skewed that vote surely?
|
|
|
Originally posted by chris123
Brexit party may have skewed that vote surely? Absolutely. But the point remains. Labour needs people who voted for either the Brexit party or the Tories to change their minds and vote for them. Conventional political wisdom/reality holds that in these local council elections, especially on the back of Government being in power for over 10 years, that the Opposition should be cleaning up. Winning huge slews of council seats. Certainly not potentially losing them. And most definitely not losing by-elections. For a party that proclaims itself as the natural home of the working classes, to even be fearful of losing a constituency such as Hartlepool is beyond a joke. Because if Labour do lose, then what is the point of them anymore? Why should Trade Unions continue to fund a political organisation that is so inept? We could be waking up on Friday at the start of a process that sees Labour cease to exist in its current form within the next 12 months. This is truly a crisis moment for them.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
You have to laugh. '.@BorisJohnson has delivered #Brexit #tradedeals and jobs for #Harlepool along with a #Freeport and 180,000 well paid jobs. #Conservatives deliver, we get stuff done. Nadine Dorries - Tory minister. You Certainly do, Nadine, Hartlepool's population is only 92,000.
Clutching at straws Steeley?
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.