This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Previous Topic | Next Topic
SE25 Melbourne 18 Apr 14 9.29am |
 |
Quote adrian b at 17 Apr 2014 7.23pm
WE shouldn't really slate Doogie too much. Once he had this information he had to share it with the authorities or become an accessory to the fact. That may have meant sanctions against Bolton. He had no option. Anyway, we should all want open-handed honesty, shouldn't we?
Accessory to the fact ? Blimey ! He received a text with some players names on it - not the Brinks Mat gold ! He's a right snake. He tipped OGS off as they're mates. Despite the fact he had the support of so many Palace people for so long. Showed his true colours once and for all - anyone still defending him is a moron (sorry - but it's true)
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Username Horsham 18 Apr 14 10.51am |
 |
Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 9.29am
Quote adrian b at 17 Apr 2014 7.23pm
WE shouldn't really slate Doogie too much. Once he had this information he had to share it with the authorities or become an accessory to the fact. That may have meant sanctions against Bolton. He had no option. Anyway, we should all want open-handed honesty, shouldn't we?
Accessory to the fact ? Blimey ! He received a text with some players names on it - not the Brinks Mat gold ! He's a right snake. He tipped OGS off as they're mates. Despite the fact he had the support of so many Palace people for so long. Showed his true colours once and for all - anyone still defending him is a moron (sorry - but it's true)
I'm reluctant to have a go at DF here because, if he was involved at all, it's not like he asked someone to send him a message containing the Cardiff team.
Employee of the month is a good example of how someone can be both a winner and a loser at the same time.
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jim_Cannon Dulwich 18 Apr 14 10.55am |
 |
Quote Seth at 18 Apr 2014 1.28am
Here's the actual letter:
Loving the letter - class. Perhaps Tan will declare War
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
SE25 Melbourne 18 Apr 14 11.01am |
 |
Quote Username at 18 Apr 2014 10.51am
Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 9.29am
Quote adrian b at 17 Apr 2014 7.23pm
WE shouldn't really slate Doogie too much. Once he had this information he had to share it with the authorities or become an accessory to the fact. That may have meant sanctions against Bolton. He had no option. Anyway, we should all want open-handed honesty, shouldn't we?
Accessory to the fact ? Blimey ! He received a text with some players names on it - not the Brinks Mat gold ! He's a right snake. He tipped OGS off as they're mates. Despite the fact he had the support of so many Palace people for so long. Showed his true colours once and for all - anyone still defending him is a moron (sorry - but it's true)
I'm reluctant to have a go at DF here because, if he was involved at all, it's not like he asked someone to send him a message containing the
quote]
Huh ? Receiving the text isn't the issue - sending it on to the detriment of Palace is. He put OGS (and Cardiff) ahead of the club that he spent years at and that gave him his management start. He betrayed all Palace fans.None of us should be reluctant to have a go at Freedman. He's an ungrateful , spiteful prick.
Edited by SE25 (18 Apr 2014 11.07am)
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
bexleydave Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 11.27am |
 |
Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am
Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,
I think you're confusing an allegation of a breach of the regulations of a sporting body with criminal acts that are enshrined in statute and common law. No crime has been committed as far as I'm aware (from the fulsome disclosures by the BBC) and I'm not, therefore, expecting anyone to be arrested or any criminal charges laid any time soon.
Bexley Dave
Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!
"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
eagleboi Catford 18 Apr 14 11.28am |
 |
Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am
Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,
Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
bexleydave Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 11.31am |
 |
Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am
What a ghastly, snivelling little sneak he is.
Indeed. If we were all back at school he'd have been bogwashed for that.
Bexley Dave
Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!
"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Previous Topic | Next Topic