This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Farage is an opportunist c*** who has sewn division in the country. Ok fair summarisation. What about your views on one quarter of CPFC 2010 seemingly Pro Brexit?
Pro USA & Israel |
|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Ok fair summarisation. What about your views on one quarter of CPFC 2010 seemingly Pro Brexit? They're "racists", right? I mean you only have to look at our squad to come to that conclusion. They're also stupid - they didn't know what they were voting for. They were also lied to, so should be made to vote again.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Ok fair summarisation. What about your views on one quarter of CPFC 2010 seemingly Pro Brexit? I'd say it's good that three quarters didn't.
|
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
They're "racists", right? I mean you only have to look at our squad to come to that conclusion. They're also stupid - they didn't know what they were voting for. They were also lied to, so should be made to vote again.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
I'd say it's good that three quarters didn't. Actually I meant Half of CPFC 2010
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Actually I meant Half of CPFC 2010 I'd say it depends on what reason they chose to vote leave. I might be perturbed if it's to take are country back
|
|
| hedgehog50 |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Like Corbyn isn't an opportunistic c*** who divides the country?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Farage is an opportunist c*** who has sewn division in the country. Man oh man this made me so fecking angry. No Nick, people like you with the policies you supported, policies which created so much division for so many....That's what created Ukip.... Farage only had to represent it. So sorry people don't see the world you do...You know. The c--ts who decided how we should live...making huge changes without asking first....they created Farage and you fecking completely deserve him.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Man oh man this made me so fecking angry. No Nick, people like you with the policies you supported, policies which created so much division for so many....That's what created Ukip.... Farage only had to represent it. So sorry people don't see the world you do...You know. The c--ts who decided how we should live...making huge changes without asking first....they created Farage and you fecking completely deserve him.
UKIP are all for selling off the NHS. That's enough for me. The blokes a self serving charlatan
Edited by nickgusset (25 Apr 2017 7.51am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Like Corbyn isn't an opportunistic c*** who divides the country? He has certainly divided his party and all those people who have supported the 'Labour' party year on year are NOT doing so because of him and his fellow comrades.
|
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
UKIP are all for selling off the NHS. That's enough for me. The blokes a self serving charlatan
Edited by nickgusset (25 Apr 2017 7.51am) Errrr...why are you referring to non EU stuff?....at what point were Ukip winning an election and forming a government? You called him an 'opportunistic c-nt'. You are quite clearly referring to his success against the EU.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| nickgusset |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Errrr...why are you referring to non EU stuff?....at what point were Ukip winning an election and forming a government? You called him an 'opportunistic c-nt'. You are quite clearly referring to his success against the EU. What's UKIP's (who have no mps but get loads of press coverage) plan for Brexit?
|
|
|
Originally posted by davenotamonkey
Nothing on CETA? No one can tell me what would be so terrible about using the Canada deal as the starting point for our negotiations? Let me re-iterate the core features: - Canada does not pay anything into the EU budget Can someone explain to me how a country with the 5th largest world economy, a £24b+/yr trade EU deficit and 100% convergence in EU standards should not be getting at the very least the deal Canada currently has? As a starting point? A one-size fits all solution like that is way, way too simplistic. There are just so many factors/variables from country to country that will influence relationships and deals. Personalities, positional strengths and weaknesses, public opinion, length of time to finalise a deal, hubris, etc. Don't forget, these are politicians we are talking about. Canada won't rely on EU fruit and veg pickers, for example, to maximise productivity in that sector nor have nearly 20% of Uni Academics from EU countries as we have here [Link] so, perhaps, aspects which are convoluted for the UK/EU are much more black and white for Canada/EU This is not the time for naive idealism. That ended with Article 50 being invoked. Hard practical solutions, please.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
What's UKIP's (who have no mps but get loads of press coverage) plan for Brexit?
I don't know and it doesn't matter. All that matters is the government's plan. I voted for Ukip to get out of the EU. If I vote for them again it would only really be over EU related matters. As for the press coverage. I'd say getting four million votes does deserve some....It's more than the SNP got and they get quite a lot in England. Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Apr 2017 8.45am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Tom-the-eagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
UKIP are all for selling off the NHS. That's enough for me. The blokes a self serving charlatan
Edited by nickgusset (25 Apr 2017 7.51am) I would say that Farage is anything but self-serving. As soon as we voted for Brexit he stepped down as his party leader as he believed his work to have been finished. Farage, like Corbyn, are two of the very few actual conviction politicians who I would say aren’t indeed self-serving.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I don't know and it doesn't matter. All that matters is the government's plan. I voted for Ukip to get out of the EU. If I vote for them again it would only really be over EU related matters. As for the press coverage. I'd say getting four million votes does deserve some....It's more than the SNP got and they get quite a lot in England. Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Apr 2017 8.45am) SNP got more votes per seat where they stood. They also have 50 odd MPs so actually have some say in Parliament. UKIP don't. Also SNP are in power in Holyrood so actually have power to make some decisions in an important part of the UK. SNP are a lot more relevant than UKIP, especially as they are currently pushing for a second independence referendum. If Scotland leaves the UK they will then cease to be quite so relevant!
|
|
| legaleagle |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Man oh man this made me so fecking angry. No Nick, people like you with the policies you supported, policies which created so much division for so many....That's what created Ukip.... Farage only had to represent it. So sorry people don't see the world you do...You know. The c--ts who decided how we should live...making huge changes without asking first....they created Farage and you fecking completely deserve him.
I presume you are referring immigration? Forgive me if I am wrong. You suggest its all people like Nick's "fault". So far as I can see,when you refer to C**ts telling you how to live,you must mean telling you to live alongside people who are not the English "volk".Well,that rules out Wilf, Punch, Bolasie,Victor Moses, Nat Clyne etc.None of them have enriched our local football culture at all,have they? Well,without getting into your game of "fault",ie something to blame,let's look at fundamentals. Non EU pre 1990's immigration, fundamental starting point was the Tory governments 1951-64.This included the "muslim" immigration that vexes you so. EU immigration (almost all non Muslim immigration).The key fundamental starting point was Thatcher's vision of an enlarged EU moving eastwards to take in the former Soviet bloc countries in Europe. Mind you,I'd have to agree with you that Thatcher was a c**t,but for different reasons! Edited by legaleagle (25 Apr 2017 9.19am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by CambridgeEagle
SNP got more votes per seat where they stood. They also have 50 odd MPs so actually have some say in Parliament. UKIP don't. Also SNP are in power in Holyrood so actually have power to make some decisions in an important part of the UK. SNP are a lot more relevant than UKIP, especially as they are currently pushing for a second independence referendum. If Scotland leaves the UK they will then cease to be quite so relevant! What does it matter whether they got 'more votes per seat'? Hahaha! It's a UK election and it's a question about UK coverage. Ukip actually had more votes and the question was as too whether they deserved the press they received. They quite plainly did. Though in matters that aren't related to the EU....I'm not quite so sure.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.