This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
They haven't looked after the likes of us for close to two generations. They are an absolute laughing stock!! To be fair the Tories have been in power for most of those two generations. But they are able to reinvent themselves each time they swop leader and blame problems caused by their failures on some scapegoat or other. Nothing he says can be trusted at all.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You seem really familiar 'Bill'. Your leader is a terrorist-supporting, flood victim exploiting Marxist scumbag who is hated by a good chunk of his own party. How bad can Boris look? Pretty bad. Bad enough to make people who refuse to acknowledge his obvious flaws because of partisan priorities pretty stupid. I do wish people would just say – 'Yes, fair point, he is a prick, but he's the best worst option in my opinion so that's why I'm voting for him. And yes, that does mean that I'm endorsing a prick. So be it.' And of course – I hate Marxists / People who can't do up their tie properly etc. etc. etc.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by Bill E Pilgrim
To be fair the Tories have been in power for most of those two generations. But they are able to reinvent themselves each time they swop leader and blame problems caused by their failures on some scapegoat or other. Nothing he says can be trusted at all. Yeah, but he has a surprisingly impressive singing voice.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Bill E Pilgrim
To be fair the Tories have been in power for most of those two generations. But they are able to reinvent themselves each time they swop leader and blame problems caused by their failures on some scapegoat or other. Nothing he says can be trusted at all.
Next you will be asking me for one example of Corbyn lying. I really can't be bothered to engage with such a purposefully infantile view of politics.
|
|
|
Originally posted by dollardays
I tend to agree. It'll surely mean that the Conservatives will hold onto all existing seats, and have more success in the Labour marginals. It's worth noting that plenty of disenfranchised Labour voters who would never consider voting Conservative will happily vote Brexit Party. So with that in mind, Labour capaculate votes in all directions. The only real reply to this would be for Lib Dems and Labour to form some kind of pact, but they're not really on the same page so I can't see it happening. Labour are screwed. As many have pointed out, there is no clear message. Even if they suddenly all aligned, the bumbling of the last two years will have made it too late. Also, average people need simple, clear messages to repeat ad nauseam to all their friends (and internal monologues), not because they know what they're voting for but because it sounds good and it's easy to remember. Patronising? You bet. See any successful advertising campaign ever. Your average 95%er does not read beyond the headline, let alone investigate and drill down into the detail. The remain protest vote will leech from the tories to the lib dems in the south/south east, likely to happen in Cheltenham according to an interesting article in the FT. Johnson is concentrating on northern seats leaving most metropolitan areas to Labour, barring a few exceptions where the lead is very slim. The point around some abandoning labour for the brexit party is probably spot on – can't bring themselves to vote tory so would rather protest. Fair enough. Labour will get smashed but I think the lib dem and brexit party vote will draw enough votes away to make getting a majority a real challenge. What happens beyond then – If Labour actually bother to get their act together it could become more interesting over the next few years. Can't see trade talks going smoothly, and their spending plans are already on extremely sandy ground.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Pretty bad. Bad enough to make people who refuse to acknowledge his obvious flaws because of partisan priorities pretty stupid. I do wish people would just say – 'Yes, fair point, he is a prick, but he's the best worst option in my opinion so that's why I'm voting for him. And yes, that does mean that I'm endorsing a prick. So be it.' And of course – I hate Marxists / People who can't do up their tie properly etc. etc. etc. All things are relative but I would happily vote for a tin of spam over Corbyn.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
All things are relative but I would happily vote for a tin of spam over Corbyn. Fair enough.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
All things are relative but I would happily vote for a tin of spam over Corbyn. It would certainly cost us less. Mind you I'd imagine its domestic policies would definitely annoy the Greens. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Nov 2019 2.02pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It would certainly cost us less. Mind you I'd imagine its domestic policies would definitely annoy the Greens. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Nov 2019 2.02pm) Wait till they hear it has appointed a beef sandwich as Chancellor.
|
|
| Invalid user 2019 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Labour are screwed. As many have pointed out, there is no clear message. Even if they suddenly all aligned, the bumbling of the last two years will have made it too late. Also, average people need simple, clear messages to repeat ad nauseam to all their friends (and internal monologues), not because they know what they're voting for but because it sounds good and it's easy to remember. Patronising? You bet. See any successful advertising campaign ever. Your average 95%er does not read beyond the headline, let alone investigate and drill down into the detail. The remain protest vote will leech from the tories to the lib dems in the south/south east, likely to happen in Cheltenham according to an interesting article in the FT. Johnson is concentrating on northern seats leaving most metropolitan areas to Labour, barring a few exceptions where the lead is very slim. The point around some abandoning labour for the brexit party is probably spot on – can't bring themselves to vote tory so would rather protest. Fair enough. Labour will get smashed but I think the lib dem and brexit party vote will draw enough votes away to make getting a majority a real challenge. What happens beyond then – If Labour actually bother to get their act together it could become more interesting over the next few years. Can't see trade talks going smoothly, and their spending plans are already on extremely sandy ground. Yes, in my view Corbyn has a stranglehold on the party. I'm not saying he doesn't have any worthwhile ideas, but politically you'd struggle to find a less popular party leader. Without him I think they'd possibly hold a position on Brexit that at least had a element of consistency to it. It's a good point to say that there are enough factors at play to say that gaining a majority isn't a formality for the Tories. It's not an unlikely scenario either though by any stretch, whereas the very best scenario for Labour would likely be a hung parliament, and that would put us in even more of a political no man's land that the previous election did.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Wait till they hear it has appointed a beef sandwich as Chancellor. We would certainly be in a pickle. Mind you I bet Eric Pickles loved a few beef sandwiches....probably just as a starter.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Invalid user 2019 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
For the Tories to get an overall majority, they're going to have to pick up seats from other parties, and in some numbers, whilst holding on to their own, quite a few of which might be called vulnerable. Can anybody see this happening? Because I can't. The Tories have a healthy lead in the polls right now, and the Brexit Party not contesting the 317 seats they won previously won't do them any harm. I get what you're saying though, as there are a number of dynamics at play. Corbyn is very unpopular already, and so it could be said that the only way is up. But I feel that for leave voters, people have a much clearer idea of who to vote for this time around than reamainers do, and in a FPTP system that might give them the edge in a number of marginals.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
For the Tories to get an overall majority, they're going to have to pick up seats from other parties, and in some numbers, whilst holding on to their own, quite a few of which might be called vulnerable. Can anybody see this happening? Because I can't. My own view is: In summary I think it's the Lib Dems and the Brexit party who will hurt or help the Tories. Labour is a known quantity I just don't see undecided people flocking to their banner.
One more point |
|
|
Originally posted by dollardays
The Tories have a healthy lead in the polls right now, and the Brexit Party not contesting the 317 seats they won previously won't do them any harm. I get what you're saying though, as there are a number of dynamics at play. Corbyn is very unpopular already, and so it could be said that the only way is up. But I feel that for leave voters, people have a much clearer idea of who to vote for this time around than reamainers do, and in a FPTP system that might give them the edge in a number of marginals. Indeed but Hilary Clinton was once 1/10 to win the US Presidential election,Theresa May was expected to gain a much increased majority and Remain were expected to win the referendum. I take nothing for granted.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Bill E Pilgrim
Nothing he says can be trusted at all. Why do you keep insisting on referring to him by his full name as it seems rather childish to me. Is Boris Johnson any worse than Diane Julie Abbott (see how silly it looks) Diane Abbott lied when she said that Labour had only lost 50 seats Diane Abbott lied when she claimed it would cost £300,000 to hire the 10,000 new bobbies during an interview with LBC. Diane Abbott lied about knife deaths in Scotland during 2017, when she claimed there was none. Nothing she says can be trusted at all.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Why do you keep insisting on referring to him by his full name as it seems rather childish to me. Is Boris Johnson any worse than Diane Julie Abbott (see how silly it looks) Diane Abbott lied when she said that Labour had only lost 50 seats Diane Abbott lied when she claimed it would cost £300,000 to hire the 10,000 new bobbies during an interview with LBC. Diane Abbott lied about knife deaths in Scotland during 2017, when she claimed there was none. Nothing she says can be trusted at all. I think it's fairly obvious. The common 'man 'o the people' pleb voting for an elite without admitting or in most cases even understanding the irony has always amused me. And you don't get much more elite than that rather large overpiffled grouping. As for 'all politicians lie', well obviously. Another thing I fail to understand. Why do people insist on countering with 'well look what so and so did so there' when they all do it? Are you five? Fine point it out, but don't do it in a way that seeks to make one look better than the other. It's disingenuous and meaningless. But if you need to tell yourself that you're voting for the better person in order to make it more tolerable, then fine.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
I think it's fairly obvious. The common 'man 'o the people' pleb voting for an elite without admitting or in most cases even understanding the irony has always amused me. And you don't get much more elite than that rather large overpiffled grouping. As for 'all politicians lie', well obviously. Another thing I fail to understand. Why do people insist on countering with 'well look what so and so did so there' when they all do it? Are you five? Fine point it out, but don't do it in a way that seeks to make one look better than the other. It's disingenuous and meaningless. But if you need to tell yourself that you're voting for the better person in order to make it more tolerable, then fine.
Come off it. The Boris is a liar ploy in the wider context of politics is utterly feeble. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (13 Nov 2019 3.36pm)
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.